Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion

[PakSword]

flimsy case

It might be a flimsy case to you, but to many of us, in a country where people die on cold floors of the hospitals because of the unavailability of beds, corruption of billions is indeed a serious case...

 

[Dastaan]

Name of Alternate PM is Ch.Nisar

I think khurram dastgir.he is another mamnoon husain in nawaz league.

@friendly_troll96 @The Eagle @Panther 57 @syed1

یہ تو ہر طرف سے تابڑ توڑحملے والی بات ہوگئی- اگر نواز شریف پانامہ سے بچ نکلنے میں کامیاب ہوجاتا ہے، تو اسکا مطلب اس کے ساتھ سپریم کورٹ کے ساتھ ساتھ غیبی امداد بھی ہے- یا پھر الله ہمارے گناہوں کی سزا نواز شریف کی صورت میں دے رہا ہے- جب تک قوم اجتماعی توبہ نہیں کریگی، مسئلہ حل نہیں ہوگا-

ویسے عمران خان نے اپنے کرکٹ کیریئر میں بھی اتنی باؤنسرز نہیں ماری ہونگی جتنی اس ایک کیس میں ماردی ہیں- یہ کیس اگر عمران خان ہارتا ہے تو اس کا پولیٹیکل کیریئر اختتام پذیر ہوجاۓگا ​

I don't know about IK career is finished or not but I'm 100% sure he destroyed political career of maryam bibi before it started.

 

[PakSword]

Entertainment time... @Farah Sohail @Doordie

Some one posted lion's pic after posting headlines of different newspapers on another forum siasat.pk

Now look at the condition of Mariam's sherrrrrr....

Someone has posted this pic Quaid e Azam's payment receipt...

 

[Dawood Ibrahim]

Entertainment time... @Farah Sohail @Doordie

Some one posted lion's pic after posting headlines of different newspapers on another forum siasat.pk

View attachment 366784


Now look at the condition of Mariam's sherrrrrr....

View attachment 366785


Someone has posted this pic Quaid e Azam's payment receipt...

View attachment 366786

You mean the below where IK is scaring the darling of PMLN

 

[Dawood Ibrahim]

PTI to hold rally in Bhawalpur today
By Web Desk
Posted on January 8, 2017

BHAWALPUR: The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) will hold a public gathering in Bhawalpur on Sunday, ARY News reported.

All preparations have been made for the public gathering at During Hall and many supporters have already started arriving in large groups from across the province.

The rally will be addressed by chairman Imran Khan and other senior party leadership. A large stage measuring around hundred foot long has been set, while security arrangement have been tightened around the venue.

READ MORE: Imran Khan thinks SC has sufficient convincing evidence on Panamagate Case
It is pertinent to note that the high-profile ‘Panamagate’ case currently being heard in the Supreme Court against Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and his children.

A five-member bench of the apex court headed by Justice Asif Saeed Khosa and Justice Azmat Saeed, Justice Ijaz Afzal, Justice Gulzar Ahmed and Justice Ijaz-ul-Hasan as its members is hearing the case on a regular basis.

The PTI has maintained that it has provided enough evidence to prove that the children of the premier owned off-shore companies and properties abroad.

ALSO READ: Panamagate Case: PM Nawaz submits response to questions posed by SC
Imran Khan said Wednesday that the court has refrained him from openly discussing the case in the media as it is under investigation, and has full confidence in the bench.

Spokesman PTI Fawad Chaudhry said on Saturday that their counsel Naeem Bukhari is expected to conclude his arguments by Tuesday, and now the onus remains on the prime minister to absolve himself.


http://arynews.tv/en/pti-to-hold-rally-in-bhawalpur-today/

@war&peace @PakSword @Farah Sohail @Verve @epicname @Emmie @The Eagle

 

[war&peace]

Entertainment time... @Farah Sohail @Doordie

Some one posted lion's pic after posting headlines of different newspapers on another forum siasat.pk

View attachment 366784


Now look at the condition of Mariam's sherrrrrr....

View attachment 366785


Someone has posted this pic Quaid e Azam's payment receipt...

View attachment 366786

Well that's an interesting development

 

[Dawood Ibrahim]

Well that's an interesting development

I know for sure IK will mention KUWAITI DIESEL ( Fazal Rahman ) coz he was phone by the PM

 

[The Eagle]

@friendly_troll96 @The Eagle @Panther 57 @syed1

یہ تو ہر طرف سے تابڑ توڑحملے والی بات ہوگئی- اگر نواز شریف پانامہ سے بچ نکلنے میں کامیاب ہوجاتا ہے، تو اسکا مطلب اس کے ساتھ سپریم کورٹ کے ساتھ ساتھ غیبی امداد بھی ہے- یا پھر الله ہمارے گناہوں کی سزا نواز شریف کی صورت میں دے رہا ہے- جب تک قوم اجتماعی توبہ نہیں کریگی، مسئلہ حل نہیں ہوگا-

ویسے عمران خان نے اپنے کرکٹ کیریئر میں بھی اتنی باؤنسرز نہیں ماری ہونگی جتنی اس ایک کیس میں ماردی ہیں- یہ کیس اگر عمران خان ہارتا ہے تو اس کا پولیٹیکل کیریئر اختتام پذیر ہوجاۓگا ​

TBH, secondly it seems like that even the Nation wants to maintain status quo and is confused with up-coming change. However, we also have a history as being played fool in the name of change etc so an easy solution for confusion and mistrust is, one must seek change, be aware rather than guided by others and to avoid personal liking/individual benefit against family/linguistic politics. People accompanying IK are internal threats to PTI success and causing the damage as being used shells/dead ammunition. ik is also being played on an agenda by hands of such people that even marrying Reham was a setup. The list goes long though may IK realise someday that has to get rid of these political vampires that have no credibility in politics and used PTI platform for the fame.

A bit of wrongly selected team actually halted the growth process of party otherwise, looking at start, PTI had the potential to outclass them all but very few understands the great game of politics that sometimes, opponents deliberately let you catch one of their best to have someone in there.... See Hashmi chapter.... Look at Qureshi..... Look at PTI team from Karachi that has no credibility but IK face value alone that runs the party. PTI Karachi chapter with slow progress rate or I may almost halted, has another aspect as well that I observed while listening/talking to either ex-PTI supporters or the people that wants to support PTI at large but due to same issue, are stepping back for the while but I wouldn't comment at the moment.

These are few of the reasons that prolonged the change process and to have desired results beside time taking growth. These are my observations alone that I see as unfortunate for PTI success.

 

[Farah Sohail]

رقم بڑھاؤ نواز شریف ہم تمھارے ساتھ ہیں

٣ بک گئے، ٢ کے ساتھ مزاکرات جاری ہیں- میرے خیال میں گورنر کی آفر سے کم پر نہیں مانیں گے
​

Anyway, those who wanted to know the detail of what happened in the court, below is the best summary I could find...

@Emmie @Farah Sohail @El_Swordsmen @Doordie @IceCold @Verve @epicname @biloo700 @war&peace @friendly_troll96 @The Eagle @Panther 57 @Syed1.

​

Burden of proof becomes sticking point in Panama case

ISLAMABAD: Members of the Supreme Court bench hearing the Panamagate case on Friday expressed divergent opinions over which side shouldered the burden of proof. While Justice Asif Saeed Khosa — who heads the five-judge bench — wanted the onus to prove innocence to rest on Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s family, two other members of the bench differed.

During the hearing of Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf and Jamaat-i-Islami petitions seeking the disqualification of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, Justice Khosa effectively came to the PTI’s rescue when he referred to the 2006 trust deed, declaring Maryam Nawaz Safdar the trustee of her brother Hussain Nawaz, and observed that the onus to prove innocence had shifted to the respondents, i.e. the prime minister’s family.

The observation came when PTI counsel Naeem Bokhari cited a number of communications, such as the June 12, 2012 letter from the British Virgin Islands’ Financial Investigation Agency (FIA) to Mossack Fonseca Money Laundering Reporting Officer J. Nizbeth Maduro, raising queries about Nescoll Limited and Nielson Enterprises Limited — the companies that owned the four London flats.

Justice Khosa says Sharifs should prove their innocence; Justice Azmat and Justice Ejaz want PTI to furnish more evidence
The counsel also referred to Mossack Fonseca’s June 2012 response, acknowledging that Nielson and Nescoll were owned by the same beneficial owner, Maryam, and that family’s business spread over 60 years was the source of her wealth. The counsel also provided acknowledgement of the Samba Financial Group, Jeddah, certifying that Maryam was one of their valued customers since 2002, while highlighting that Maryam did not have the resources to buy the London flats.

She allegedly acted as a tool to launder money for her father, of whom she was a dependant, and received gifts from father and brother, he argued.

Also read: Supreme Court focus remains on Maryam Nawaz's expenditures

So many questions needed to be answered since a strong connection between Maryam Nawaz, Samba Group and Minerva Financial Services Ltd had emerged, Justice Khosa observed, wondering whether the court should utilise the services of forensic investigators to match Maryam Nawaz’s signatures in the trust deed and other documents.

But Justice Sheikh Azmat Saeed dissented, observing that the real issues that needed attention were the questions: whether the trust deed was an admitted, valid and effective document; whether the two children were obliged to disclose the deed under UK laws; and under what capacity Maryam was declared the trustee or the owner of these companies.

It is for you (the petitioner) to tell the court what are the principles of benami, the judge said, pointing towards Mr Bokhari, asking whether he wanted the court to lay down a judgement that all gifts such the ones received by Maryam from her father and brother at different points of time were benami.

“Do not burden us to look at the law,” the judge observed, adding that they still were at “square one”.

But Justice Khosa referred to Article 122 of the Qanoon-e-Shahadat 1984, which suggests that the burden of proving a fact rested upon the person who had the knowledge of that fact, adding that it was always difficult to acquire documents regarding offshore investments.

The judge then cited Article 161 of the same law to emphasise that the law vested powers on any judge to pose questions or order the production of any documents to discuss proper proof.

It is for the defendants to produce documents to show how they acquired these offshore companies, as well as the money trail to buy the four London flats, Justice Khosa reiterated.

“Are we recording evidence?”, was the observation from Justice Saeed. “Why not then frame charges?” Justice Khosa observed.

“If we start recording evidence, then you will boycott [these proceedings],” Justice Saeed observed in a lighter vein, pointing towards Naeem Bokhari.

“Is it too much to ask for documents?” was Justice Khosa’s retort.

Justice Azmat also regretted that the defendants had not filed the required documents, adding that in order to refute the evidence filed by the petitioner, they would have to bring documents to support their claims.

Justice Azmat Saeed intervened, saying that the matter would end if the defendants put the relevant documents, explaining how Mariam became the beneficial owner of the London flats, on the court’s record.

At this point, another member of the bench, Justice Ejaz Afzal Khan, referred to Article 13 of the Constitution, which provides protection to the accused from bringing any witness or evidence against himself, adding that the Supreme Court was neither a trial court, nor was it seized with a civil case or inquiry at the moment.

“You (the petitioner) have to satisfy us about the authenticity of the documents you have presented before the court,” Justice Khan observed, adding that at this stage, it was too early to consider these documents.

Justice Saeed also reminded the PTI counsel “not go to this territory” since the communications he was referring to were “not sent or received by you” and the documents were “mere photocopies”.

“You [cannot only] rely on the Qanoon-e-Shahadat and throw away the rest of the law and the Constitution,” he said.

“We are trying to find out the truth,” Justice Khosa then intervened, citing the relevant Supreme Court rules. He emphasised that the court enjoyed ample authority to order the production of any evidence necessary.

“Perhaps the stage when the party is required to produce the evidence has not come,” Justice Khan observed, adding that they would have recourse under Article 161 of the Qanoon-e-Shahadat.

“Place all your cards on the table, so that we can look at them,” was Justice Khan’s observation.

Justice Ijazul Ahsan also observed that the petitioner had not provided any document to prove ownership of the flats prior to 2006. But Mr Bokhari kept repeating that it was for the defendants to provide these.

On Friday, PTI also submitted the transcript of an interview of Haroon Pasha – the Sharif’s financial adviser – where he had claimed that all the records and documents about financial transactions had been provided to their lawyer.

Meanwhile, Advocate Shahid Hamid — representing Maryam, Finance Minister Ishaq Dar and Capt Safdar — told Dawn that he may on Monday submit a supplementary reply on behalf of Mariam to rebut the allegations that surfaced during the course of the hearing.

Published in Dawn, January 7th, 2017

So it seems tht only Justice Khosa is the serious one in this bench..while pakora judge,( Justice Azmat Saeed) as I earlier stated is merely acting as defense lawyer of Sharif family and Justice Ejaz ul hasan too

 

[Village life]

kuti choraan NAL mili hoi hay ,kuch Nai hoga ,don't waste your precious time and bandwidth on our beloved holly institutions, what we needed was a fu,**k of to this Constitution and a new one which can only be done buy intervention of army and they all ready have said "we are bigger political party than the rest" because after the corp's commander meeting of 16 Oct 2016 their statement seems to me as political as that of NS in national Assembly,

 

[biloo700]

Tweets me bhee Tazaad

 

[El_Swordsmen]

Tweets me bhee Tazaad View attachment 366933

Maryam Bibi's frustration is evident

 

[Dawood Ibrahim]

Sheikh Rasheed predicts Panama case

By:
NNI




08-Jan-17



LAHORE: Awami Muslim League (AML) Chief Sheikh Rasheed on Sunday said that they will once again stage a protest if necessary.

Speaking with the media at the airport, Sheikh Rasheed said that judiciary is like the ‘Wall of China’ in front of corruption.

He claimed that the opposition would have formed a ‘grand alliance’, if Zardari had not overpowered Bilawal and took the charge himself. The AML chief predicted that Panama case result will be declared in January.

Besides lambasting the government, Sheikh Rasheed also criticised Ayaz Sadiq and said that no assembly can run and work properly while having a speaker like him.


http://dailytimes.com.pk/pakistan/08-Jan-17/zardari-came-between-grand-opposition-alliance


@war&peace @PakSword @tps77 @SherDil007 @El_Swordsmen @Farah Sohail

 

[AUz]

Just a food for thought

Imagine if Bill Gates or Steve Jobs found themselves in similar case. How long would the case take?

Maximum, two sessions. That's it. Because when you have halal ki kamayi--even if it's billions of dollars--it's not hard to show evidence of your sources, your wealth records, and get yourself cleared from court.


But it is taking MONTHS for shareef family and they are going up and down. Sometimes its Qatari prince, sometimes it's business in Dubai, sometimes it's loan money..and circle keeps revolving and details keep getting more confusing..

Now tell me with straight face that shareef hasn't done any financial corruption and have never misused their governmental powers

@SBD-3

 

[war&peace]

It might be a flimsy case to you, but to many of us, in a country where people die on cold floors of the hospitals because of the unavailability of beds, corruption of billions is indeed a serious case...

Never give any weight to a patwari's opinion.