What's new

Removal of Prof shows Pakistan has forgotten Jinnah’s view on Ahmadis: YLH

All he has 26 articles on economy which is nothing for a professor and other feather in his cap is that he is in 25 economists on IMF panels and if you read the books "Confessions of an economic hitman" by John Perkins, you will realise we are dealing with an economic hitman.
Furthermore, IK's vision is to follow the Madina state model for which a Qadyiani especially on IMF's payroll is not suitable at all. He is not even Pakistani national. He was born in an African country and then migrated to USA so he has two nationalities (Nigerian and US) so I don't think he has or can have 3rd nationality. Such economic information is highly sensitive and should not be exposed to people who are not even a Pakistani citizens. His faith issue has been overplayed anti-Pakistan elements so as to turn it into religious issue.


Stop barking you son of slum bitch and multiple slum dogs...who is baying for his blood..
so go back to your gay-rapestan.

I have more economic papers on PDF than him and my forecasting has been better than him so should I be on the council? Lol come on man quit the joke we need practical solution not some noob with theory. He is a journalist not an economist.
 
. .
he was just appointed as an adviser at first place. even many PTI leaders has no credentials to their name while now sitting in top seats. I even don't want to talk about CM Punjab here since its besides the point.

Bhai leave every thing and tell me the economic achievement of this Atif Mian what has he achieved for any economy. What is his practical experience. Very talented very talented. Show me his talent that this is what he has achieved? It has been 7 days I have tolerated your protest but now you are dining the same as mullahs and blocking pdf. So it is time to get some answers. Show his talent and experience.
 
.
What about the other 12 or so economists on the panel. Have they pulled any economy out of trouble. If that is not an issue with them, why is Atif mian an issue?

Face it, it is about the religion.

Regards


-Yes it is about the falsehood, religious beliefs of the Ahmadis called Qadianis for the obvious reason.

-They pretend to be the righteous Muslims and masquerading as the blessed one, the real Muslims with 'Munn-O -Salva' kind of claims by the Jews...and they disguise it that they don't believe the finality of the prophet-hood, claiming their Mirza Ahmad as the prophet and the Messiah. It is more about duplicity, shrewdness and falsehood here, from the Ahmadis.

-And they don't want to be called themselves as minorities like Christians, Hindus, Parsis Sikhs etc. do in Pakistan...the problem arises here, if they start accepting themselves as Ahmadis and a minority group, there is no problem here...the problem is the duplicity and the deception by calling themselves as Muslims and belonging to the Muslim community.
 
Last edited:
.
I have more economic papers on PDF than him and my forecasting has been better than him so should I be on the council? Lol come on man quit the joke we need practical solution not some noob with theory. He is a journalist not an economist.
:omghaha::omghaha::omghaha:
That was the best joke....rather the joke of the year...you are our balloon on PDF so full of..... yourself
 
.
I have more economic papers on PDF than him and my forecasting has been better than him so should I be on the council? Lol come on man quit the joke we need practical solution not some noob with theory. He is a journalist not an economist.

You should be on the EAC list as yours credentials are actually better....and after all this is just an Advisory council, like an honorary, voluntary thing, not an appointed permanent and paid job...
 
.
Yes it is about the falsehood religious beliefs of the Ahmadis called Qadianis for the obvious reason.

-They pretend to be the righteous Muslims and masquerading as the blessed one, the real Muslims with 'Munn-O -Salva' kind of claims by the Jews...and they disguise it that they don't believe the finality of the prophet-hood, claiming their Mirza Ahmad as the prophet and the Messiah. It is more about duplicity, shrewdness and falsehood here, from the Ahmadis.

-And they don't want to be called themselves as minorities like Christians, Hindus, Parsis Sikhs etc. do in Pakistan...the problem arises here, if they start accepting themselves as Ahmadis and a minority group, there is no problem here...the problem is the duplicity and the deception by calling themselves as Muslims and belong to the Muslim community.
Exactly, duplicity is the main issue. Otherwise a hindu was chief justice and none had issues..no one raised any voice against him rather people respected him and spoke highly of him.
 
.
:omghaha::omghaha::omghaha:
That was the best joke....rather the joke of the year...you are our balloon on PDF so full of..... yourself

You should be on the EAC list as yours credentials are actually better....and after all this is just an Advisory council, like an honorary, voluntary thing, not an appointed permanent and paid job...


Lol I was only joking man. To be practical the man has no experience and he is going to manage the future of 200 million people wow. I will recommend that Imran Khan should make him do internship in some bank so that he can learn and have practical experience. When ever you apply for a job the first question any one is asked is what is you experience and his answer was none. So this means he is talented a person who has proven nothing?
Make him the head of some university in Pakistan he can serve his country that way as well.
 
.
IMF final decision was to be made by Asad Umer and IK. Most he could had advised positively about IMF and that's it. Its not necessary premier and top ministers go with every word what advisers say. As said in some other thread, we need to discuss all point of views before making key decisions. There were other advisers as well, who may give opposite views than him.
Mate, different views are okay but there are reports that he is an emotional person and a zealot, he would have created a lot commotion and then quitted if his POV was not accepted. Also, he is very active Qadiyani who has a close link with their head quarters so that was a huge blunder and it have ended IK's govt. People had a lot of resentment. If someone cannot honour the sentiments of the majority, he has no right to rule it either.
 
. .
Exactly, duplicity is the main issue. Otherwise a hindu was chief justice and none had issues..no one raised any voice against him rather people respected him and spoke highly of him.


Also people citing Chaudhry Zafarullah Khan, the foreign minister appointed by Jinnah was also an Ahmadi doesn't holds much water as at that point in time Ahmadis were not proclaimed as non Muslims and as Qadianis and that was done in 1974, in Bhutto govt.

Also don't think Quaid knew anything about the duplicity and deception of the Mirzais/Ahmadis/Qadiani.



Quote:
The resolution in this regard was placed before the Assembly which was passed almost unanimously. An amendment called the Second Amendment was brought out and on September 7, 1974, Ahmadis were declared non-Muslims. For the first time the parliament passed Judgement on the beliefs of a community and declared it non-Muslim.
 
Last edited:
.
Also people citing Chaudhry Zafarullah Khan, the foreign minister appointed by Jinnah was also a Ahmadi doesn't holds much water as at that point in time Ahmadis were not proclaimed as non Muslims and as Qadianis and that was done in 1974, in Bhutto govt.

Also don't think Quaid knew anything about the duplicity and deception of the Mirzais/Ahmadis/Qadiani.



Quote:
The resolution in this regard was placed before the Assembly which was passed almost unanimously. An amendment called the Second Amendment was brought out and on September 7, 1974, Ahmadis were declared non-Muslims. For the first time the parliament passed Judgement on the beliefs of a community and declared it non-Muslim.
He played a major role in distancing Pakistan from USSR and making it fall in the lap of the West ...instead of acting neutral.

Relations with USSR would have helped Pakistan immensely due to the geographical proximity. He did it because of the vested interests of his community.

Also, he declined to attend the funeral prayer of the same man who appointed him i.e. Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah.
 
.
Also don't think Quaid knew anything about the duplicity and deception of the Mirzais/Ahmadis/Qadiani.

I am certain he did know. Afterall, my great grandfather was sitting next to him on many occasions.

On topic: Only a retard denies the contribution of Ahmadis to Pakistan. This forum being full of retarded intellectual dwarves who pass themselves off as savants of wisdom and all that is holy.

Guess the question of loyalty to Pakistan doesn't arise when they take a bullet to the head in operations in South Waziristan. Only when it comes to taking public office.
 
.
I am certain he did know. Afterall, my great grandfather was sitting next to him on many occasions.

Who is this great person, I am clueless here.

As for Quaid knowing Zafarullah Khan as being an Ahmadi...obviously he must knew it, I was talking about the nitty gritty and the duplicity how they work as a cult with deceit and deception, and that Qadianis were proclaimed non Muslims in 1974, that was my point.

So you think others at this forum are retarded intellectuals and you aren't one of them...chest thumping/self boasting itself is a form of low mental faculties.
 
.
Bhai leave every thing and tell me the economic achievement of this Atif Mian what has he achieved for any economy. What is his practical experience. Very talented very talented. Show me his talent that this is what he has achieved? It has been 7 days I have tolerated your protest but now you are dining the same as mullahs and blocking pdf. So it is time to get some answers. Show his talent and experience.

why should I answer to such an irrelevant question at first place ?
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom