Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion

[PakSword]

haha

Hahahahahahaha...

I hate this guy Amir Liaquat. But yeh jo Pakra Gaya wala segment karta hai, buhat hilarious hota hai...

 

[Farah Sohail]

Truth about Qatari letters JIT’s biggest challenge

ISLAMABAD: As the joint investigation team (JIT) prepares to wrap up its investigation into the Sharif family’s offshore properties, it faces a big challenge of unraveling the truth about the two letters provided by a Qatari prince during the course of the Panamagate proceedings in the Supreme Court.

The letters from Prince Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber Al-Thani came confirming his business ties with the ruling Sharif family in a bid to complete the money trail to their properties in London.

But with the six-member probe team – which is to submit its final report in the Supreme Court on July 10 at the end of its 60-day tenure – still unable to record the Qatari prince’s statement, the question looms: Are the two letters a myth or reality?

A debate has already started over what legal implications will be there in case the key testimony of Prince Hamad – who insists on recording his statement at his office and not at the Pakistan mission in Doha as demanded by the JIT – is not obtained.

The Sharif family’s legal team is eyeing at taking advantage of the situation where the statement of a key witness would be missing.

A member of the team told The Express Tribune that it would be a good ground to contend before the Supreme Court that the JIT had missed out on the most important link with respect to the money trail.

A final strategy on this particular point will be devised by Khawaja Haris, a senior member of the legal team who is keenly observing the events.

It is leant that the Sharif family is very satisfied with the legal strategy devised by Haris regarding their appearance before the JIT.

Those close to the ruling family confided to The Express Tribune that the Prime Minister and his family are very confident over the last couple of days which is surprising for them as well.

The top court in its majority judgment on April 20 asked the JIT to probe “whether the sudden appearance of the letter of Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber Al-Thani is a myth or a reality”.

To fulfill this task, the JIT gave a few options to the Qatari prince for recording his statement. Despite efforts from Salman Alsam Butt, the former attorney general, and Saifur Rehman, a close aide of the Sharif family, the prince did not avail any of the options for recording his statement to prove the money trial to the Landon flats owned by the Sharif family.

The Qatari prince is reported to have shown willingness to record his statement at his palace in Doha but the JIT offered him to do so at the Pakistani embassy. However, he declined the JIT’s offer, saying that laws do not permit him to do so.

Some legal experts believe that the JIT is acting on the directives of the Supreme Court which had, on May 29, asked the JIT to disregard the Qatari prince’s letter if he did not appear in person before them. The investigating body has sent him at least two letters, requesting him to personally appear to record his statement.

Former senior law officer Shah Khawar believes that the JIT is not bound to visit Al-Thani’s residence under the law. Likewise, it was the duty of the ruling family to bring their witness before the JIT.

“If the prince does not come to verify the contents of his letters, it will be established that his communication [letters] to the top court of the country is just a myth,” Khawar opines.

However, the ruling family’s legal team that was part of the hearings in the Supreme Court believes that the family could use it to their huge advantage if the JIT is unable to record statement of his main witness.

Legal eagles think that the JIT may again seek guidance over the elusive Al-Thani testimony from the apex court which has the authority to extend the time and allow the JIT to visit at his palace in this regard.

A senior official believes that it will be interesting to see whether the court allows the Sharif family to submit their objections to the final JIT report, adding that if the court allows the respondents, then it will be a huge benefit for them. “Both the sides are smartly playing their cards,” says the official.

The five-judge larger bench of the apex court had observed in its April 20 verdict that after the receipt of the final report from the inquiry panel, the matter of the PM’s disqualification shall be considered.

“If found necessary for passing an appropriate order in this behalf, respondent No 1 [PM Nawaz] or any other person may be summoned and examined,” said the order.

It is learnt that the legal team of the Sharif family may raise objection to the implementation bench and make a request for the constitution of a larger bench for giving a final verdict in the Panamagate case. However, their legal team will evolve a final strategy after going through the final JIT report.

@PakSword @QatariPrince @Hyperion Agar Pakistan main Geo news, express aur dunya jaisay bikao media groups na hotay jo Sharif family ke mouthpieces bany huay hain.tu JIT walon ka kaam bhtt asaan hota.. Legally sharif fMily ke pass koi case nahi tha.. Ye sirf media ke through apni story propagate karrahay hain... Kash humara media itna bikao na hota

 

[PakSword]

==================================

Waisay tou iss baat se ghatia khandaan ki bisti main koi mazeed izafa nahi hoga kyun ke jitni bisti hochuki hai iss ki uss ke aagay ka koi paimana nahi ijad hua, lein phir bhi..

https://twitter.com/x/status/883605585056354305

Truth about Qatari letters JIT’s biggest challenge

ISLAMABAD: As the joint investigation team (JIT) prepares to wrap up its investigation into the Sharif family’s offshore properties, it faces a big challenge of unraveling the truth about the two letters provided by a Qatari prince during the course of the Panamagate proceedings in the Supreme Court.

The letters from Prince Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber Al-Thani came confirming his business ties with the ruling Sharif family in a bid to complete the money trail to their properties in London.

But with the six-member probe team – which is to submit its final report in the Supreme Court on July 10 at the end of its 60-day tenure – still unable to record the Qatari prince’s statement, the question looms: Are the two letters a myth or reality?

A debate has already started over what legal implications will be there in case the key testimony of Prince Hamad – who insists on recording his statement at his office and not at the Pakistan mission in Doha as demanded by the JIT – is not obtained.

The Sharif family’s legal team is eyeing at taking advantage of the situation where the statement of a key witness would be missing.

A member of the team told The Express Tribune that it would be a good ground to contend before the Supreme Court that the JIT had missed out on the most important link with respect to the money trail.

A final strategy on this particular point will be devised by Khawaja Haris, a senior member of the legal team who is keenly observing the events.

It is leant that the Sharif family is very satisfied with the legal strategy devised by Haris regarding their appearance before the JIT.

Those close to the ruling family confided to The Express Tribune that the Prime Minister and his family are very confident over the last couple of days which is surprising for them as well.

The top court in its majority judgment on April 20 asked the JIT to probe “whether the sudden appearance of the letter of Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber Al-Thani is a myth or a reality”.

To fulfill this task, the JIT gave a few options to the Qatari prince for recording his statement. Despite efforts from Salman Alsam Butt, the former attorney general, and Saifur Rehman, a close aide of the Sharif family, the prince did not avail any of the options for recording his statement to prove the money trial to the Landon flats owned by the Sharif family.

The Qatari prince is reported to have shown willingness to record his statement at his palace in Doha but the JIT offered him to do so at the Pakistani embassy. However, he declined the JIT’s offer, saying that laws do not permit him to do so.

Some legal experts believe that the JIT is acting on the directives of the Supreme Court which had, on May 29, asked the JIT to disregard the Qatari prince’s letter if he did not appear in person before them. The investigating body has sent him at least two letters, requesting him to personally appear to record his statement.

Former senior law officer Shah Khawar believes that the JIT is not bound to visit Al-Thani’s residence under the law. Likewise, it was the duty of the ruling family to bring their witness before the JIT.

“If the prince does not come to verify the contents of his letters, it will be established that his communication [letters] to the top court of the country is just a myth,” Khawar opines.

However, the ruling family’s legal team that was part of the hearings in the Supreme Court believes that the family could use it to their huge advantage if the JIT is unable to record statement of his main witness.

Legal eagles think that the JIT may again seek guidance over the elusive Al-Thani testimony from the apex court which has the authority to extend the time and allow the JIT to visit at his palace in this regard.

A senior official believes that it will be interesting to see whether the court allows the Sharif family to submit their objections to the final JIT report, adding that if the court allows the respondents, then it will be a huge benefit for them. “Both the sides are smartly playing their cards,” says the official.

The five-judge larger bench of the apex court had observed in its April 20 verdict that after the receipt of the final report from the inquiry panel, the matter of the PM’s disqualification shall be considered.

“If found necessary for passing an appropriate order in this behalf, respondent No 1 [PM Nawaz] or any other person may be summoned and examined,” said the order.

It is learnt that the legal team of the Sharif family may raise objection to the implementation bench and make a request for the constitution of a larger bench for giving a final verdict in the Panamagate case. However, their legal team will evolve a final strategy after going through the final JIT report.

@PakSword @QatariPrince @Hyperion Agar Pakistan main Geo news, express aur dunya jaisay bikao media groups na hotay jo Sharif family ke mouthpieces bany huay hain.tu JIT walon ka kaam bhtt asaan hota.. Legally sharif fMily ke pass koi case nahi tha.. Ye sirf media ke through apni story propagate karrahay hain... Kash humara media itna bikao na hota

JIT ko Qatari statement ki koi zaroorat hi nahi.. jaisa sab anchors keh rahay hain, ke itnay saboot aagaey hain JIT ke paas ke Qatari Khat ki koi ehmiat hi nahi rahegi..

Allah karay Supreme Court aik sentence HAmad Bin Jassim ke baaray main bhi shamil karay ke woh jhoota hai aur uss ne Pakistani courts se jhoot bola.. Inn arabs ki bari subki hoti hai kisi ajmi ke haathon bisti honay par.

 

[Farah Sohail]

JIT ko Qatari statement ki koi zaroorat hi nahi.. jaisa sab anchors keh rahay hain, ke itnay saboot aagaey hain JIT ke paas ke Qatari Khat ki koi ehmiat hi nahi rahegi..

Allah karay Supreme Court aik sentence HAmad Bin Jassim ke baaray main bhi shamil karay ke woh jhoota hai aur uss ne Pakistani courts se jhoot bola.. Inn arabs ki bari subki hoti hai kisi ajmi ke haathon bisti honay par.

Justice Khosa ne kiya kam bisti ki hai..qatari ki? Even Justice Ijazul Ahsan ne bhi bisti ki hai, qatri ki... Tu qatari ki bisti tu already hochuki hai, dil khol kar

Waisy ek cheez se mujhe bhi lag raha hai ke shayad JIT report ke baad hearibg ho...court order main jo likha hai..ke it (bench) may summon repondent no1 or any respondent..for purpose of disqualification of PM.. Matlab chahein tu karein..chahein tu na karein summon.... Lekin is se aisa tu lag raha hai ke JIT report ke baad bhi hearing hosakti hai? Kiya khyal hai? At dekhna ye hai ke agar hearing hui tu ye 3 member bench karay ga ya 5 member bench?

 

[PakSword]

Justice Khosa ne kiya kam bisti ki hai..qatari ki? Even Justice Ijazul Ahsan ne bhi bisti ki hai, qatri ki... Tu qatari ki bisti tu already hochuki hai, dil khol kar

Waisy ek cheez se mujhe bhi lag raha hai ke shayad JIT report ke baad hearibg ho...court order main jo likha hai..ke it (bench) may summon repondent no1 or any respondent..for purpose of disqualification of PM.. Matlab chahein tu karein..chahein tu na karein summon.... Lekin is se aisa tu lag raha hai ke JIT report ke baad bhi hearing hosakti hai? Kiya khyal hai? At dekhna ye hai ke agar hearing hui tu ye 3 member bench karay ga ya 5 member bench?

Meri tou tamanna hai ke hearing ho.. warna I will miss this thread..

On a serious note, hearing hogi shayad.. Warna tou PMLN walay itna roein gey... ke bass.

Aur jab hearing hogi tou JIT report khullay aam discuss hogi.. wah wah.. kia maza aayega.. iss thread pe ronaq dekhnay wali hogi... wohi purana January February ka time wapis aajaega..

Jitni public hearing ho, utna hi NS ka vote bank kam hota jaega.. I have heard that PMLN voters don't vote for anyone else, but they refrain from voting.. Agar yehi hojaey tou maza aajey..

 

[Farah Sohail]

Meri tou tamanna hai ke hearing ho.. warna I will miss this thread..

On a serious note, hearing hogi shayad.. Warna tou PMLN walay itna roein gey... ke bass.

Aur jab hearing hogi tou JIT report khullay aam discuss hogi.. wah wah.. kia maza aayega.. iss thread pe ronaq dekhnay wali hogi... wohi purana January February ka time wapis aajaega..

Jitni public hearing ho, utna hi NS ka vote bank kam hota jaega.. I have heard that PMLN voters don't vote for anyone else, but they refrain from voting.. Agar yehi hojaey tou maza aajey..

It is further held that upon receipt of the reports, periodic or final of the JIT, as the case may be, the matter of disqualification of respondent No. 1 shall be considered. If found necessary for passing an appropriate order in this behalf, respondent No. 1 or any other person may be summoned and examined.

Is paragraph se aap ko kiya lagta hai? Shayad hearing ho..... Warna bench kaisy summon karay ga respondents ko? Athough inhon ne kaha ke zurooro nahi hai..shayad karein ya na karein.. Lekin ye option tu tab hi available hoga..agar hearing JIT report ke baad ho?

Dekhna ye hai ke agar hearing hui tu 3 member bench ke saamnay hogi ya Justice Khosa walay bench ke saamnay? Agar Justice Khosa walay bench ke saamnay hearing hogayi..tu uffff..kia maza aayega...aah.. Soch kar hi dil khush horaha hai.. Kaash aisa hojaye tu maza hi aajaye..

 

[newb3e]

Mazza ajaye faisla miyan sanp keh favour may ajaye!

 

[Hyprion]

Truth about Qatari letters JIT’s biggest challenge

ISLAMABAD: As the joint investigation team (JIT) prepares to wrap up its investigation into the Sharif family’s offshore properties, it faces a big challenge of unraveling the truth about the two letters provided by a Qatari prince during the course of the Panamagate proceedings in the Supreme Court.

The letters from Prince Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber Al-Thani came confirming his business ties with the ruling Sharif family in a bid to complete the money trail to their properties in London.

But with the six-member probe team – which is to submit its final report in the Supreme Court on July 10 at the end of its 60-day tenure – still unable to record the Qatari prince’s statement, the question looms: Are the two letters a myth or reality?

A debate has already started over what legal implications will be there in case the key testimony of Prince Hamad – who insists on recording his statement at his office and not at the Pakistan mission in Doha as demanded by the JIT – is not obtained.

The Sharif family’s legal team is eyeing at taking advantage of the situation where the statement of a key witness would be missing.

A member of the team told The Express Tribune that it would be a good ground to contend before the Supreme Court that the JIT had missed out on the most important link with respect to the money trail.

A final strategy on this particular point will be devised by Khawaja Haris, a senior member of the legal team who is keenly observing the events.

It is leant that the Sharif family is very satisfied with the legal strategy devised by Haris regarding their appearance before the JIT.

Those close to the ruling family confided to The Express Tribune that the Prime Minister and his family are very confident over the last couple of days which is surprising for them as well.

The top court in its majority judgment on April 20 asked the JIT to probe “whether the sudden appearance of the letter of Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber Al-Thani is a myth or a reality”.

To fulfill this task, the JIT gave a few options to the Qatari prince for recording his statement. Despite efforts from Salman Alsam Butt, the former attorney general, and Saifur Rehman, a close aide of the Sharif family, the prince did not avail any of the options for recording his statement to prove the money trial to the Landon flats owned by the Sharif family.

The Qatari prince is reported to have shown willingness to record his statement at his palace in Doha but the JIT offered him to do so at the Pakistani embassy. However, he declined the JIT’s offer, saying that laws do not permit him to do so.

Some legal experts believe that the JIT is acting on the directives of the Supreme Court which had, on May 29, asked the JIT to disregard the Qatari prince’s letter if he did not appear in person before them. The investigating body has sent him at least two letters, requesting him to personally appear to record his statement.

Former senior law officer Shah Khawar believes that the JIT is not bound to visit Al-Thani’s residence under the law. Likewise, it was the duty of the ruling family to bring their witness before the JIT.

“If the prince does not come to verify the contents of his letters, it will be established that his communication [letters] to the top court of the country is just a myth,” Khawar opines.

However, the ruling family’s legal team that was part of the hearings in the Supreme Court believes that the family could use it to their huge advantage if the JIT is unable to record statement of his main witness.

Legal eagles think that the JIT may again seek guidance over the elusive Al-Thani testimony from the apex court which has the authority to extend the time and allow the JIT to visit at his palace in this regard.

A senior official believes that it will be interesting to see whether the court allows the Sharif family to submit their objections to the final JIT report, adding that if the court allows the respondents, then it will be a huge benefit for them. “Both the sides are smartly playing their cards,” says the official.

The five-judge larger bench of the apex court had observed in its April 20 verdict that after the receipt of the final report from the inquiry panel, the matter of the PM’s disqualification shall be considered.

“If found necessary for passing an appropriate order in this behalf, respondent No 1 [PM Nawaz] or any other person may be summoned and examined,” said the order.

It is learnt that the legal team of the Sharif family may raise objection to the implementation bench and make a request for the constitution of a larger bench for giving a final verdict in the Panamagate case. However, their legal team will evolve a final strategy after going through the final JIT report.

@PakSword @QatariPrince @Hyperion Agar Pakistan main Geo news, express aur dunya jaisay bikao media groups na hotay jo Sharif family ke mouthpieces bany huay hain.tu JIT walon ka kaam bhtt asaan hota.. Legally sharif fMily ke pass koi case nahi tha.. Ye sirf media ke through apni story propagate karrahay hain... Kash humara media itna bikao na hota

I think it depends on the complete & final report of JIT.
Once submitted, judges after reviewing the report will ask CJ to reinstate the same 5 judges bench to issue a verdict this time.
I am sure that the same 5 judges bench will be reinstated, they may summon anyone if needed.
NS and family has no other option and the will use qatri card again but that will not hold as SC has already told JIT to dump it if he does not appear before JIT in Pakistan or in the Embassy of Pakistan.
As another member here pointed to the fact that JIT can only operate in the jurisdiction of SC which is the territory of Pakistan.

I only hope that this goes back to the old bench and that this time they decide agaist NS and family unanimously.

 

[Farah Sohail]

@PakSword @Hyperion

Monday se jo week shuru horaha hai..10th july se...14th tak.. Is main final JIT report ke baad agar hearing honi bhi hui....tu is week main nahi hosakti... 10th july ko JIT report ke baad..11th july se pakora judge aur Justice Ijazul Ahsan lahore chalay jayein ge aur 11th se 14th tak lahore main hi cases sunein ge.

Strangely 10th july walay week main Justice Khosa ke bench ke aagay koi case nahi hai... Na Islamabad, na lahore na karachi, na pehsawar, quetta.. Kahin bhi innka koi case nahi hai. Justice khosa pooray week free hi honge...abhi tak tu SC wesbite yehi bataa rahi hai.......along with Justice Khosa, Justice Qazi Faiz Isa, Justice Dost Mohammad Khan, aur Justice Tariq Masood..in sab ka next week koi case nahi hai..

Tu agar JIT report ke baad...panama case ki koi hearing hui bhi.ltu 17th july walay week se pehle nahi hosakti

 

[PakSword]

It is further held that upon receipt of the reports, periodic or final of the JIT, as the case may be, the matter of disqualification of respondent No. 1 shall be considered. If found necessary for passing an appropriate order in this behalf, respondent No. 1 or any other person may be summoned and examined.

Is paragraph se aap ko kiya lagta hai? Shayad hearing ho..... Warna bench kaisy summon karay ga respondents ko? Athough inhon ne kaha ke zurooro nahi hai..shayad karein ya na karein.. Lekin ye option tu tab hi available hoga..agar hearing JIT report ke baad ho?

Dekhna ye hai ke agar hearing hui tu 3 member bench ke saamnay hogi ya Justice Khosa walay bench ke saamnay? Agar Justice Khosa walay bench ke saamnay hearing hogayi..tu uffff..kia maza aayega...aah.. Soch kar hi dil khush horaha hai.. Kaash aisa hojaye tu maza hi aajaye..

"may be" means SC may summon, may not summon. This is what I have understood.

Mazza ajaye faisla miyan sanp keh favour may ajaye!

Woh bhi mazedar scene hoga.. iss thread pe kisi bhi faislay ke baad ronaq lagegi.. All Mian saanp sanpolias are invited to join us on that blessed occasion.

 

[Farah Sohail]

"may be" means SC may summon, may not summon. This is what I have understood.

Ye baat tu theek hai, aap ki.. Tht its their choice whther to summon or not.. Zuroori nahi hai, summon karna..

But what i meant was..ke ye option summon karnay ka..tu tab hi hoga na..if theres any hearing after JIT report? Agar JIT report ke baad koi hearing hi na ho...tu yeh option (although not necessary..to summon PM, or anyone else) tu hoga hi nahi.....?

