Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion

[Farah Sohail]

To be honest, aaj ke remarks mere upar se guzar gaey.. jitni grilling main expect kar raha tha utni nahi huee.

Aaj jo PM ke lawyer ne ye FZE wali baat accept kar hai ke PM ka iqama bhi tha aur ye company wali documents accept kar li hai.. Ye sab se damaging hai.. Ab mere khyal main advocate aur pakora judge ke liye bhi disqualification se bachaana bhtt mushkil hoga..

I think disqualification tu ab almost pakki hai.. Ab baat criminal cases ki hai.. Infact forgery ke cases ki.. Us main advocate aur pakora chahay tu bachaa saktay hain ke forgery ke cases register karnay ko na kahein.. Us issue ko ignore kar dein.. Jaisy aaj trust deed ka pakora judge ne zikr kia ke us par bhi kafi sawaalat uth gaye hain.. Sawaalat uthnay se kia matlab hai? Forensic firm ne keh diya ke woh fake aur fabricated hai.. Pakora judge keh rahay hain ke sawaalat uth gaye hain.. JIT keh rahi hai baji par criminal case banYein.. Pakora abhi tak shayad forgery ko accept nahi karrahay..bas sawaal uth gaye hain.. Bhaii..jali documents thay.sabit hochuka hai...forgery ka case banayein...

Ab jo ek favor reh gaya hai ..jo pakora aur advocate de saktay hain..woh ye ke forgery ke case ko accept na karein ...infact usay disputed fact qarar de dein..aur baji ko is par kuch na kahein...

Is liye main chahti thee ke kash JIT report ..Justice Khosa aur Justice Gulzar bhi review karsaktay Lekin lagta ye hai ke final verdict tu Justice Khosa hi announce karein ge..lekin woh shayad JIT report ki basis par kuch addition nahi karsaktay previous verdict main.. Lagta kuch aisa hi hai.. Afsos bhtt horaha hai mujhe iss baat ka...

Pakora aur advocate shayad baji ko forgery ke cases main bachaa saktay hain lekin NS ko disqualification se nahi bachaa saktay

 

[Realistic Change]

Chalo - wahan bhi khabar pohonch gai hai

http://m.khaleejtimes.com/internati...s-pakistani-pms-jafza-job-papers-as-100-legal

Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif leaves the premises of Joint Investigation Team in Islamabad, Pakistan
A Dubai law firm has submitted a legal opinion to Pakistan's Supreme Court on Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's alleged employment in Dubai, verifying that the employment documents which imply he was employed by Capital FZE in Jebel Ali Freezone (Jafza) in Dubai until 2014 are 100 per cent legal.

The legal firm Khalifa bin Huwaidan Advocates was consulted by the Joint Investigation Team (JIT) that has submitted a 254-page report to the Pakistan's Supreme Court into Nawaz' family wealth.

The court held its first hearing on Monday to decide the fate of the prime minister who is contesting the corruption investigation. He has denied any wrong doing.

The Dubai law firm submitted its report to the Supreme Court on Monday, Khalifa bin Huwaidan, lawyer and legal advisor at the firm, told Khaleej Times.

"Normally businessmen establish companies in Dubai if they want to maintain a visa status in the company but in this case, (Nawaz Sharif) was an employee in a Jafza-based firm," he confirmed.

Khalifa's conclusion was based on the copy of the labour contract Nawaz had with Capital FZE, and said "The contract is 100 per cent legal."

The legal opinion has been readied based on the UAE labour laws, he said. It earlier emerged that Nawaz Sharif was employed as chairman of the board for Capital FZE company in Jafza from August 2006 to April 2014 and was withdrawing a salary of Dh10,000. However, his employment status was terminated in 2014 after the company was dissolved. This was a year after he became the prime minister of Pakistan for the third time.

The Sharif family has denied that a salary was withdrawn and said that the visa was to facilitate visits to the UAE. However, as per the UAE Labour Law, all employees have to receive a salary through a bank account under the UAE's Wage Protection System (WPS), failing which the firm can be blacklisted and shut down.

Also as per the UAE law, if no record of a salary transfer to the bank is found, the employer is held liable not the employee. However, it is not clear who owned Capital FZE before it was dissolved.

Hussain Nawaz, son of Nawaz Sharif has rejected the JIT findings that his father was being paid by the Dubai firm. He said that his father never received any salary from the aforesaid company. Hussain said that his father was appointed as chairman only for facilitation of visa and visits to the UAE in 2006.

The JIT report has also revealed that Nawaz did not disclose this information before running for the highest public office in 2013 which is against the Constitution of Pakistan. The JIT findings are based on its correspondence with Jafza.

A legal opinion from a Dubai firm verifying the legality of the employment contract will leave no room for Nawaz to contest this in court.

This result is also likely to impact the case against the Sharifs, which are being probed after the Panama Papers revealed in 2016 that three of his children owned offshore companies and assets not shown on his family's wealth statement. The assets in question include four expensive flats in Park Lane, London.

asmaalizain@khaleejtimes.com


Koi Ch Munir sey kaho- it's time to get ROI

 

[Farah Sohail]

نواز شریف کرسی سے ایسے چمٹ گیا ہے جیسے بھارت کشمیر سے چمٹا ہوا ہے ​

Dosti ka kuch tu asar hota hi hai....

Waisy acha hi hai chimta rahay..NS... Usay bhi dhakka dey kar hi niklay gi SC, jaisy India ko kashmiris ek din nikalein ge

 

[PakSword]

Aaj jo PM ke lawyer ne ye FZE wali baat accept kar hai ke PM ka iqama bhi tha aur ye company wali documents accept kar li hai.. Ye sab se damaging hai.. Ab mere khyal main advocate aur pakora judge ke liye bhi disqualification se bachaana bhtt mushkil hoga..

hmmm. I think you are right. My only worry is that Pakora and Advocate may convince Justice Aijaz ul Ahsan once again and send both matters (DQ and Criminal) to trial court/ NAB. Iss baar baaton main nahi aayen Justice Aijaz..

I think disqualification tu ab almost pakki hai.. Ab baat criminal cases ki hai.. Infact forgery ke cases ki.. Us main advocate aur pakora chahay tu bachaa saktay hain ke forgery ke cases register karnay ko na kahein.. Us issue ko ignore kar dein.. Jaisy aaj trust deed ka pakora judge ne zikr kia ke us par bhi kafi sawaalat uth gaye hain.. Sawaalat uthnay se kia matlab hai? Forensic firm ne keh diya ke woh fake aur fabricated hai.. Pakora judge keh rahay hain ke sawaalat uth gaye hain.. JIT keh rahi hai baji par criminal case banYein.. Pakora abhi tak shayad forgery ko accept nahi karrahay..bas sawaal uth gaye hain.. Bhaii..jali documents thay.sabit hochuka hai...forgery ka case banayein...

Ab jo ek favor reh gaya hai ..jo pakora aur advocate de saktay hain..woh ye ke forgery ke case ko accept na karein ...infact usay disputed fact qarar de dein..aur baji ko is par kuch na kahein...

If they don't accept forgery, Baji will get a free ticket in next elections, and TBH she may win.. Shareef Khandaan ka aik bhi banda (even Hamza) bach gaya tou party tootnay se bach jaegi.. yeh meri doosri worry hai..

Is liye main chahti thee ke kash JIT report ..Justice Khosa aur Justice Gulzar bhi review karsaktay Lekin lagta ye hai ke final verdict tu Justice Khosa hi announce karein ge..lekin woh shayad JIT report ki basis par kuch addition nahi karsaktay previous verdict main.. Lagta kuch aisa hi hai.. Afsos bhtt horaha hai mujhe iss baat ka...

You told me sometime back that Justice Wajeeh was of the view that Justice Khosa can make additions in his verdict after the JIT's report?

 

[Emmie]

Haazir Saieen @PakSword koi aur hukam Janab

That's typical Sindhi.

What is your question exactly? You as a member can't start a private conversation, you can write on users' profiles however.

 

[Moonlight]

What @Realistic Change should do, make his own profile private.. Follow me, and share the info on his own profile..

Haha yeh to indirectly keh rahe kisi or se share ka ya na mere se Zaror karo.

oo paindu I am

Being paindu is fun. :p

Ps: No problem.

 

[PakSword]

Chalo - wahan bhi khabar pohonch gai hai

http://m.khaleejtimes.com/internati...s-pakistani-pms-jafza-job-papers-as-100-legal

Koi Ch Munir sey kaho- it's time to get ROI

Yaar mujh se 2 Emirati aur aik Palestinian pooch chukay hain, ke yeh Calibri font ka kia issue hai, aur Jafza ki company main kia kaam kartay thay NS?

By the way, the letter is 100 percent legal. It didn't come from the company, it has come from JAFZA, which is a free zone authority.. JIT ne pakka kaam kia hai..

 

[VCheng]

It is quite funny and tragic, at the same time, to see this mindset of "SC is good only if it returns the verdict that one personally wants". Courts should be free from such petty thoughts if they are to do their job fairly.

 

[PakSword]

Waisy acha hi hai chimta rahay..NS... Usay bhi dhakka dey kar hi niklay gi SC, jaisy India ko kashmiris ek din nikalein ge

To be honest, mere kaam pe kafi asar parne laga hai iss case ki wajah se.. I am unable to focus on anything else.. Yesterday, missed by breakfast as well..

Maza waisay buhat aata hai daily ki "bisti" dekhnay main..

It is quite funny and tragic, at the same time, to see this mindset of "SC is good only if it returns the verdict that one personally wants". Courts should be free from such petty thoughts if they are to do their job fairly.

یار آپ فکر نہ کیا کرو زیادہ اور دماغ پر زور بھی مت ڈالا کرو.. ہم کوئی بھی سپریم کورٹ پر حملہ نہیں کرنے لگا ١٩٩٧ کی طرح .. یہ صرف نون لیگ کا ہی خاصہ ہے ​

 

[Emmie]

Heard that Dr. Dhabardhoos today was implying something fishy. What's the story? @PakSword @Farah Sohail

 

[PakSword]

Heard that Dr. Dhabardhoos today was implying something fishy. What's the story? @PakSword @Farah Sohail

I have stopped watching his programs.. unhon ne aik din JIT ke members ko bikwa dia tha.. woh bhi bharay bazar main..

Tahir ul Qadri ne tou muafi bhi mang li, inhon se shayad apnay uss ilzaam ki muafi bhi nahi maangi..

 

[Moonlight]

It is quite funny and tragic, at the same time, to see this mindset of "SC is good only if it returns the verdict that one personally wants". Courts should be free from such petty thoughts if they are to do their job fairly.

If I am not wrong you are one of the member sir who thinks Pakistan has zero justice. And see today a sitting PM is being accountable in Supreme Court along with his partners in crimes.
And now you are bringing negativity in with claiming the people of Pakistan only respect or support SC when it gives verdict against PM. A wrong thought of you.

Members here are just giving their opinions/analysis and trust me they have better understanding of the matter than so many jourons out there.

Ps: long time no see

 

[Farah Sohail]

You told me sometime back that Justice Wajeeh was of the view that Justice Khosa can make additions in his verdict after the JIT's report?

Ys.. Justice Wajihuddin was of the opinion...tht Justice Khosa and Gulzar can make some additions or even revisit their previous verdict based on JIT report.. He said this, 1-2 days before final JIT report.ie just before 10th july

But my issue..is..if Justice Khosa and Gulzar could make some additions based on JIT report..then they would have been part of this bench now....jab JIT report par arguments horahay hain dono sides se.. JO cheez inke saamnay discuss hi nahi horahi, aur dono sides ke arguments nahi horahay unke saamnay..i dont think they can judge or give verdict based on tht... Its as if..ke JIT report ko unhon ne dekhna hi nahi hai..

Lekin unka previous verdict count zuroor hoga.. Amir Mateen and Mohd Malick were in SC today.. H said Justice zijazul Ahsan used the term interim order for previous verdict..and said ke 5 member bench ke saamnay jo material diya gaya tha...aur jo ab material aaya..hai..is sab ko hum dekhein ge..woh pehle jo statements di theen..woh gum nahi hogayi hain.. S Amir Mateen and Mohd Malick said tht its clear now tht 5 member bench hi verdict announce karay ga.. S i think ..Justice zkhosa and Gulzar's verdict will be counted..Justice Khosa will announce the decision, but those two judges wont be able to make any further additions in their previous verdict..

 

[Moonlight]

Heard that Dr. Dhabardhoos today was implying something fishy. What's the story? @PakSword @Farah Sohail

You mean dr. Qaymat? You watch him? You must have a great level of sabar

I can't tolerate him.

 

[El Sidd]

You mean dr. Qaymat? You watch him? You must have a great level of sabar

I can't tolerate him.

because you are paindo