Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion

[PakSword]

Which advocate?

 

[Farah Sohail]

Which advocate? Nisar is waiting until Monday to see which way the camel rests.

@bold You are a recent addition to this thread..thats why u dont know..

We refer to Justice Ejaz Afzal Khan as advocate and justice Sheikh Azmat Seaad as pakora, in this thread

 

[El_Swordsmen]

قدم بڑھاؤ نواز شریف ہم تمھارے ساتھ ہیں ​

RAQAM BARHAO NAWAZ SHAREEF HUM TUMHARAY SAATH HAIN !!

el_swordsmen ka isharon mai nawaz shareef ko paighaam

 

[Farah Sohail]

It WILL go to NAB but not before the PM is disqualified for being a liar. That is the only way to uphold the judges' comments about the need for justice to be seen.

I agre.. NAB main tu case jayega..but after disqualification of NS

Ek cheez samajh nahi aarahi..why is everyone expecting decision on Monday? Even PTI is saying ke next week...faisla aajayega ya monday ko hi aajayega.. Even lawyers are saying tht

Jab ke monday ko tu arguments honge..as judges said last week..ke sab log tayyari kar ke aayein...arguments ki... Tu abhi tu atleast next week tu hearing hogi... Aur uske baad decision aanay main bhi...na jaanay ke kitnay days..lagein...? Last time 2 months lagay thay.. Ab atleast 1 month tu lag hi sakta hai... Even IK has said ke next week will be last week of NS as PM.. Samajh nahi aarahi ..ke how can decision come next week..or why are they even expecting this?

 

[QatariPrince]

PMLN is crying that JIT mandate was to investigate ownership of flats.

This is what Justice Ijaz-ul-Ahsan said in his court order


"There is yet another company under the name and style of Capital FZE, Dubai presumably registered under the laws of UAE. Funds also appear to have been routed through the said company from time to time by / and on behalf of Respondent No.7. The real ownership and business of the said company is unclear from the record which needs to be explained. No effort has been made on the part of the Respondents to answer the questions on the afore-noted matters.

In our opinion, considering the high public office that Respondent No.1 holds and the requirement of honesty, transparency, clean reputation, unquestionable integrity, financial probity and accountability for a person who holds the highest elected office of the land, it was necessary and incumbent upon Respondent No.1 to place all information, documents and record before this Court to clear his own position and that of the members of his family. Very serious and damaging questions were raised and grave allegations levelled by the Petitioners and the local as well as international Print and Electronic Media regarding money laundering, tax evasion, corruption and misuse of authority on the part of Respondent No.1 and members of his family. Although lofty claims were made by and on behalf of Respondent No.1 regarding readiness and willingness to face accountability and clearing his name, the claims remained hollow rhetoric. Regrettably, no effort was made either on the part of Respondent No.1 or that of Respondents No.7 & 8 who are his sons before this Court, to come clean, to clear their names, place the true facts and relevant record before us and the people of Pakistan by producing all documentary evidence which was either in their possession, control or accessible to them which could have answered all unanswered questions, removed all doubts and put all allegations to rest and cleared their names once and for all. This was not done and an opportunity squandered for reasons best known to the Respondents. Instead refuge was taken behind vague, ambiguous, fuzzy and hyper technical pleas.

Regrettably, most material questions have remained unanswered or answered insufficiently by Respondent No.1 and his children. I am also constrained to hold that I am not satisfied with the explanation offered by
Respondent No.1 (Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif, the Prime Minister of Pakistan) and his children regarding the mode and manner in which the said properties came in their possession and what were the sources of funds utilized for acquisition of the same. Further, the source(s) of funding for Azizia Steel Mills and Hill Metals Establishment in Saudi Arabia, Flagship Investments Limited and a number of other companies set up/taken over by Respondent No.8 also need to be established. In addition to the affairs of Capital FZE, Dubai which also appears to be owned by Respondent No.7 need an inquiry. The aforesaid investigation and inquiry under normal circumstances should have been conducted by NAB. However, it has become quite obvious to us during these proceedings, Chairman NAB is too partial and partisan to be solely entrusted with such an important and sensitive investigation involving the Prime Minister of Pakistan and his family. Further owing to the nature and scope of investigation a broader pool of investigative expertise is required which may not be available with NAB."

JIT mentioned this part in its report [1 Vol-IX (Assets Beyond Means - MNS) pg # 6 point d]

#

​

I am fully expecting Justice Ijaz-ul-Ahsan to give harsh remarks against PMLN goons who are continuously saying this was not under JIT jurisdiction.

 

[PakSword]

Javed Kiyani ne tou sab ugal diya..

Bara afsos hua..

 

[Farah Sohail]

PMLN is crying that JIT mandate was to investigate ownership of flats.

This is what Justice Ijaz-ul-Ahsan said in his court order


"There is yet another company under the name and style of Capital FZE, Dubai presumably registered under the laws of UAE. Funds also appear to have been routed through the said company from time to time by / and on behalf of Respondent No.7. The real ownership and business of the said company is unclear from the record which needs to be explained. No effort has been made on the part of the Respondents to answer the questions on the afore-noted matters.

