Bratva
PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2010
- Messages
- 13,832
- Reaction score
- 67
- Country
- Location
Isn't it correct that the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community believes that God sent Ahmad, like Jesus, to end religious wars, condemn bloodshed and reinstitute morality, justice and peace? They believe that he divested Islam of fanatical beliefs and practices by championing what is in their view, Islams true and essential teachings as practiced by the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) himself.
So if they're propagating Islams true and essential teachings as practiced by the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), then what's the reason for not allowed them to propagate their religious views publicly? They are not denigrating Islam in any way, are they?
Further, Ahmad was a Mujaddid (Islamic Reformer) of the 19th century. He is referred to as a 'prophet' in the metaphorical sense only (as other recognized Islamic saints and Sufis are similarly referred to), not a prophet in the technical meaning of the word.
So why are Ahmadis not considered a sect of Islam?
Do excuse a Hindu for his ignorance!!
that's where you are wrong. If he was a reformer, all religious wars should have been stopped, morality,justice equality would be the trade mark of mother earth now but what happen? Nothing. Here goes his false claim number one he is a Reformer. Since you don't know the what kind of reformer All muslims believe in. This is the first reformer of Islam and every reformer are only human beings and none of them is given prophet status .
Umar II - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Now the flaw in argument. As you said Like Jesus, This is second major conflict we have with Ahmaddiya, they consider their Leader Jesus and on the basis of this he was labeled prophet.
Third flaw. Ahmaddiya Islamic beliefs and teachings are way off the mark. What Prophet Mohammad (P.B.U.H) taught us to do and what Ahmadis practice is totally different. Their prayers, Their fasting and other teachings are totally different of what all majority Muslims follow. So they corrupted the teachings of Islam instead of purifying them.
Last flaw in the argument. No, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad didn't said prophet in metaphorical sense, and the proof is whatever the book written by him or by his followers, they all refered to him in technical sense not in metaphorical sense. Mirza Ghulam claimed Jesus soul has overtaken him and he will purify the whole world and since Jesus is inside him so he is prophet. that's where the conflict started!
And your last paragraph. They changed their stance and start claiming mriza ghulam ahmad as Reformer once they were declard non muslims in Pakistan. Before that they always use to claim as Prophet.