Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion

[expert]

https://tribune.com.pk/story/1464456/pm-admits-employment-uae-based-firm/?amp=1

PMLN got JIT stopped for any further investigation, and then rebuts their report stating errors by Standard Chartered Bank's officer, followed by their contention that UAE Govt could have made mistake, before it was typographical errors in elections, so on and so forth!

This test tube error product gets caught and succesfully puts the responsibility of error/omission on others; and he gets away too - E V E R Y T I M E

If he gets away from being disqualified using those arguments, it will become obvious that not everyone is treated the same under the law in pakistan. The next time someone is caught murdering, he will just say it was a mistake--the gun's aim didn't work.

 

[Realistic Change]

i've heard Kh. Asif is strong contender for PM in case NS is disqualified ... do you have any intel on this ....

He is Nawaz's one of the top choices. He enjoys confidence of his immediate family members as well.

If he gets away from being disqualified using those arguments, it will become obvious that not everyone is treated the same under the law in pakistan. The next time someone is caught murdering, he will just say it was a mistake--the gun's aim didn't work.

Yehi tou rona hai! It's not an issue of haves and have nots - issue is different yardstick for application of law on people with surname of $harif and different if it's Gilani or Bhutto or Khan or any other surname.

Pakistan's system investigates a person who brings money into Pakistan for possible money laundering, and same system says that in the hindsight it seems that there was no misuse of power by the PM and property bought by 19 year old son who magically earned and paid $8 million to buy flats and still there is no need to suspect any wrongdoing.

 

[QatariPrince]

https://twitter.com/x/status/889022635501379584

PM kay against aur CM Pubjab key favour main banners lag gaye

 

[The Accountant]

Will SC bring back Musharraf to face trial?

bhai SC q lay ga yeh tu tmahry NS ki respons

He is Nawaz's one of the top choices. He enjoys confidence of his immediate family members as well.



Yehi tou rona hai! It's not an issue of haves and have nots - issue is different yardstick for application of law on people with surname of $harif and different if it's Gilani or Bhutto or Khan or any other surname.

Pakistan's system investigates a person who brings money into Pakistan for possible money laundering, and same system says that in the hindsight it seems that there was no misuse of power by the PM and property bought by 19 year old son who magically earned and paid $8 million to buy flats and still there is no need to suspect any wrongdoing.

I slightly disagree the system treated all the surname with money and power equally ... So in past action against Bhutto's and Gillani's and even NS was by some hidden motives of local or international establishment ... This is first time where accountability of any person is being done out of pressure from opposition and public on merit thats the reason it is taking time ...

In the previous period disqualification of Gilani was to save Zardari same is the case today as we have seen Perwaiz Ashraf being removed to save MN ...

It is about BADMASHIYA ... A group of criminals for whom politics is to support their tyranny ...

Why they are so much against IK where chances of he doing corruption are remote .. as max corruption he could do is tax evading (which is also difficult as most of his income is from formal institutes like PCB and county circket who are doing tax deduction at source ...

On the other hand cases of their worst opponents like Zardari, Altaf even Musharaf are not being given any importance and are just being continued for black mailing ,,, they dont want these 2 be concluded as it is mutual understanding between this badmashiya ,,, you scratch my back i scratch yours ...

I have no faith in IK as a good administrator but he will IA bring the system of accountability and strengthening of the institutes ... Look what we achieved while we were strengthening the crook Iftikhar Chaudhry but as a result Institute of SC has become so much powerful that it is questioning one of the most powerful sitting PM on merit alone and he cannot do anything about it ...

 

[Realistic Change]

bhai SC q lay ga yeh tu tmahry NS ki respons

I slightly disagree the system treated all the surname with money and power equally ... So in past action against Bhutto's and Gillani's and even NS was by some hidden motives of local or international establishment ... This is first time where accountability of any person is being done out of pressure from opposition and public on merit thats the reason it is taking time ...

In the previous period disqualification of Gilani was to save Zardari same is the case today as we have seen Perwaiz Ashraf being removed to save MN ...

It is about BADMASHIYA ... A group of criminals for whom politics is to support their tyranny ...

