Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion

[Panther 57]

There will be daily hearings until result.

yes and the result would be that there is not conclusive evidence hence case dismissed or formation of commission.

 

[Farah Sohail]

There is no muk muka. all parties except JI want court to decide.

PML N also wants commission

 

[Mansoon]

PML N also wants commission

No, they don't.

 

[Farah Sohail]

yes and the result would be that there is not conclusive evidence hence case dismissed or formation of commission.

I also this from the begining..lekin phir bhi pata nahi...why i started to have some hope from yesterday? My fault..... If commission is made, then..... Ufffffff....

 

[Mansoon]

yes and the result would be that there is not conclusive evidence hence case dismissed or formation of commission.

There is no conclusive evidence that Nawaz Sharif has failed to provide money trail? That he has lied on parliament floor?

I also this from the begining..lekin phir bhi pata nahi...why i started to have some hope from yesterday? My fault..... If commission is made, then..... Ufffffff....

Commission will not be made. It will drag the case.

 

[Panther 57]

PML N also wants commission

Shiekh Rasheed Said and I quote
"ٹرک کی بتی کے پیچہے لگا دیا"

 

[Farah Sohail]

No, they don't.

PakSword has shared screenshot of Salman but, what he said...see tht

 

[Mansoon]

https://twitter.com/x/status/806397293616308224

 

[war&peace]

Uffffffff

Don't start uffing and puffing so soon buddy..Comission will not be formed. It will be decided by the court as prosecutors are not willing for a commission.

 

[PakSword]

Guys, whatever we say, but commission is required because of the following reasons:

PTI provided unattested documents.
PMLN said that banks don't keep record of more than 5 years.
Court said that it wants to ascertain whether the money was remitted from Pakistan.

If PTI says no, their documents' value will be the same as the Qatari letter in front of the bench.

 

[Panther 57]

There is no conclusive evidence that Nawaz Sharif has failed to provide money trail? That he has lied on parliament floor?

In legal language
I fully agree to your contention. But judges may not hold this and it will just remain a contention

 

[Mansoon]

https://twitter.com/x/status/806401164023623680

In legal language
I fully agree to your contention. But judges may not hold this and it will just remain a contention

Failure to provide evidence means PM cannot defend himself and hence is guilty.

 

[El_Swordsmen]

I agree... Even i was skeptical about this case from the begining... Pata nahi, kal se kiun umeed lagaa kar beth gayi thee? but if commission is made, then good bye to the case....

NO, Judges said if both parties does not agree on the formation of commission thn we will give verdict according to submitted docs in SC. Chief Justice also said that they will not give months date to commission for investigation which is good thing !!

 

[Farah Sohail]

Guys, whatever we say, but commission is required because of the following reasons:

PTI provided unattested documents.
PMLN said that banks don't keep record of more than 5 years.
Court said that it wants to ascertain whether the money was remitted from Pakistan.

If PTI says no, their documents' value will be the same as the Qatari letter in front of the bench.

Ok...then good bye, to the case..because it will drag on and on.... Cant courts see for themselves, tht PM has lied? Forget documents... Sarif family has owned those apartments, and has not prorvided any money trail...now..isnt it enough proof?

 

[Mansoon]

https://twitter.com/x/status/806401036315463680

https://twitter.com/x/status/806402213551673344

https://twitter.com/x/status/806402011528884225