What's new

REVEALED: How an Indian missile lay unguarded at South Korean port

Aarush

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jan 27, 2014
Messages
1,174
Reaction score
-1
Country
India
Location
United States
Around 10 months ago, India had showcased its newly developed Pragati tactical surface-to-surface missile at the International Aerospace and Defence Exhibition ADEX-2013 in South Korea.

But in a major security lapse, the missile didn't make its journey back home and lay unguarded, vulnerable and dangerously exposed for an entire month at a South Korean port.

missil1_650_080714103549.jpg


The missile, developed by the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), has a range of 60-170 km.

India Today has learnt that the Modi government has sounded the code red and decided to investigate the entire matter. The government wants to revisit a never before security scare for India's missile programme.

Pragati is a highly potent and accurate short-range, battlefield tactical missile system capable of neutralising identified ground targets and providing an effective counter-force weapon system.

It has all weather day and night operational launch capability. It is a counter to Pakistan's NASR tactical nuclear missile and crucial in maintaining India's strategic edge over an unpredictable neighbour.

There is a series of violations in the journey of Pragati missile to South Korea.

The first violation is that the Pragati missile sent to South Korea for the exhibition wasn't a dummy missile but an actual prototype that was to be used for a live firing.

Second, the logistical handling of the missile in South Korea was outsourced to a local agent of Chinese-origin.

Third, the prototype missile missed its ship back to India, stranding it unguarded and vulnerable at the Incheon port for an entire month. Finally, it lumbered back to India as unprotected commercial cargo without the safeguards it needed as sensitive military hardware.

The Pragati missile has quick reaction from command to launch in ripple firing mode of less than five seconds from same launcher. It is capable of carrying various types of conventional warhead of approximately 200 Kg.

The missile system has capability of deployment in stand-alone mode or centralised mode. With its effective and intelligent end trajectory maneuvreing, Pragati defeats detection by any weapon locating radar.



REVEALED: How an Indian missile lay unguarded at South Korean port : India, News - India Today

jail and court martial for everyone involved in this......
 
. .
What was Anthony as Defense Minister doing ? How can this be referred to as a mere "security lapse" -- you mean our guys did not know about the missile and its import. If so, they should be sacked !

Bharat Mahan ke Mahan Negligence..
 
.
Man , the congress govt has fked India in so many ways , they should not get re-elected for another 1000 yrs. If anyone says this is not done directly by Anthony, still i believe , discipline is higher post to lower posts phenomena. If the minister is indecisive , how can you expects lower ranks to do otherwize. BTW a live missile, a fking live missile. who sent that.Idiots.
 
. .
Maybe they are mock ups. Following suggest that.

The first violation is that the Pragati missile sent to South Korea for the exhibition wasn't a dummy missile but an actual prototype that was to be used for a live firing.

Second, the logistical handling of the missile in South Korea was outsourced to a local agent of Chinese-origin.

Third, the prototype missile missed its ship back to India, stranding it unguarded and vulnerable at the Incheon port for an entire month. Finally, it lumbered back to India as unprotected commercial cargo without the safeguards it needed as sensitive military hardware

Source: REVEALED: How an Indian missile lay unguarded at South Korean port
 
.
I will say, negligence on part of logistics, but the question is, dont they do the inventory???
 
. . . .
Maybe they are mock ups. Following suggest that.

LOLLL. Maybe that Missile could have been targeted at the South Korean President's House at Seoul!!! :lol:
Much ado about nothing.......... the Missile had neither a Warhead nor any Propellant. Forget about DRDO; but any Commercial Shipping Line will not accept a Missile for shipment with a live warhead or propellant, that will cancel the insurance cover for the ship carrying the device. Even GoI, MoD cargo like the P-20 Styx Missiles carried from SU to India had to be de-armed before transit, and they were not even destined only to be exhibited some-where!!! :lol:

Additionally the GoI had to assume additional "Insurance Risk Cover" as a Sovereign Guarantee so that the Shipment could take place. Ditto for the case(s) when Uranium Reactor Fuel was shipped from USA to India in the 'old days' where everybody had to know what and in which condition the Cargo was being shipped. Even the Govt. of Egypt had to be notified since the cargo would be transiting Egypt (via Suez Canal). I am familiar with those instances, it is nothing like sending "a parcel of halwa-puri" to some-one some-where. Even in that case, 'conditions apply' as some folks here may be aware of.
Sorry to break your heart (and dreams); Aeronut....... :D
 
.
The first violation is that the Pragati missile sent to South Korea for the exhibition wasn't a dummy missile but an actual prototype that was to be used for a live firing.

Seriously ...... :hitwall:
 
.
Good gosh.
At least use a mock up
 
. .
I thought they use mockups for missile display until unless a host country want to see it in action.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom