Rights activists suggest taking Tipaimukh issue to UN int’l court

[TopCat]

There are many resentment when Partition happened like Murshiabad came in India, Lahore was given to Pakistan, Gurdaspur given to India etc. etc. Anyway I don't want to know who did what but the why you criticize Sheikh Hasina when she is solving enclave-issues with India or Indian companies doing investment in Bangladesh.

Bangladesh did not complaint against enclave solution rather all bangladeshis are for it. The reason we are complaining is that Hasina trusting India too much, as India will not solve this problem even though they signed the treaty.

We are saying so from our previous experience. When we handed over Berubari 35 years ago India never ratified and handed over their 3 Bigha corridore to us.

So this time we changed the clause of the treaty. In the previous treaty, it was up to the parties to ratify that to their parliament in their own convenience. But, this time the treaty says, India has to ratify first then Bangladesh will ratify. See the difference and trust deficit? Dont blame us, just blame urself.

 

[TopCat]

Actually, most of the CHT folks are Buddhists. They are a nice bunch, I enjoyed being around them. And Rangamati is so beautiful

Exactly right and they were also for Pakistan instead of India.

 

[patna_ke_presley]

Bangladesh did not complaint against enclave solution rather all bangladeshis are for it. The reason we are complaining is that Hasina trusting India too much, as India will not solve this problem even though they signed the treaty.

We are saying so from our previous experience. When we handed over Berubari 35 years ago India never ratified and handed over their 3 Bigha corridore to us.

So this time we changed the clause of the treaty. In the previous treaty, it was up to the parties to ratify that to their parliament in their own convenience. But, this time the treaty says, India has to ratify first then Bangladesh will ratify. See the difference and trust deficit? Dont blame us, just blame urself.

Anyway I don't know much about the matter who cheated whom in this matter because each side have their own version of story. Anyway, no problem with the new clause. But many Indians still fear that if Khaleda Zia come back she will again sour relation with India and ULFA may again get safe heaven in BD.

---------- Post added at 10:36 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:35 PM ----------

Exactly right and they were also for Pakistan instead of India.

Really, will Buddhists support for an Islamic Republic. I am 100% sure, they never cared being the part of India or Pakistan.

 

[TopCat]

Really, will Buddhists support for an Islamic Republic. I am 100% sure, they never cared being the part of India or Pakistan.

They did not support a Hindu Republic more to say. They even supported Pakistan army and faught against Muktis and Indian army for you to know.

 

[patna_ke_presley]

They did not support a Hindu Republic more to say. They even supported Pakistan army and faught against Muktis and Indian army for you to know.

That's why I said they must have stayed neutral. Also, 1971 war was based on Bengali Nationalism, I totally agree with you.

 

[TopCat]

That's why I said they must have stayed neutral. Also, 1971 war was based on Bengali Nationalism, I totally agree with you.

They were not involved in partition but raised Pakistani flag after the partition. Despite some early grivances regarding Bengali settlement, they made the right choice as they are one of the most properous part of the country now.

 

[LaBong]

Chakmas supporting Pakistan has nothing to do with their religion, I can't fathom why you lot are so obsessed with religion. They supported Pakistan because Bangladeshis don't seem to co-exists with any other ethnic group peacefully.

 

[LaBong]

Anyway stop bickering and enjoy the song folks!

Paye pori paye pori, jaiyo na o moynar baap
aamare talaq dia jaiyo naa

This is just epic.

 

[patna_ke_presley]

They were not involved in partition but raised Pakistani flag after the partition. Despite some early grivances regarding Bengali settlement, they made the right choice as they are one of the most properous part of the country now.

That's your internal matter, how you treat them, we suppose to talk about India-Bangladesh.

 

[LaBong]

"Tui Koylar moto kaalo
toore lagane je bhaalo
tui jalas ne e buke te jaala"

what's up bangladeshis, racism much? :/

 

[InFn-0]

Chakmas supporting Pakistan has nothing to do with their religion, I can't fathom why you lot are so obsessed with religion. They supported Pakistan because Bangladeshis don't seem to co-exists with any other ethnic group peacefully.

Never thought i d have to see a day when some indian dude would be saying to Bangladeshis that we cannot co exist with one another, funny. Could you please show me a link which talks about racial violence in Bangladesh?

 

[TopCat]

Chakmas supporting Pakistan has nothing to do with their religion, I can't fathom why you lot are so obsessed with religion. They supported Pakistan because Bangladeshis don't seem to co-exists with any other ethnic group peacefully.

I did not expect a sweeping remark from you at least.
It is the sheer number and dominance of Bengalis did make some discomfort among minorities thats for sure. At the very early stage of a country, not all the pros and cons could be taken care off. But once attention was drawn, it had been dealt with upmost seriousness and the problem was resolved. You can check your facts. CHT rebells are now celebrity in this country.

 

[LaBong]

I was bored and thought of irritating you. Gn.

 

[Bhairava]

Hey mate what about us ?? what is this commotion about N.E India not being part of India or some B.S. Let the BD members say what they wish to. Religion has nothing to do with being part of India .Mizoram is 100% christian and they are patriotic too if you don`t believe me ask Jeje lalpekhlua (if you don`t know him just google )...Bengali is majority population in Tripura and Southern Assam and every where there is this tribal or native population who is the majority.Muslim majority in Assam is just never going to happen .. don`t worry about that.. as for rebel and all that BS lemme give you one good news.. UPDS (a insurgent group from assam) has signed peace treaty with GOI yesterday paving way to peace and prosperity. People went nuts in Karbi anglong district when this was announced.This is the fate of every insurgent group here in N.EThe Sentinel

Buddy, I was answering these brainwashed Banglas that North East Indians don't want to live with India. It may have been so in the past, but not certainly in the present.

We know we made a few mistakes in North East India and neglected you people..but the Govt has woken up to that I hope they develop the North East also. And don't worry you are as Indian as any other from Kerala or Gujarat or Haryana.

 

[Bhairava]

What have we got to lose? Ever heard of law & order?

LOL two goondas fighting and killing each other actually improves the law & order in the long term.

Probably with Assam. What about the rest? Otherwise, your government won't be so adamant about the transit through Bangladesh.

About the rest ?

Sikkim - one of the most patriotic people in India
Arunachal - Sam as sikkim..infact these two states are represented in the Armed forces through the Sikkim ad Arunachal scouts raised on their popular demand.
Nagaland - Enjoys vast autonomy under Indian constitution and nobody talks of secession anymore
Meghalaya - one of the most peaceful states in whole of India
Mizoram - again one of the most peaceful after some initial disturbances. No known secession demand
Tripura - local goondas running some orgs. Not a big deal.
Manipur - Relatively the only 'disturbed' state and we know how to deal with it. Nothing great.

Capiche ?

No sources, no validity.

Give me one source that says that ULFA wants all ethnic Bengali Muslims out.

Genius , read up the charter of ULFA and see if they welcome the illegal migrants or not. They claim the legacy of the Hindu Ahom kingdom which defeated the Mughals. Decide for yourself.

I never said that in regards to Tripura. I thought you were referring to BD. In fact, BD does not claim any NE territory whatsoever.

I was referring to Tripura. In an answer to one of the 'intelligent' replies of your compatriot.