Haris Ali2140
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 20, 2019
- Messages
- 4,143
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
It will take the fun out of the PDF.If the same could be applied to PDF.. that would be great .
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It will take the fun out of the PDF.If the same could be applied to PDF.. that would be great .
No problem, watch pink panther for funIt will take the fun out of the PDF.
FATF is likely to go, your side is throwing every possible excuse in the book at them and that is delaying but not stopping the removal of Pakistan from Blacklist and eventually Grey list.
Frankly, the hate filled efforts from your current government are actually changing things for the better here.
FATF has much less effects on militant financing than money laundering by the corrupt and tax evasion.
@waz @Oscar please deal with this idiot who is so ashamed of showing his flags.This was a thread on a particular purchase, which I am sure has gone through a lot of research by the military before being finalized. Why do you post random comments trying to be an expert? BTW how IDs do you have in this forum?
Pantsir Fires on the move which is suitable for armored warfare. Lets see if its inducted to counter CBU-105 threat.
And why wouldn't Russians use it? Are you expecting 70% intercept rate?It's a American propaganda/feel good Youtuber...what would you expect.
At 19%....why would even the Russians use it?
It has no value in that scenario. The heat seeker skeets of the CBU will deploy by the time it gets within range of the CBU 105.Pantsir Fires on the move which is suitable for armored warfare. Lets see if its inducted to counter CBU-105 threat.
Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck.I'm a Pakistani American lol...did you just assume I am Indian?
Why would it be a military secret? What makes you say that this purchase was supposed to be a secret?So military secrets are divulged like candy these days?
Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck.
And why wouldn't Russians use it? Are you expecting 70% intercept rate?
Surface defenses have been found to be effective up to a maximum of 31% in real-time engagement scenarios throughout history.
19% effectiveness rate sound realistic....
However, up against a well-equipped military force, don't ask. Just ask Syrians how many Israeli strikes have gotten through.
I agree. You need the JF-17 in the air to force the Jaguar to fly -- and launch lower -- as well.It has no value in that scenario. The heat seeker skeets of the CBU will deploy by the time it gets within range of the CBU 105.
The best weapon is to have a LOMADs keeping those aircraft either out of range of deployment or forcing them to fly low and reduce range of weapons; where something like the Pantsir handles them.
Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck.
Well there is another threat Pakistan armor needs to counter.I agree. You need the JF-17 in the air to force the Jaguar to fly -- and launch lower -- as well.
That said, one way to partly mitigate the CBU-105 is to attach a modern SPAAG, especially one with air burst rounds. It won't offer 100% protection, but as a layer, it might cull a few of the skeets, if not whole BLU-108s.
The final piece is a hard-kill active protection system (APS) to each tank. The challenge with this, however, is that you need one that can take on top attack threats. It might not even be a good use of money (to try APS against a skeet); so the simpler alternative is to operate in thinner and sparsely distributed formations.
Instead of building up numbers, I wish the Army would pivot the Haider MBT project into a next-gen solution for a guided-threat heavy (CBU-105, ATGMs, etc) environment. This is where hard-kill APS, being able to see an aerial radar feed (via a fighter, drone, or stand-off ISR aircraft), controlling semi-autonomous UGVs armed with ATGMs, etc, is perhaps more worthwhile than trying to get a tank that's too similar to what AK2 is supposed to offer.
One thing Ukraine is doing (and I bring them up a lot because, well, they're one of a few who are openly willing to talk to us) is developing a next-gen tank with a heavy automation, i.e., a crew of 2 and an unmanned turret. Perhaps such an MBT of that nature could be better suited for a CBU-105/ATGM heavy battlefield -- losing the turret to a top-attack munition might not mean the end of the MBT.
Well there is another threat Pakistan armor need to counter.
AH-64E, equipped with longbow FCS.
Pantsir purchase is more likely meant to counter low flying anti tank platforms of India. Being wheeled system we can assume that it will move to Punjab sector, and this is where IAF will be deploying its one squadron of AH-64E, i.e in Pathankot.