muhammadhafeezmalik
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2015
- Messages
- 5,417
- Reaction score
- -17
- Country
- Location
And the incorrigible dude continues on and on... let me clarify again dear...
- Not even Khawaja Haris touched the matter of missing staple marks from pages of the deed submitted by Mryam Nawaz nor the date change, lol...Get it???What happens when you take out old staple binding the whole document and change a page and staple the whole document again???
- While the rest of the pages in the document have two staple marks, lol, the pages where the deeds are signed and dated have just one staple mark, lol... only possible if those pages were added later between the older pages, lol.... PROVES NOTHING ???
- Who else but Maryam is responsible for the forgery in her own submitted documents and that too also in dates, making 2004 into 2006...
- It is a fact that all solicitors observe holiday on Saturday and Sunday in England. Changing 2004 to 2006 meant that the date of attestation by solicitor falls on a Saturday after the change, lol...
- Lastly about Calibri beta font in 2005: Calibri Beta testers, after inhouse Microsoft Alpha version test stage, got hold of beta Calibri font in May 2006 whereas the document submitted by Maryam is dated February 2006, lol...
As was reported in press:
Robert Radley who is also a forensic expert mentioned while recording his statement a very important thing, which was apparently ignored by Nawaz’s counsel that the trust deed submitted by Maryam Nawaz in front of Supreme Court formed Joint Investigation Team (JIT) was ‘forged’ as the year when the deed was made seems to have been changed from 2004-to 2006.
Nawaz Sharif’s counsel Khawaja Harris was focused solely on cross examining the ‘Calibri Font’, whereas the alleged forgery pertaining to the trust deed of Sharifs offshore companies was not cross-examined and was left unchecked and unverified.
This all proves nothing as per the judgment of IHC.
