What's new

Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dil Pakistan said:
It will be ALL THREE judges - inshaALLAH

Don't worry.
Click to expand...

Aap ne advocate aur pakora ka previous detailed verdict parha tha? They dismissed 62/63 .. Sari behas is par kartay rahay tht why we cant disqualify PM on 62/63... Aaj bhi pooch rahay thay ke hum kis hadd tak jaa saktay hain? Inn ke iraday mujhe theek nahi lagtay shuru se...Regd Ijazul Ahsan ..i am almost sure ke woh disqualify kar dein ge
 
Last edited:
.
when nawaz sharif said that a lot of ...RAAZ.... are buried in my heart
i think he was taling about the 55 BILLIONS DOLLARS FROM CHINA ,N CPEC.
he is a partner in crime in it also. so why do i suffer only.
he was threatning the OTHER PARTNER. guess who that is??????
millions / billions have been skimed off... thats why project is so hush -hush
remember ispr yesterday...........what was said in it.......cpec cpec n cpec

2 wrestlers fighting ........both wrestled before also. but everytime it was fake kushti...
now the other wrestler has refree on his side... thats the conspiracy

THE DAY ........ DEAL IS STRUCK...............EVERYONE WILL HEAR THE JUDGEMENT/VERDICT.....
IF NOT SOON? it means that the dealing is not final. yet
so drag on . cat n mouse game.......

every time thing reach a boiling point climax in this seasonal movie,
a long interval is announced.................
after interval a new story starts......
am just guessing how many seasons are still left in this action, adventure, comedy. thriller movie
 
.
Farah Sohail said:
Aap ne advocate aur pakora ka previous detailed verdict parha tha? They dismissed 62/63 .. Sari behas is par kartay rahay tht why we cant disqualify PM on 62/63... Aaj bhi pooch rahay thay ke hum kis hadd tak jaa saktay hain? Inn ke iraday mujhe theek nahi lagtay shuru se...Regd Ijazul Ahsan ..i am almost sure ke woh disqualify kar dein ge
Click to expand...

Badi-un-Nazar mein :-) wohi conclusion draw hota hey jo aap ney kya.

Inside story is a little different and this is what I eluded to in my earlier post today.

To disqualify a PM (or any other), purely on the basis of 62 and 63 will set a bad judicial precedence.
The rulings of SC are not for an individual case.
They set standards, interpret constitution and then referenced for ever (For this reason no one references Bhutto's judgement in any judicial case).

In addition, 62 and 63 are "questionable" and "frowned upon" in the legal circles. These were introduced by Gen. Zia for his own motives.

Now! the reason judges have questioned, and did the same today, this 62 and 63 is because they want to use this constitutional case to interpret 62 and 63. This is a golden opportunity for the SC.

This is why judges are bringing this up again and again. They want to link 62 and 63 with UNDENIABLE proof (i.e., if there is a proof against an individual, of all wrong doings, then they should be disqualified under 62 and 63 - not without evidence, which was the motive of Gen Zia).
 
.
Dil Pakistan said:
Badi-un-Nazar mein :-) wohi conclusion draw hota hey jo aap ney kya.

Inside story is a little different and this is what I eluded to in my earlier post today.

To disqualify a PM (or any other), purely on the basis of 62 and 63 will set a bad judicial precedence.
The rulings of SC are not for an individual case.
They set standards, interpret constitution and then referenced for ever (For this reason no one references Bhutto's judgement in any judicial case).

In addition, 62 and 63 are "questionable" and "frowned upon" in the legal circles. These were introduced by Gen. Zia for his own motives.

Now! the reason judges have questioned, and did the same today, this 62 and 63 is because they want to use this constitutional case to interpret 62 and 63. This is a golden opportunity for the SC.

This is why judges are bringing this up again and again. They want to link 62 and 63 with UNDENIABLE proof (i.e., if there is a proof against an individual, of all wrong doings, then they should be disqualified under 62 and 63 - not without evidence, which was the motive of Gen Zia).
Click to expand...

Ye 62/63 ka pehla case nahi hai.. Is se pehle bhi SC...khud directly bhtt se logon ko 62/63 par disqualify kar chuki hai..fake degree ya assets concealment main... Justice Ijazul Ahsan ne bhi un verdicts ka zikr kiya tha, apni judgment main.. Jab ke advocate aur pakora tu is taraf aaye hi nahi thay..
 
.
Farah Sohail said:
Ye 62/63 ka pehla case nahi hai.. Is se pehle bhi SC...khud directly bhtt se logon ko 62/63 par disqualify kar chuki hai..fake degree ya assets concealment main... Justice Ijazul Ahsan ne bhi un verdicts ka zikr kiya tha, apni judgment main.. Jab ke advocate aur pakora tu is taraf aaye hi nahi thay..
Click to expand...

True! ...we may not care ... but this is the case of PM of Pakistan (NOT NS the MNA). This is the difference here.

I am not saying that they will totally ignore 62 and 63; they will set the parameters of 62 and 63 for PM of Pakistan - which is an important legal requirement.

It is the job of the SC to interpret the constitution - it is a constitutional court.

Also, I don't think PTI and JI lawyers are doing a good job. They don't have the calibre of being a constitutional lawyer.

Top constitutional lawyers in Pakistan are: Khalid Anwer, Aitazaz Ahsen, Salman Raja, Aziz A Munshi.
 
.
Zibago said:
Lol is qom sey ye umeed :D
Click to expand...
lol potential to bht mojood hai, aksar talent ka muzaira karty rehty hen jooti chor aur jeb kutron ka qeema bna kar, bas ain ke direction politicians ke taraf morny wala bnda chahye:p:
 
. . . .
QatariPrince said:
Allah keray aisa hi ho
Click to expand...

I hope there is no deal with the Godfather, if it comes to that scenario, expect mass civil disobedience and maybe civil war, the JIT was constitued by the supreme court, so why would SC go against JIT when there is mountains of evidence against Godfather, NAB and FIA are dead, they wont do jack.
 
. . . .
Moonlight said:
She's gonna say, "beta main apni Bety ko janty hon" so tusi sanu chuko na :D

*off the topic....
Click to expand...

Lol...

My mother used to say the same till one day it abruptly changed to " ay munda kaide kol nai labda"
 
. .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

GlobalVillageSpace
Panama Case: should Supreme Court render the final judgement?
Replies
0
Views
579
GlobalVillageSpace
GlobalVillageSpace
PakSword
Panamagate case: London flats were bought through Qatari investments, Sharif family tells SC
5 6 7 8 9 10
Replies
136
Views
10K
The Eagle
The Eagle

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Military Forum Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom