The_Showstopper
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2011
- Messages
- 6,708
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
Apne mooh miya mitthooNot really...that's just how it is defined & interpreted by anyone who is not biased & blinded.
When did I claim that the other side did not suffer, but the sufferings of muslims were of much greater proportion than the other side...Not at all.. I was just trying to make a point to prove how absurd your argument sounds when you try & make it as if only one group of people suffered while other side escaped completely unhurt.
Did I ever claim that? No I didn't but why are you trying to put the blame aka "sins" on those who suffered more casualties? I hope you get to see the absurdity in your above statement.Oh OK..so just 'cause number 790 is bigger than the number 254, it absolves one group of people of all sins 'cause they suffered more casualties? Do you know how absurd that sounds? So according to you killing is OK as long as it's done in a particular way?
I am sure you will either way discredit every source I post even the rulings of the honorable courts as I've seen Sanghis even lambasting Supreme Court for the recent rulings.Of course I'm going to doubt the credibility of your source if your source if affiliated to a particular political party or aligned to a particular political ideology, with plenty of reason to be biased.
Do you not read what I write before answering?Score! Now let's is which one looks more like ethnic cleansing & genocide.
790 of 14.2% community vs 254 OR 2800 of 1.7% community vs 11
Now I'll let you decide...
I clearly stated in my #53
"Indeed a complete of helpless people killed by marauding majority.... And what makes you think that Sikhs did not retaliate? The below is one such retaliation...
11 HINDUS KILLED IN PUNJAB UNREST - NYTimes.com"
And I can post many such instances...
Anyways Why do you have to compare 2002 and '84? Is it to make the crimes committed in 2002 look like very minute? Just because lesser people died does not mean that 2002 was any lesser crime. It was systematic and well thought out plan to cleanse muslims off Gujarat... And the below poster of VHP/Bajrang Dal proves my point..
Well its the perception of 69% of Indians... Sad for youTrue. Your perception is a fact.
Good to see you are finally unleashing the Babu Bajrangi within you...You are talking to an Indian Islamist.
He himself had posted that he does not hate India per se but is allergic to Hinduism.
Extent of reaction? Are you trying to justify the happenings of 2002?So what your point is just because Extent of reaction Hindus was on high scale which was obvious as it was hindu majority state the
Really... Any source to prove that?157 riots that was initiated by Minority Post Godhra is justified
Are you telling me that you are neutral? No I don't think that you are.. In the very same post you go on to blame muslim community for all the ills and then claim you are neutral. How funny can this be?What sick mindset by saying this your loosing support from guys who neutral.
Just show me a post of mine where I justified the killings of innocents? And please do reply to this post since I want to know your opinion.You point's are bluntly self-centered for particular community and in support of the argument of Eye for an eye.you are not different from Guys who justify Babri mosque destruction by saying it was build on destroyed ruins of Temple or One who justify Gujarat riots in the shade of Godhra train burning