 

[QatariPrince]

لاہور:جےآئی ٹی متنازع ہوچکی ہے،مولانافضل الرحمان​

 

[Farah Sohail]

Woh bhi mazedar scene hoga.. iss thread pe kisi bhi faislay ke baad ronaq lagegi.. All Mian saanp sanpolias are invited to join us on that blessed occasion.

Allah na kary ke Mian Sanp ke haqq main faisla aaye.. Waisy ye tu aap ne theek kaha ke faislay ke baad bhtt ronaq lagay gi..... Waisy mera khyal hai ke ab 3 judges Mian sanp ke favor main faisla de bhi nahi saktay... Justice Khosa aur Gulzar ke verdict ki wajah se..ab inn par bhtt pressure hai.. Esp Justice zkhosa ne jitna harsh verdict likha hai....uske baad aur JIT ki report ke baad bhi agar 3 judges ne Mian sanp ke haqq main faisla de diya... Tu ye public main bhtt ziada badnaam hojayein ge.. Inhein kahin chupnay ki jagah nahi milay gi.. Aur agar JIT ki report public hogayi...uske baad tu ye 3 judges kahin nahi chup sakein ge.. Abhi tu JIT ki report ka sahara le liya tha pehlay..aur 2 months sab ne wait kar liya.. Lekin is arsay main sharif family ka jo conduct raha hai..judges, JIT ko dhamkaana..is sab ke baad bhi agar ye judges PM ke favor main faisla dein ge tu inki apni credibility bilkol zero hojayegi... Justice Khosa aur Gulzar ki wajah se..in par pehle hi bhtt pressure hai

Justice Ijazul Ahsan tu..am almost sure ke woh disqualify kar hi dein ge.. So not much worried

Waisy jaisy pehle hum ne 2 months..ek ek din guzar kar intezar kiya tha.. Ab phir wohi din wapis aajayein..jab ek ek din gin kar intezar kartay thay

Waisy is sab ke baad bhi 1 month se pehle tu panama case ka final faisla nahi aayega.. SC ek nornal case main bhi 1-2 months le letay hain.. Lahore high court main sugar mills walay case ka abhi tak faisla nahi aaya.. 1 month se upar hochuka hai.. So, 2 months is almost a routine in our courts.. Us ke baad hi faisla aata hai.. Hnm samajh rahay thay ke pehlay panama case ka faisla jo 2 months baad aaya..ye bhtt delay hua.. Lekin aisa nahi.. Ye tu shayad routine hai... Ab bhi lagta hai ke minimum...1 month intezar karna hi paray ga final verdict ke liye

 

[Hyprion]

@PakSword @Hyperion

Monday se jo week shuru horaha hai..10th july se...14th tak.. Is main final JIT report ke baad agar hearing honi bhi hui....tu is week main nahi hosakti... 10th july ko JIT report ke baad..11th july se pakora judge aur Justice Ijazul Ahsan lahore chalay jayein ge aur 11th se 14th tak lahore main hi cases sunein ge.

Strangely 10th july walay week main Justice Khosa ke bench ke aagay koi case nahi hai... Na Islamabad, na lahore na karachi, na pehsawar, quetta.. Kahin bhi innka koi case nahi hai. Justice khosa pooray week free hi honge...abhi tak tu SC wesbite yehi bataa rahi hai.......along with Justice Khosa, Justice Qazi Faiz Isa, Justice Dost Mohammad Khan, aur Justice Tariq Masood..in sab ka next week koi case nahi hai..

Tu agar JIT report ke baad...panama case ki koi hearing hui bhi.ltu 17th july walay week se pehle nahi hosakti

is se to waqai lagta h k shayad agly week hearing na ho. esa bhi ho skta h k is bench ko ye week chahiay ho JIT ki report ka jaiza leny k liay to isi liay esa plane kia gya ho.

لاہور:جےآئی ٹی متنازع ہوچکی ہے،مولانافضل الرحمان​

Moulana Sahab khud kitny mutanazy hn ye bhi bata detay.

Allah na kary ke Mian Sanp ke haqq main faisla aaye.. Waisy ye tu aap ne theek kaha ke faislay ke baad bhtt ronaq lagay gi..... Waisy mera khyal hai ke ab 3 judges Mian sanp ke favor main faisla de bhi nahi saktay... Justice Khosa aur Gulzar ke verdict ki wajah se..ab inn par bhtt pressure hai.. Esp Justice zkhosa ne jitna harsh verdict likha hai....uske baad aur JIT ki report ke baad bhi agar 3 judges ne Mian sanp ke haqq main faisla de diya... Tu ye public main bhtt ziada badnaam hojayein ge.. Inhein kahin chupnay ki jagah nahi milay gi.. Aur agar JIT ki report public hogayi...uske baad tu ye 3 judges kahin nahi chup sakein ge.. Abhi tu JIT ki report ka sahara le liya tha pehlay..aur 2 months sab ne wait kar liya.. Lekin is arsay main sharif family ka jo conduct raha hai..judges, JIT ko dhamkaana..is sab ke baad bhi agar ye judges PM ke favor main faisla dein ge tu inki apni credibility bilkol zero hojayegi... Justice Khosa aur Gulzar ki wajah se..in par pehle hi bhtt pressure hai

Justice Ijazul Ahsan tu..am almost sure ke woh disqualify kar hi dein ge.. So not much worried

Waisy jaisy pehle hum ne 2 months..ek ek din guzar kar intezar kiya tha.. Ab phir wohi din wapis aajayein..jab ek ek din gun kar intezar kartay thay

Waisy is sab ke baad bhi 1 month se pehle tu panama case ka final faisla nahi aayega.. SC ek nornal case main bhi 1-2 months le letay hain.. Lahore high court main sugar mills walay case ka abhi tak faisla nahi aaya.. 1 month se upar hochuka hai.. So, 2 months is almost a routine in our courts.. Us ke baad hi faisla aata hai.. Hnm samajh rahay thay ke pehlay panama case ka faisla jo 2 months baad aaya..ye bhtt delay hua.. Lekin aisa nahi.. Ye tu shayad routine hai... Ab bhi lagta hai ke minimum...1 month intezar karna hi paray ga final verdict ke liye

Agr CJ ne aik aur naya bench bna dia pehly 2 judges ki gher mojoodgi m to phir kia hoga ?
lagta to nahi k esa karen gy CJ kion k is se to ye lagy ga k un judges ko jinhon ne NS k khilaf faisla dia tha, unko sideline kia gya h or log yehi smjhen gy k is dafa koi judicial NRO ho raha h.
Meri to ye dua h k case wapis pehly bench k pass hi jay or faisla unanimous ho against NS or pori family ko na sirf na ehl kia jay balky inke khilaf references bhi bhejy jain.

Ajkal Punjab me to bandar bant shoro ho chuki h development funds ki.
PPP ne ap sb ko yaad ho ga akhri din sundy ko bhi banks khulway thy aur aik din m billions k development funds release kiay thy.

 

[newb3e]

لاہور:جےآئی ٹی متنازع ہوچکی ہے،مولانافضل الرحمان​

Is mulanay keh pait may jo hai woh bhi matanaza hai!

is se to waqai lagta h k shayad agly week hearing na ho. esa bhi ho skta h k is bench ko ye week chahiay ho JIT ki report ka jaiza leny k liay to isi liay esa plane kia gya ho.



Moulana Sahab khud kitny mutanazy hn ye bhi bata detay.



Agr CJ ne aik aur naya bench bna dia pehly 2 judges ki gher mojoodgi m to phir kia hoga ?
lagta to nahi k esa karen gy CJ kion k is se to ye lagy ga k un judges ko jinhon ne NS k khilaf faisla dia tha, unko sideline kia gya h or log yehi smjhen gy k is dafa koi judicial NRO ho raha h.
Meri to ye dua h k case wapis pehly bench k pass hi jay or faisla unanimous ho against NS or pori family ko na sirf na ehl kia jay balky inke khilaf references bhi bhejy jain.

Ajkal Punjab me to bandar bant shoro ho chuki h development funds ki.
PPP ne ap sb ko yaad ho ga akhri din sundy ko bhi banks khulway thy aur aik din m billions k development funds release kiay thy.

Miyan sanp toh insha Allah zaleel hoga is manhoos zardari aur is keh haram khor tollay ko kab phansi lagay ge?