So your argument is --- since the MKI beat the typhoons 12:0 because of reasons A,B & C --- therefore an MKI would also beat an F-16 because F-16 is older compared to a typhoon ...
First off, that 12:0 statement was taken back by the IAF, since -- you know -- it was false and RAF pointed that out for ya --- and its not really the first time that the IAF well wishers have gone berserk with their claims -- Be it Indra dhanush 07 where airforce monthly completely ripped the story that was presented to IAF fanboys, or that incident with the USAF colonel's video which pretty much exposed the "greatness of the IAF" and lets not forget the Cope India's --- What was it ?? --- We beat USAF 9:1 at Cope India's -- except when the ROE's were released, the claim became comical -- which is not an understatement as Indian victory at Cope India was something like....
Floyd Mayweather going " Not bragging but --- I have knocked out Muhammad Ali " --- following it up by " M.Ali at that time was 70 years of age, had Parkinson syndrome , was fighting with both his hands tied behind his back and a couple of my boys holding him down"
and lets not ignore the great logic, where since the F-16 is older then typhoon, hence if the IAF beat the typhoon it is automatically assumed that MKI will be whopping the falcons left & right .. funny how the typhoons have had kills over the MKI in Indra dhanush 07's and the fact that F-16 itself has participated with typhoons in different exercises and has got simulated kills ... and here is a kicker -- the SU-30, like the F-16 is also older compared to an EF-2000 ...
and while we're talking about records, lets not forget the IAF's biggest record, that makes it number one in the world i.e Crash record -- since we're assuming these records would be translating in to battle -- lets not be picky and choosy