Why they are so much against IK where chances of he doing corruption are remote .. as max corruption he could do is tax evading (which is also difficult as most of his income is from formal institutes like PCB and county circket who are doing tax deduction at source ...

On the other hand cases of their worst opponents like Zardari, Altaf even Musharaf are not being given any importance and are just being continued for black mailing ,,, they dont want these 2 be concluded as it is mutual understanding between this badmashiya ,,, you scratch my back i scratch yours ...

I have no faith in IK as a good administrator but he will IA bring the system of accountability and strengthening of the institutes ... Look what we achieved while we were strengthening the crook Iftikhar Chaudhry but as a result Institute of SC has become so much powerful that it is questioning one of the most powerful sitting PM on merit alone and he cannot do anything about it ...

I haven't stated that system treated all with different surnames equally.

Let me say it more clearly; If your surname is $harif - this system will protect you.

The system is weaved in a very systematic order to protect $harifs- it's a fact and I will prove it with hundreds of instances like Model Town, Gadani Ship Breaking, PSM in last tenure, DAWN leaks, Disqualification case of Nawaz vs BB, same allegations and only $harif gets reinstated while BB gets what kangaroo courts did.

I can give you solid strategy how each bureaucrat is posted and how he is controlled to reap benefits, but it's almost 2:00am .....so until next time!

Enjoy Ch Nisar's presser drama

 

[The Accountant]

I haven't stated that system treated all with different surnames equally.

Let me say it more clearly; If your surname is $harif - this system will protect you.

The system is weaved in a very systematic order to protect $harifs- it's a fact and I will prove it with hundreds of instances like Model Town, Gadani Ship Breaking, PSM in last tenure, DAWN leaks, Disqualification case of Nawaz vs BB, same allegations and only $harif gets reinstated while BB gets what kangaroo courts did.

I can give you solid strategy how each bureaucrat is posted and how he is controlled to reap benefits, but it's almost 2:00am .....so until next time!

Enjoy Ch Nisar's presser drama

Here I am disagreeing with you ... Its not about Sharief sirname but its is all about irch and powerful ... Bhutto case was different, she was in a confrontation with establishment all the time due to her father whereas NS was always an establishment guy till Musharaf ...

Look at Zardari, He avoided confrontation with the establishment and he survived even longer than zardari ...

Unofortuanelty our establishment in the past is not behind politicians when it comes to miss use of authoirty and manipulating power ...

My point they are all the same ,, Sharif's, Zardari's, Gilani's and probably few of them are in PTI as well ... dont fall for it , that it was about the sirname of province of origin but about how you were dealing with establishment and bureaucracy and NS had always played well ... On the contrary Bhutto's are not good at playing with establishment and bureaucracy ,,, They do popular politics to make people happy mainly by giving gov jobs, and social schemes

 

[Shane]

He is Nawaz's one of the top choices. He enjoys confidence of his immediate family members as well.



Yehi tou rona hai! It's not an issue of haves and have nots - issue is different yardstick for application of law on people with surname of $harif and different if it's Gilani or Bhutto or Khan or any other surname.

Pakistan's system investigates a person who brings money into Pakistan for possible money laundering, and same system says that in the hindsight it seems that there was no misuse of power by the PM and property bought by 19 year old son who magically earned and paid $8 million to buy flats and still there is no need to suspect any wrongdoing.

It is not the people involved in corruption that is the only cancer in our society, it is also those who knowingly support it, like K Asifs. He knows fully well the depth of NS commission mafia yet he considers him to be his own source of survival. The list of such people around NS is well known.

Every single educated person in Pakistan whether PMLN supporter or not now knows deep down that NS is corrupt. PMLN Leaders themselves know his family is out to hide his corruption yet they choose to support them using lame excuses and whataboutism to satisfy their false ego.

When leaders like KAsif knowingly support such people who have been sucking the life blood from the country and weakening its very roots, how can they justify it by whataboutism? But it seems their own ego comes in the way of loyalty to the motherland.

Talk to educated PMLN supporters and they say that at least he made metros, motorways and what not.

And so on a typical argument with a N leagui goes...

He gave away free laptops and sasti roti - while human life kept being lost to floods for unavailability of funds to strengthen river banks and gave away billions to partners in the name of circular debt with just a signature of Dar without any oversight.

He installed power plants like Nandipur - a fiasco still costing us billions in repair and maintenance.

He spent billions on CPEC - and diverted billions of CPEC on off-route Orange Train as mothers gave births in hospital floors.

So what if he got commission doing all this so what...unlike Zardari who eats away everything at least Nawaz have projects on grounds.

So some people like me resort to sarcasm that yeah you are right so what if he has been looting us for 35 years at least he has transformed his family business from a single jointly owned steel unit to 30 plus units and then shifted his wealth abroad...so what if he has was just a common millionaire like thousands of other Pakistani businessmen and become a billionaire after coming into power? So what if he makes a fool out of ordinary people at least he throws some scraps around for people to pickup and thank him for his generosity and making Pakistan prosper.

I hope people set aside their egos and vote for Pakistan instead of those who prefer to do business with Indian tycoon friends over the dead bodies of Kashmiri youth. It's just about voting and supporting the least of the evils.

 

[Devil Soul]

Mansoor Ali Khan‏Verified account @_Mansoor_Ali 8m8 minutes ago
Has the JIT committed this blunder?

Qamber Zaidi‏ @qamber_zaidi
#Pm said he declared his UAE employment in nomination papers of 2013.the most crucial point which would help judges in deciding disqualifctn

 

[expert]

He is Nawaz's one of the top choices. He enjoys confidence of his immediate family members as well.



Yehi tou rona hai! It's not an issue of haves and have nots - issue is different yardstick for application of law on people with surname of $harif and different if it's Gilani or Bhutto or Khan or any other surname.

Pakistan's system investigates a person who brings money into Pakistan for possible money laundering, and same system says that in the hindsight it seems that there was no misuse of power by the PM and property bought by 19 year old son who magically earned and paid $8 million to buy flats and still there is no need to suspect any wrongdoing.

The thing is that now that

Mansoor Ali Khan‏Verified account @_Mansoor_Ali 8m8 minutes ago
Has the JIT committed this blunder?

Qamber Zaidi‏ @qamber_zaidi
#Pm said he declared his UAE employment in nomination papers of 2013.the most crucial point which would help judges in deciding disqualifctn

He has only submitted his visa page which does not mention his employment. He has not submitted his employment details. Does anyone have the 25 page reply? It seems like the PM is trying to get away on technical grounds.

In any case, the problem lies here:

“Similarly, Respondent No 1 did not withdraw the salary of AED 10,000. Thus, the salary shown in the Employment Contract in effect never constituted an ‘asset’ for Respondent No 1.

Are salaries withdrawn or paid in?

 

[Devil Soul]

The thing is that now that


He has only submitted his visa page which does not mention his employment. He has not submitted his employment details. Does anyone have the 25 page reply? It seems like the PM is trying to get away on technical grounds.

Bro check other pic's shared.....

 

[expert]

Bro check other pic's shared.....

That's the media report and the claim made by the lawyer. Nowhere on the passport page does it say he was the chairman or ever had employment. They're saying that because the Iqama copy was attached, he did not hide his chairmanship. That will be for the judges to decide.

The only reason they submitted the reply AFTER the hearing was over is because no objections could be raised by the petitioners. I think it would not be fair if a judgement in favour of Nawaz would be reached without hearing counter-arguments.

 

[Emmie]

This safa is is now being relied.

 

[Devil Soul]

That's the media report and the claim made by the lawyer. Nowhere on the passport page does it say he was the chairman or ever had employment. They're saying that because the Iqama copy was attached, he did not hide his chairmanship. That will be for the judges to decide.

The only reason they submitted the reply AFTER the hearing was over is because no objections could be raised by the petitioners. I think it would not be fair if a judgement in favour of Nawaz would be fair without hearing counter-arguments.

Well its up to the judges to decided, but this last min submission brings a new twist thou

 

[QatariPrince]

چودھری نثار نے کمر میں تکلیف کےباعث پریس کانفرنس ملتوی کردی

 

[El Sidd]

Well its up to the judges to decided, but this last min submission brings a new twist thou

What twist man?

All this drama over a simple constitutional day at work.

Stop making the case political.