What's new

Panama Case - Post Verdict Discussion and Updates

. . . . . . . .
Useless thread continues...as useless games are still being played by uselessly old fashioned behind the scenes players who's seeds of 80s we are still reaping to this day.

One of the most significant highlight of the appeal verdict is just as SHOCKING as the mockery in the name of some of the comments that resonated in the courtroom...

DokRqUXXUAAybbR.jpg

@PakSword @Farah Sohail @Arsalan @Path-Finder @IceCold
Are the IHC Judges saying that trial court Judge should have written and NAB should have proved that Maryam is a daughter of Nawaz Sharif,...What is this???

Lets look at the NAB Law once again for the record, lol...


NAO 1999 "9A - (V)" and "9 A-(xii) STATES:

9 (A) A holder of a public office, or any other person, is said to commit or to have committed the offence of corruption and corrupt practices-

(v) if he or any of his dependents or benamidar owns, possesses, or has 4[acquired] right or title in any 5[“assets or holds irrevocable power of attorney in respect of any assets] or

(xii) if he aids, assists, abets, attempts or acts in conspiracy with a person or a holder of public office accused of an offence as provided in clauses (i) to (xi).]; and



NAB ORDINANCE1.jpg


Masha Allah, The IHC Judges have given bail in a NAB Case where Bail is not even allowed, lol... look at above blue box, lol:rofl:

Amazing judicial interpretation by the august judges of the High Court of Islamabad...

@Retired Troll bhai yeh games khailnay walay kab sabaq seekhain gay???
 
.
Useless thread continues...as useless games are still being played by uselessly old fashioned behind the scenes players who's seeds of 80s we are still reaping to this day.

One of the most significant highlight of the appeal verdict is just as SHOCKING as the mockery in the name of some of the comments that resonated in the courtroom...

View attachment 502894
@PakSword @Farah Sohail @Arsalan @Path-Finder @IceCold
Are the IHC Judges saying that trial court Judge should have written and NAB should have proved that Maryam is a daughter of Nawaz Sharif,...What is this???

Lets look at the NAB Law once again for the record, lol...


NAO 1999 "9A - (V)" and "9 A-(xii) STATES:

9 (A) A holder of a public office, or any other person, is said to commit or to have committed the offence of corruption and corrupt practices-

(v) if he or any of his dependents or benamidar owns, possesses, or has 4[acquired] right or title in any 5[“assets or holds irrevocable power of attorney in respect of any assets] or

(xii) if he aids, assists, abets, attempts or acts in conspiracy with a person or a holder of public office accused of an offence as provided in clauses (i) to (xi).]; and


View attachment 502906

The NAB court should have narrate in detail that how Marium helped her father in conspiracy.
 
.
The NAB court should have narrate in detail that how Marium helped her father in conspiracy.
NAB law is absolutely clear and the same sub clauses of the NAB act have been applied on the criminals...That is in its self sufficient for all intended purposes.

Kindly read what is posted again.

what else is committing forgery in back date but aiding and abetting the criminal father???
 
.
Useless thread continues...as useless games are still being played by uselessly old fashioned behind the scenes players who's seeds of 80s we are still reaping to this day.

One of the most significant highlight of the appeal verdict is just as SHOCKING as the mockery in the name of some of the comments that resonated in the courtroom...

View attachment 502894
@PakSword @Farah Sohail @Arsalan @Path-Finder @IceCold
Are the IHC Judges saying that trial court Judge should have written and NAB should have proved that Maryam is a daughter of Nawaz Sharif,...What is this???

Lets look at the NAB Law once again for the record, lol...


NAO 1999 "9A - (V)" and "9 A-(xii) STATES:

9 (A) A holder of a public office, or any other person, is said to commit or to have committed the offence of corruption and corrupt practices-

(v) if he or any of his dependents or benamidar owns, possesses, or has 4[acquired] right or title in any 5[“assets or holds irrevocable power of attorney in respect of any assets] or

(xii) if he aids, assists, abets, attempts or acts in conspiracy with a person or a holder of public office accused of an offence as provided in clauses (i) to (xi).]; and



View attachment 502907

Masha Allah, The IHC Judges have given bail in a NAB Case where Bail is not even allowed, lol... look at above blue box, lol:rofl:

Amazing judicial interpretation by the august judges of the High Court of Islamabad...

@Retired Troll bhai yeh games khailnay walay kab sabaq seekhain gay???

IHC is a disgrace, they have set a bad precedent, this whole lower judiciary is corrupt to the core, why did the judge not ask where is the damn money trail?
 
.
Tammo jani, ye tu batao kay yeh Nawaz Badmash aur uss ki Mujrim Jaalsaaz Baiti Jail say nikalnay kay baad say khamoosh kyun hain ???

You said you will never again support Nawaz or Maryam if they make a deal to get out...LOL.

Ab tu kaisay inhain support karay ga Kaalya???

But here we are watching you go back on your word once again and proving that all PMLN are alike, be it spineless leadership or just as mediocre followers.
 
.
NAB law is absolutely clear and the same sub clauses of the NAB act have been applied on the criminals...That is in its self sufficient for all intended purposes.

Kindly read what is posted again.

what else is committing forgery in back date but aiding and abetting the criminal father???

Read the IHC verdict again it narrates that the font was in use but not commercially available. So it does not prove that the trust deed was forged. Again forgery is not is not in the ambit of NAB.

Tammo jani, ye tu batao kay yeh Nawaz Badmash aur uss ki Mujrim Jaalsaaz Baiti Jail say nikalnay kay baad say khamoosh kyun hain ???

You said you will never again support Nawaz or Maryam if they make a deal to get out...LOL.

Ab tu kaisay inhain support karay ga Kaalya???

But here we are watching you go back on your word once again and proving that all PMLN are alike, be it spineless leadership or just as mediocre followers.

اسکی ماں مر گئی تھی، اب وہ کیا بھنگڑے ڈالتی؟؟
 
.
Read the IHC verdict again it narrates that the font was in use but not commercially available. So it does not prove that the trust deed was forged. Again forgery is not is not in the ambit of NAB.
Font was only available to developers as in software experts who work for developing Microsoft products, lol...
This was explicitly said by the expert witness and everyone knows that Software Development Kit products are only available to Beta testing advance Software developers and designers of Fonts, lol...

This lame excuse was shot down in trial court but IHC still choose to use it as a reason to help the sharifs, lol...how so very convenient...lol.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom