PakSword
MODERATOR
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2015
- Messages
- 19,505
- Reaction score
- 103
- Country
- Location
If we are to agree then PMLN would be right on their stance on GodFather part in the Order.
Judges said it right. Limits had been breached and enough was said by PMLN lot. Since it is a fight with judiciary, the judges have made it very clear today that they will put up with no more. And they used the mafia reference from the Order, again rightly so - government is acting like mafia.
Sir,
Mein verdict main inn ki aisee taisee karnay pe yaqeen rakhta hun.. Remarks kuchh nahi kartay siwaey muamlay ko controversial banatay hain. .
Aap ne dekha tha, ke Justice Khosa kafi napay tulay remarks detay thay.. lekin verdict main unhon ne NS aur poori family ki aisi bajai.. ke yeh zindagi bhar yaad rakhain gey..
Sh. Azmat uss waqt bhi remarks main aisa kartay thay, lekin verdict main thuss hogaey..
In the last 48-hours the "kettle" has reached boiling point.
PMLn will try and create more controversies in the coming weeks.
They know that, unless they do it, their game is over.
So far PMLn has moved forward few pawns as sacrificial lambs, but they have been taken out (this includes Pervez Raheed, Tariq Fatimi, Rao Tehseen - and most recently Nihal Hashmi).
The knights (Saad Rafique and Maryam Aurangzeb) and bishops (Ahsan Iqbal) attack from the corners but remain careful that they don't get caught.
NS has managed to save the queen (Maryam Nawaz) so far. In dawn leaks there was a direct attempt to take out queen but NS managed to defend at that time.
This is the best comment so far.. Piyaday (pawn) ke liey Malka (Queen) dao par nahi lagai jaati.. Yehi mera khayal hai, jab main kehta hun ke Panama bench ke judges ko Nihal Hashmi wala case sunna hi nahi chahiey tha.. aur agar sunn lia hai tou remarks nahi dene chahiey thay.. agar Nihal ko jail bhijwadetey, ya ATC refer kardetay, aur yeh bhi keh detey ke hum ne baqi logon ki statements bhi note kar li hain, aur ainda bhi karaingay, aur appropriate time par unn se bhi nimtaingay tou PMLN ke ghubbaray se hawa nikal jati..
We have to understand, PMLN asked Nihal Hashmi to give those threats, they were almost certain ke at least one of the judge will pass such remarks that will give them a chance to make the whole Panama case controversial. aur aisa hi hua..
Judges bhi remarks de kar beth gaey.. Nihal Hashmi ko tou iss waqt tak indict kar ke ATC refer kar dena chahiey tha.. yeh kia baat huee ke apna jawab dakhil karain.. I mean hadd hoti hai..
threats were given to the JIT & the 3 member bench that formed it .... who else was supposed to listen the case ??why is he giving lecture on right & wrong ... he should stick to his job, reporting !!
He is right boss.. Umar Cheema is the only journalist from Pakistan who was involved with ICIJ team. Sometimes, his comments are just rubbish, but this time around, he was right.. Nihal Hashmi hasn't taken any name. He referred to JIT and Judiciary as a whole in his remarks.. There are other cases being heard in other courts against shareefs as well..
So CJ should have heard it himself, or constituted a different "larger" bench..
When Nihal was coming out, there was a certain smile on his face like he was saying "I have done my job effectively, now I will be rewarded by the mafia head".