What's new

RSS men, in a fresh row, claim Taj a Shiva temple

Status
Not open for further replies.
Fiqa and Firqa are not races. That being said, Hanafi, Shafi, Maliki and Hanbali etc are not sects but fiqas, the interpretations

1. firqa, mazhab or any other word, it is sectarianism.

2. if you have seen my posts since last year, i have been putting forward the future of islam... i may choose to call it my interpretation but i will not... what is natural is islam without sects and subsects... so consider the old four as obsolete.

3. i am only a humble person... i will just name the current imam of all muslims, muammar gaddafi... he has that title by his words, works and ambitions... no other person can call himself or herself that... we should be learning from his ways.

4. some pakistani members really use words like "chura", "low caste laborer", "kanjar" in a very insulting manner... that is racism.
 
Last edited:
.
1. firqa, mazhab or any other word, it is sectarianism.

2. if you have seen my posts since last year, i have been putting forward the future of islam... i may choose to call it my interpretation but i will not... what is natural is islam without sects and subsects... so consider the old four as obsolete.

.
Hindi bhaiya, there are indeed no sects or sub-sects in Islam.......the four Imams were just scholars, we just consult their study. That being said, sects do exist which deviated from main islam e,g shias. qadianis, bareilwais etc
 
. .
I think if you look closer you will find many such evidences.
If the steps in this picture and the design on plinth wall were done at the same time then you would not have seen such a blunder.

View attachment 208418


We know the truth in Babri masjid case because there were continuous attempts by the local hindus to redeem the temple. Its sad that Babri masjid took
In Taj Mahal's case, asi would hide the facts to maintain the status quo, and nobody wants to add fuel to fire ergo asi too will avoid doing it.
But in the end it doesnt really matter if a temple existed there long back, we(hindus) have one temple less to go to and that's not a biggie. Taj Mahal is a cash cow which India can not afford to destroy.

Jamahir I can go on and on about Taj mahal, and post more proof, but I would refrain myself from doing so because I know the hindus and muslims in our country 're always on the look out for a spark that can burn down the entire country.

No Mahal or the money it provides is worth the temple buried underneath.
 
.
No Mahal or the money it provides is worth the temple buried underneath.
God exists within us that's what the vedas teach you, dont search for him in a temple or a mosque.
 
.
Thats indeed true but i cant tolerate a symbol of intolerance.
 
.
The same Mughals who invented Deen-e-ilahi? against whom Shiekh Ahamd Sirhindi got active?.........Sheikh Ahmad Sirhindi aka Majadad Alaf Sani didnt want islam in India to be bastardized by biddah and hindu influences.......unfortunately, the biddahized and hinduized version of islam persisted and was given name of bareliwism in 1900.

deobandi-ism is hindufication of islam because all deobandi-ism is, is basically life to be strictly followed in prayer and ritual where the mullah and the mosque substitute for idols... the simplicity of real islam is not for the deobandi cult and its preacher/pre-terrorist version, the tableeghi jamaat.

the deobandi mullah school was created by the britishers to ensure that no great muslim leader like tipu sultan ever rises from india.

[edited: please dont quote Mods just report

please close this thread... some members like samandri and his thanker, terry, are embarrassing muslims... i hope they look at things more carefully.
 
.
temporarily closing for review

your freedom stops near the nose of the other person. be mindful and show as much respect and retraint as much you want from others for your beliefs (or lack of them).

will be reopened by mods if requested
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom