What's new

Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Kal ka program lawyers ka kharab karney ki koshish karaingey PMLN walay.. There is a large group of lawyers who support PMLN and NS. They have sabotaged the protests in the past as well. Moreover, PMLN sends gullu buts in the guise of lawyers wearing black coats.

If tomorrow's protest goes as planned and PMLN lawyers don't come out to confront the "real" lawyers, this protest will help SC a lot.. Judges feel secure when lawyers support them in large numbers. Definitely buhat farq parega..

Jii main isi group ke baat kar rahi ko against nawaz group hai
 
.
Jii main isi group ke baat kar rahi ko against nawaz group hai

Yes, but PMLN sends its goons to sabotage the protest always.. tomorrow, they will send again..

Allah karay kal aisa na karsakain tou buhat achi baat hogi..
 
.
If SC doesn't disqualify NS after this JIT report then this whole system will go up in flames. IK is right to threaten street protests to keep the pressure on these judges. DO or DIE decision in front of the judges.
 
.
Yes, but PMLN sends its goons to sabotage the protest always.. tomorrow, they will send again..

Allah karay kal aisa na karsakain tou buhat achi baat hogi..

I think nahi Karen ge pehle he model town ke wajah se mujhe lagta dua kar rahe hain ke fil hal wo case closed he rahe agar same happened tomorrow phir chaos Bhar jaye ga which won't be in favor of nawaz and company.
 
.
I was wondering that if sitting PM can be a paid employee of a foreign company, then why can't be in service COAS paid employee of other forces, likewise why can't in service CJP work for international law firms?

It should be level playing field for every key position holder in the setup or is it again selective application or rather non application of laws based on the specific surname?

Pathetic - uber pathetic sellout of entire "system" to save golden boy who never grows up to be a man enough to stop lying and cheating!
 
.
If tomorrow's protest goes as planned and PMLN lawyers don't come out to confront the "real" lawyers, this protest will help SC a lot.. Judges feel secure when lawyers support them in large numbers. Definitely buhat farq parega..
All they can do is Gullu Butt,ism expect a bigcrowd of so called lawyers with the accent of chitta anphars
 
.
Judges main himmat nazar nahi aarahi disqualify karnay ki..

InshaAllah.. Justice Ijazul Ahsan tu zuroor disqualify kar dein ge.. Aaj dosqualification ke baaray main remark bhi aaya hai..ke is baaray main faisla karna hai..ya nahi..evidence dekh kar faisla karein ge ( jo ke aa chuki hai)

Ab tu advocate bhi sharif family par bolnay lagay hain..Warna pehle tu kehtay thay ke kis SC ko ikhteyar hai ya nahi? Pehle tu advocate ne ek bhi remark sharif family ke against mahi diya tha.lbalke favor man hi boltay thay.. Mujhe advocate se bhi ziada darakora judge se lag raha hai.. Last tome hum ne advocate ko sahi judge kar liya tha ke unka decision kiya hoga? Advocate ka decision aur remarks similar hotay hain.. Ziada darr pakora judge se hai.. Unke remarks aur verdict opposite hotay hain.. Okora judge ka kuch pata nahi..abhi bhi disqualify na karein..

But i am almost sure abt Justice Ijazul Ahsan ke woh disqualify kar dein ge.. He agrees with Justice Khosa on 184/3 and 62/63.. Je just needed more information, which is now there..
 
.
Advance apologies to everyone for off topic post; can @PakSword or any other member show me how to send message to fellow members while accessing this forum from smart phone - also, this explains pathetic composition of my posts and spelling errors:) too!

Wanted to know so I can share some relevant info which can't be shared in public purview.
 
.
Advance apologies to everyone for off topic post; can @PakSword or any other member show me how to send message to fellow members while accessing this forum from smart phone - also, this explains pathetic composition of my posts and spelling errors:) too!

Wanted to know so I can share some relevant info which can't be shared in public purview.

Only TTA, mods and admins have privilege to start a private conversation.
 
.
Advance apologies to everyone for off topic post; can @PakSword or any other member show me how to send message to fellow members while accessing this forum from smart phone - also, this explains pathetic composition of my posts and spelling errors:) too!

Wanted to know so I can share some relevant info which can't be shared in public purview.

If you are using android, try to open pdf in desktop version of the browser.

Only TTA, mods and admins have privilege to start a private conversation.

I think he is asking about profile posts? @Realistic Change

@Emmie can you help him?

InshaAllah.. Justice Ijazul Ahsan tu zuroor disqualify kar dein ge.. Aaj dosqualification ke baaray main remark bhi aaya hai..ke is baaray main faisla karna hai..ya nahi..evidence dekh kar faisla karein ge ( jo ke aa chuki hai)

Ab tu advocate bhi sharif family par bolnay lagay hain..Warna pehle tu kehtay thay ke kis SC ko ikhteyar hai ya nahi? Pehle tu advocate ne ek bhi remark sharif family ke against mahi diya tha.lbalke favor man hi boltay thay.. Mujhe advocate se bhi ziada darakora judge se lag raha hai.. Last tome hum ne advocate ko sahi judge kar liya tha ke unka decision kiya hoga? Advocate ka decision aur remarks similar hotay hain.. Ziada darr pakora judge se hai.. Unke remarks aur verdict opposite hotay hain.. Okora judge ka kuch pata nahi..abhi bhi disqualify na karein..

But i am almost sure abt Justice Ijazul Ahsan ke woh disqualify kar dein ge.. He agrees with Justice Khosa on 184/3 and 62/63.. Je just needed more information, which is now there..

Allah karay aisa hi ho..
 
. .
If you are using android, try to open pdf in desktop version of the browser.



I think he is asking about profile posts? @Realistic Change

@Emmie can you help him?



Allah karay aisa hi ho..

in that case it depends on the privacy of that person who he wants to share the material with. Some people have made it public some have to only people they follow and some have completely restricted.
 
.
InshaAllah.. Justice Ijazul Ahsan tu zuroor disqualify kar dein ge.. Aaj dosqualification ke baaray main remark bhi aaya hai..ke is baaray main faisla karna hai..ya nahi..evidence dekh kar faisla karein ge ( jo ke aa chuki hai)

Ab tu advocate bhi sharif family par bolnay lagay hain..Warna pehle tu kehtay thay ke kis SC ko ikhteyar hai ya nahi? Pehle tu advocate ne ek bhi remark sharif family ke against mahi diya tha.lbalke favor man hi boltay thay.. Mujhe advocate se bhi ziada darakora judge se lag raha hai.. Last tome hum ne advocate ko sahi judge kar liya tha ke unka decision kiya hoga? Advocate ka decision aur remarks similar hotay hain.. Ziada darr pakora judge se hai.. Unke remarks aur verdict opposite hotay hain.. Okora judge ka kuch pata nahi..abhi bhi disqualify na karein..

But i am almost sure abt Justice Ijazul Ahsan ke woh disqualify kar dein ge.. He agrees with Justice Khosa on 184/3 and 62/63.. Je just needed more information, which is now there..

To be honest, aaj ke remarks mere upar se guzar gaey.. jitni grilling main expect kar raha tha utni nahi huee.

No.. I think..he is talking about private messages..

@Realistic Change you can also use option of profile posts..

And yes, dont forget me..while sharing any relevant info.. :lol:

in that case it depends on the privacy of that person who he wants to share the material with. Some people have made it public some have to only people they follow and some have completely restricted.

Yes, the receiving person should make his profile private.

But even in this case, everyone the receiver follows can see the posts.

What @Realistic Change should do, make his own profile private.. Follow me, and share the info on his own profile.. :cool:
 
.
Only TTA, mods and admins have privilege to start a private conversation.

If you are using android, try to open pdf in desktop version of the browser.



I think he is asking about profile posts? @Realistic Change

@Emmie can you help him?



Allah karay aisa hi ho..

Thanks folks- @Moonlight , @PakSword and of course @Farah Sohail - will share with you -especially if it involves any from Judiciary :)

To be honest, aaj ke remarks mere upar se guzar gaey.. jitni grilling main expect kar raha tha utni nahi huee.





Yes, the receiving person should make his profile private.

But even in this case, everyone the receiver follows can see the posts.

What @Realistic Change should do, make his own profile private.. Follow me, and share the info on his own profile.. :cool:

Haazir Saieen @PakSword koi aur hukam Janab :)

Jokers apart - I think I do follow you - but didn't notice any difference in following or not following as I don't get notifications for the posts of members that I follow or maybe too paindu I am!
 
Last edited:
.
Thanks folks- @Moonlight , @PakSword and of course @Farah Sohail - will share with you -especially if it involves any from Judiciary :)

You need to make your profile private.. then follow the individuals who you want to share the info, and then share it on your own profile.

=========================================================
نواز شریف کرسی سے ایسے چمٹ گیا ہے جیسے بھارت کشمیر سے چمٹا ہوا ہے
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom