What's new

Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Implementation bench ke kisi bhi member judge ka DQ ka faisla automatically 5 member bench main shamil ho hi nahi sakta.. yeh aik different bench hai... yeh tou aisay hi hogaya ke 2 benches 2 different, but similar cases par kaam kar rahi hon, aur aik bench doosri bench ke verdict ko apni bench main shamil karley..

Yeh qanoon ke saath mazak hojaega..

3 member bench alag faisla dega (faislay se ziada recommendations kahain tou behtar hai), aur 5 member bench uss ko review karega..

Iss tarah PM ke counsel ne jo yeh aitraaz uthaya tha January main ke SC ki bench agar disqualify kardeti hai tou PM ke paas appeal karnay ka bhi ikhtiar nahi.. woh bhi khatam hojaega..

Hmmm...

Acha ek baat jo main ne point out..ki..jab tak implementation bench ki hearing chal rahi thee.,special bench..tu SC ki website par ...for implementation of court order panama case hearing hoti thee..aur uske saath application by JIT ya hussain nawaz hoti thee

Ab jab se JIT report ke baad hearing horahi hai....tu ye petition tu hai hi bench ke pass...for implementation of order of panama case..uske saath saath constituition petition no 29,30 jo original panama case ki petition hai..woh bhi is bench ne li hui hai...iska. Kia matlab hosakta hai? Check SC website
 
. . .
Iss faislay ki bhi koi nazeer nahi milti.. Kabhi aaj tak SC ne JIT bana kar apnay hi under main kaam nahi karwaya..

Justice Wajeeh uddin ke mutabiq, 2 judges apna faisla change karsaktay hain..



I haven't watched it.. When was it aired?
It was in 90s during the first BB govt.
 
. .
this question was cleared in sc today
same bench will hear / and deliver judgement,

ARY had same interpretation after today's hearing which u mentioned, from judges remarks..

But Amir Mateen and Mohd Malick from channel 92 who also attended today's proceedinges in SC.. Refered to J Ijazul Ahsan's remarks ...tht earlier verdict to be an interim order..and tht we can still refer to the material given in previous bench.. Amir mateen said ke iska matlab final verdict 5 member bench hi dey ga
 
.
Hmmm...

Acha ek baat jo main ne point out..ki..jab tak implementation bench ki hearing chal rahi thee.,special bench..tu SC ki website par ...for implementation of court order panama case hearing hoti thee..aur uske saath application by JIT ya hussain nawaz hoti thee

Ab jab se JIT report ke baad hearing horahi hai....tu ye petition tu hai hi bench ke pass...for implementation of order of panama case..uske saath saath constituition petition no 29,30 jo original panama case ki petition hai..woh bhi is bench ne li hui hai...iska. Kia matlab hosakta hai? Check SC website

Iss ka mujhay koi idea nahi hai.. agar sirf SC ki numbering ko dekha jaey tou implementation bench hi sab kuchh hai aur 5 member bench has been dissolved..

Iss liey main numbering pe ziada dhiyan nahi deta..

It was in 90s during the first BB govt.

Which one?

Sab log yehi keh rahay hain ke it is one of its kind judgment.
 
.
This article answers many questions regarding FZE Capital . @PakSword @Farah Sohail and others

A Dubai law firm has submitted a legal opinion to Pakistan's Supreme Court on Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's alleged employment in Dubai, verifying that the employment documents which imply he was employed by Capital FZE in Jebel Ali Freezone (Jafza) in Dubai until 2014 are 100 per cent legal.

The legal firm Khalifa bin Huwaidan Advocates was consulted by the Joint Investigation Team (JIT) that has submitted a 254-page report to the Pakistan's Supreme Court into Nawaz' family wealth.

The court held its first hearing on Monday to decide the fate of the prime minister who is contesting the corruption investigation. He has denied any wrong doing.

The Dubai law firm submitted its report to the Supreme Court on Monday, Khalifa bin Huwaidan, lawyer and legal advisor at the firm, told Khaleej Times.

"Normally businessmen establish companies in Dubai if they want to maintain a visa status in the company but in this case, (Nawaz Sharif) was an employee in a Jafza-based firm," he confirmed.

Khalifa's conclusion was based on the copy of the labour contract Nawaz had with Capital FZE, and said "The contract is 100 per cent legal."

The legal opinion has been readied based on the UAE labour laws, he said. It earlier emerged that Nawaz Sharif was employed as chairman of the board for Capital FZE company in Jafza from August 2006 to April 2014 and was withdrawing a salary of Dh10,000. However, his employment status was terminated in 2014 after the company was dissolved. This was a year after he became the prime minister of Pakistan for the third time.

The Sharif family has denied that a salary was withdrawn and said that the visa was to facilitate visits to the UAE. However, as per the UAE Labour Law, all employees have to receive a salary through a bank account under the UAE's Wage Protection System (WPS), failing which the firm can be blacklisted and shut down.

Also as per the UAE law, if no record of a salary transfer to the bank is found, the employer is held liable not the employee. However, it is not clear who owned Capital FZE before it was dissolved.

