Possible Solution to the Kashmir Issue

[IsThisNameAvailable]

Seems this one is very bitter about his own faith and feels inferior to us.

 

[krash]

We will see who will win and who will lose.

Another statement which only the losing side would hold on to. Those with a little knowledge of history or basic common sense would instead wager on the fact that no people in the entirety of mankind's history have ever been ruled over by any foreign entity against their will for any reasonable stretch of time. Indians and Pakistanis rid themselves of the greatest empire that had ever been in less than 200 years.

Kashmiri's ridding themselves of India is only inevitable, natural.

And maybe even die rather than surrendering.

I don't blame you. Not many posses the character to admire the will of the righteous. Also the reason why you fail to subdue them.

But few have the special quality of surrendering first, then feeling proud in being part of the conqueror and trying to feel like "winner". Nevermind.

I know, right? Imagine their state that their own would rather join the supposed conquerors.

My point was not limited to Kashmir. It was much bigger. It was about a GL, any GL

Should have been, seeing as how you were directly responding to my statement about the atrocities being committed against Kashmiris by the state of India.

Regardless, your argument still remains defunct and archaic, as already explained in my previous posts. Also still stands opposed to the fact that most of what is India today was foreign to it once. Otherwise, the song and dance around the "largest democracy in the world", Mughal Architecture, Cricket, movies, and indoor plumbing would surely need to stop.

(Kashmir may be your raw nerve which u dream about day & night. It will go nowhere from where it is today. Give your dreams a rest)

Only if it helps you sleep better.

So the geogrophical landmass which is called pakistan today, has no identity called 'islam'?
(You can say either Yes or No or dodge like you did on the question 'Are human beings killer in general?")

I don't believe you understood what was meant by "geographical concept" (Not "geographical landmass", btw, since all landmasses are geographic). I would advise going through my post again. India, until the invasion of the British and to a fair extent during their rule as well, was a geographical concept akin to the "Middle East", "Scandenavia", "North Africa", "Oceania", "Caribbean", "Far East", "Central America", among others. "India" before the British = "South Asia" today =/ "The State of India" today. Geographical concepts do not have identities by definition, they are based on geographic features. They don't have any political will either. Pakistan and the modern State of India, otoh, are political entities and hence have identities and political will. Islam is a part of Pakistan's identity today.