In our opinion, considering the high public office that Respondent No.1 holds and the requirement of honesty, transparency, clean reputation, unquestionable integrity, financial probity and accountability for a person who holds the highest elected office of the land, it was necessary and incumbent upon Respondent No.1 to place all information, documents and record before this Court to clear his own position and that of the members of his family. Very serious and damaging questions were raised and grave allegations levelled by the Petitioners and the local as well as international Print and Electronic Media regarding money laundering, tax evasion, corruption and misuse of authority on the part of Respondent No.1 and members of his family. Although lofty claims were made by and on behalf of Respondent No.1 regarding readiness and willingness to face accountability and clearing his name, the claims remained hollow rhetoric. Regrettably, no effort was made either on the part of Respondent No.1 or that of Respondents No.7 & 8 who are his sons before this Court, to come clean, to clear their names, place the true facts and relevant record before us and the people of Pakistan by producing all documentary evidence which was either in their possession, control or accessible to them which could have answered all unanswered questions, removed all doubts and put all allegations to rest and cleared their names once and for all. This was not done and an opportunity squandered for reasons best known to the Respondents. Instead refuge was taken behind vague, ambiguous, fuzzy and hyper technical pleas.

Regrettably, most material questions have remained unanswered or answered insufficiently by Respondent No.1 and his children. I am also constrained to hold that I am not satisfied with the explanation offered by
Respondent No.1 (Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif, the Prime Minister of Pakistan) and his children regarding the mode and manner in which the said properties came in their possession and what were the sources of funds utilized for acquisition of the same. Further, the source(s) of funding for Azizia Steel Mills and Hill Metals Establishment in Saudi Arabia, Flagship Investments Limited and a number of other companies set up/taken over by Respondent No.8 also need to be established. In addition to the affairs of Capital FZE, Dubai which also appears to be owned by Respondent No.7 need an inquiry. The aforesaid investigation and inquiry under normal circumstances should have been conducted by NAB. However, it has become quite obvious to us during these proceedings, Chairman NAB is too partial and partisan to be solely entrusted with such an important and sensitive investigation involving the Prime Minister of Pakistan and his family. Further owing to the nature and scope of investigation a broader pool of investigative expertise is required which may not be available with NAB."

JIT mentioned this part in its report [1 Vol-IX (Assets Beyond Means - MNS) pg # 6 point d]

#

​

I am fully expecting Justice Ijaz-ul-Ahsan to give harsh remarks against PMLN goons who are continuously saying this was not under JIT jurisdiction.

Pata nahi..woh harsh remarks hum kab parhein ge..of Justice Ijazul Ahsan.... Pata nahi...kitna time lagay ga decision aanay main?

Javed Kiyani ne tou sab ugal diya..

Bara afsos hua..

Pehlay Ishaq Dar, ab Javed Kiyani sahi

 

[QatariPrince]

Pata nahi..woh harsh remarks hum kab parhein ge..of Justice Ijazul Ahsan.... Pata nahi...kitna time lagay ga decision aanay main?

PMLN monday ko aur time mangay gi kay hamain aur time do parhnay key lye.

TBH 1 month say zada time nahi lagna chaye.

 

[PakSword]

Pehlay Ishaq Dar, ab Javed Kiyani sahi

Yaad hai, hum ne discuss kia tha yeh matter.. Yeh Javed Kiyani kaheen mukar na jaey.. Voice recordings ki koi legal value nahi hai..

I don't know what will happen if everyone says that "What they said in JIT, they didn't mean it"..

 

[Farah Sohail]

PMLN monday ko aur time mangay gi kay hamain aur time do parhnay key lye.

TBH 1 month say zada time nahi lagna chaye.

1 month tu hearing khatam honay ke baad...sirf decision aanay main hi lag jayega

 

[PakSword]

PMLN monday ko aur time mangay gi kay hamain aur time do parhnay key lye.

TBH 1 month say zada time nahi lagna chaye.

Mujhay 1-2 weeks ki game lag rahi hai..

Capital FZE main pakki disqualification hai.. koi defense hai hi nahi..

1 month tu hearing khatam honay ke baad...sirf decision aanay main hi lag jayega

Short order..

 

[Farah Sohail]

Yaad hai, hum ne discuss kia tha yeh matter.. Yeh Javed Kiyani kaheen mukar na jaey.. Voice recordings ki koi legal value nahi hai..

I don't know what will happen if everyone says that "What they said in JIT, they didn't mean it"..

Abhi SC....inn sab ko bulaayegi hi nahi.... Abhi tu NS hi honesty /dishonesty decide honi hai sirf... Uske baad jab accountability court main ye matter jayega..tab ye issue hoga.. Mujhe lagta hai ke us waqt bhi ye sab apni jaan bachanay ko NS par hi ilzam lagaa dein ge..aur approver ban jayein ge..like Ishaq Dar..did last time

 

[QatariPrince]

Mujhay 1-2 weeks ki game lag rahi hai..

Capital FZE main pakki disqualification hai.. koi defense hai hi nahi..

Yea bohut topi pehnatay hain. 1.5 saal say kheench rahy hain. Waisay bohut evidence hai. Kerna ho tu MOnday ko hi tiya paincha aik ho sakta hai per I think judges in ko 1 abr phir pora chance dain gay

 

[Dil Pakistan]

I agre.. NAB main tu case jayega..but after disqualification of NS

Ek cheez samajh nahi aarahi..why is everyone expecting decision on Monday? Even PTI is saying ke next week...faisla aajayega ya monday ko hi aajayega.. Even lawyers are saying tht

Jab ke monday ko tu arguments honge..as judges said last week..ke sab log tayyari kar ke aayein...arguments ki... Tu abhi tu atleast next week tu hearing hogi... Aur uske baad decision aanay main bhi...na jaanay ke kitnay days..lagein...? Last time 2 months lagay thay.. Ab atleast 1 month tu lag hi sakta hai... Even IK has said ke next week will be last week of NS as PM.. Samajh nahi aarahi ..ke how can decision come next week..or why are they even expecting this?

@BOLD - and also after the change of NAB Chairman.....

 

[Farah Sohail]

Short order..

Pata nahi..short order aata hai ya nahi? Last time bhi kaha tha ke short order nahi dein ge.. Ab bhi yehi na keh dein?