Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And that's another issue. He has brought a money trail that will prove he's truthful and his children are liars, like I said. So to prove him a liar, is to prove he's corrupt. This is why the case is one and the same, you need to prove his corruption, let's hope there is proof we haven't seenTo give NS clean chit court has to accept those Qatri letters .If court accept it then corruption is legal is pak everyone will bring those letter s and get rid of his loot money
Everyone lies.
It's still about corruption
So to prove his lies, you need to prove his corruption and disqualify him on both.
I think u not follwing what i am saying or u dont wana listen .we all lie its true but when u give speech in parliment as PM about ur family and wealth as a written draft its a statement of PM .Then in court u said something different that what this case is about .In paliment u said its Dubai jeddah london in court u saying Qatar london this is case its not about corruption yet that would be next step after this verdict .Again, most lies are not his. Some are. Everyone lies. Does he lie more than others? It's still about corruption because that's what his lies are about. So to prove his lies, you need to prove his corruption and disqualify him on both.
I am hoping for his disqualification under article 62/63...not on money laundering charges
Because he lied about his money, man. If he lied about his money, it's obvious he lied because of corruption.PM shouldn't lie.
No, it is about Sadiq and Ameen. Corruption will come later when the case will be transferred to trial court for recording of evidences.
What? to prove his lies, petitioner needs to prove his corruption? wow!
may I dare to ask the grounds for that??
Because he lied about his money, man. If he lied about his money, it's obvious he lied because of corruption.
Anyway, we'll get judgement soon, no point of speculating. Hopefully, he's guilty, but I don't have high hopes of it from what I've heard.
Yes, but the issue is that he lied about his money because of corruption. If that is true, he's obviously not Sadiq or Ameen. If it isn't true, then there's no proof of his lies.The case is about 62/63.. which cover "Sadaqat and Amanat" of a member of parliament.
Once I heard a judge saying that sometime judges know in the first hearing who is the real culprit, but the only thing that comes in between justice and them is law...
You can visit manzoor law book house and order online. http://manzoorlawbook.com/index.php/products/search
In the the third search box, just enter the name of the book and you will see its availability.
Lies, on the floor of parliament.
one more thought..... based on this decision... there will be petitions filed against members of parliament and future PMs as well..... and quiet a few people should get disqualified....probably most sitting in current assembly...
The more, the merrier
be careful what you wish for... is main kuch parda nasheeno k bhi naam aatay hain
Thanks for the link... I will try to find it in bookstore first... If I dont get it there, then i will order online..usually i am not much comfortable with online buying... But if i dont get it, then i will definitely buy it online, InshaAllah... I really want to read his book... Want to know his thinking process... I think, it will be an interesting read
one more thought..... based on this decision... there will be petitions filed against members of parliament and future PMs as well..... and quiet a few people should get disqualified....probably most sitting in current assembly...