Hussain Nawaz, son of Nawaz Sharif has rejected the JIT findings that his father was being paid by the Dubai firm. He said that his father never received any salary from the aforesaid company. Hussain said that his father was appointed as chairman only for facilitation of visa and visits to the UAE in 2006.

The JIT report has also revealed that Nawaz did not disclose this information before running for the highest public office in 2013 which is against the Constitution of Pakistan. The JIT findings are based on its correspondence with Jafza.

A legal opinion from a Dubai firm verifying the legality of the employment contract will leave no room for Nawaz to contest this in court.

This result is also likely to impact the case against the Sharifs, which are being probed after the Panama Papers revealed in 2016 that three of his children owned offshore companies and assets not shown on his family's wealth statement. The assets in question include four expensive flats in Park Lane, London.

http://www.khaleejtimes.com/interna...s-pakistani-pms-jafza-job-papers-as-100-legal
 
. .
Iss ka mujhay koi idea nahi hai.. agar sirf SC ki numbering ko dekha jaey tou implementation bench hi sab kuchh hai aur 5 member bench has been dissolved..

Iss liey main numbering pe ziada dhiyan nahi deta..

Nahi.. Aap ne dekha ke..is bench ke saamnay...JIT report ke neechay...pehle implementation of order panama case ..aur phir const pettion no 29, 30 by IK, Sirajul Haq aur Sheikh Rahsid bhi hai? Jo pehle nahi hoti theen......? S rf implementation of order tak hota tha ya agar koi aur application by JIT ya Hasan Nawaz..lekin orginal const petition no 29, 30 kabhi bhi special bench ke under nahi hoti thee.. Ye jab se JIT report par hearing horahi hai.lus waqt se original const petition of panama case bhi ..is bench ke under hai.....?

Which one?

Sab log yehi keh rahay hain ke it is one of its kind judgment.

He is talking abt PTV drama zard dopahar
 
.
Nahi.. Aap ne dekha ke..is bench ke saamnay...JIT report ke neechay...pehle implementation of order panama case ..aur phir const pettion no 29, 30 by IK, Sirajul Haq aur Sheikh Rahsid bhi hai? Jo pehle nahi hoti theen......? S rf implementation of order tak hota tha ya agar koi aur application by JIT ya Hasan Nawaz..lekin orginal const petition no 29, 30 kabhi bhi special bench ke under nahi hoti thee.. Ye jab se JIT report par hearing horahi hai.lus waqt se original const petition of panama case bhi ..is bench ke under hai.....?

No idea about it..

He is talking abt PTV drama zard dopahar

Lolz.. Mujhay lagta hai mujhay neend aarahi hai..
 
.

True. It keeps popping up in my head, the ruling about JIT to complete packup from Judicial Academy in 10 days and it also coincides with the same. Then there was a mention during current proceedings of receiving replies for MLA requests by JIT.

But in any case, due process is being followed to the letter and it takes time, not too long though, and if the speculations are correct, just as well.

The political vultures are out and about attending SC proceedings, the nay sayers and all. Indication enough that a kill is all but made. Funny how everyone of these vultures/ opportunists were sceptical of IK strategy even among PTI leadership.

No one can take any credit away from IK for keeping Panama Gate alive.

While the killer licks his battle scars, the scavengers are out to steal the lions share. The people must realise that we need to move on from this game of PPP and PML-N/S/Q coalitions and taking turns but what to expect from a people who elect the same old in turns but an actual miracle but i think IK deserves a Kiani like spin this time around.
 
.
Implementation bench ke kisi bhi member judge ka DQ ka faisla automatically 5 member bench main shamil ho hi nahi sakta.. yeh aik different bench hai... yeh tou aisay hi hogaya ke 2 benches 2 different, but similar cases par kaam kar rahi hon, aur aik bench doosri bench ke verdict ko apni bench main shamil karley..

Yeh qanoon ke saath mazak hojaega..

3 member bench alag faisla dega (faislay se ziada recommendations kahain tou behtar hai), aur 5 member bench uss ko review karega..

Iss tarah PM ke counsel ne jo yeh aitraaz uthaya tha January main ke SC ki bench agar disqualify kardeti hai tou PM ke paas appeal karnay ka bhi ikhtiar nahi.. woh bhi khatam hojaega..
Just heard Sardar Latif Khosa on ARY in power play.

1. He explained that the JIT was formed not because the 3 judges wanted to dismiss the case against NS but instead to give them (NS) again a chance to submit proof or to establish the money trail.
2. First 2 judges already gaved their verdict and if NS and family had provided any proof which establishes the money trail ONLY then the first 2 judges would have changed their decision on the newly given evidences.
So as far as I understood him, the verdict rests on the implementation bench.
3. He also said that now the bench have to consider the DQ of NS as stated in their interim order.
 
.
2. First 2 judges already gaved their verdict and if NS and family had provided any proof which establishes the money trail ONLY then the first 2 judges would have changed their decision on the newly given evidences.
So as far as I understood him, the verdict rests on the implementation bench.

So, they can amend their verdict.. yehi tou hum bhi keh rahay hain..

3. He also said that now the bench have to consider the DQ of NS as stated in their interim order.

But will this judgment have any impact on the original judgment? This is our question.. So if only one judge disqualifies, what will happen then?
 
. .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom