What's new

Pakistan's ISI intelligence agency 'supports' Taliban: UK University

India has barely 10 buildings in that country. Out of a total million buildings in Afghanistan if one of ten buildings is targeted, its a precise attack. That's 10% of our infrastructure destroyed.

1 or two attack a year. Reminds me an old news when one of the NATO country were bribing AT and one month they didn't pay or left the base and another country took there place got under attack.

You should not stop their monthly wages. They will surely get upset and blow you up.


Compare that to random destruction in Pakistan. Out of a million buildings, even if 100 are destroyed, its not such a big deal.

If go by your logic 166 death on Mumbai was not even .0001 percent of whole indian population. So 26/11 was no big deal. You should never mention 26/11 again. its just 166 out of 100 million.
 
i guess he meant Hamed Gul. these days its easier to get around the argument by calling someone conspiracy theorist. so dont bother. furthermore, the other two guests very much agreed with wat Hamed Gul said.

even Zardari called Hmaid Gul the political ideologue of terror, he openly speaks in favor of the taliban and was among the 4 people the United States called "International terrorist", his comments are good for nothing and propaganda and lies at its best. This man is one of the causes of the state of Pakistan today.
 
even Zardari called Hmaid Gul the political ideologue of terror, he openly speaks in favor of the taliban and was among the 4 people the United States called "International terrorist", his comments are good for nothing and propaganda and lies at its best. This man is one of the causes of the state of Pakistan today.

well if zardari or US calls him terrorist or wateva, that does not make him so.

define conspiracy theorist?
1. someone who says something opposite to that of mainstream view?
2. someone who questions the missing links?
3. someone who blames the state for perusing hidden agendas?
 
Speaking of Hamid Gul.Look who is standing with Hamid Gul here on Pak-Afghan Border..It's not CIA station Chief but CIA director.
isi_and_cia_directors_in_mujahideen_camp1987.jpg

So we all at one point supported these groups.
 
☪☪☪☪;928750 said:
Speaking of Hamid Gul.Look who is standing with Hamid Gul here on Pak-Afghan Border..It's not CIA station Chief but CIA director.
isi_and_cia_directors_in_mujahideen_camp1987.jpg

So we all at one point supported these groups.

Ohh Damn thats gotta be photo shopped :rofl: :rofl:

I just cant stop laughing, :rofl:

EDIT: Sparkling Just Kidding, I found this really funny hahahhaa
 
Last edited:
wow, so just because the report has come from the LSE it MUST be right because the LSE is always right?

this is uneducated rubbish.

vast chunks of the western establishment who are apparently respectable and honest organisations believed that iraq had WMD and supported the US war.

well guess what, if they had used some commons sense they could have excluded the possibility in 15 minutes and the exact same applies here!!!

indians will jump on anything that reinforces their agenda, they will not however try to prove their claim, this is nothing new.

theres a limit to speculation without proof and i think a line needs to be drawn, if you cant prove it then shut up!!
 
well if zardari or US calls him terrorist or wateva, that does not make him so.

define conspiracy theorist?
1. someone who says something opposite to that of mainstream view?
2. someone who questions the missing links?
3. someone who blames the state for perusing hidden agendas?

Conspiracy theory is a term that originally was a neutral descriptor for any claim of civil, criminal, or political conspiracy. However, it has become largely pejorative and used almost exclusively to refer to any fringe theory which explains a historical or current event as the result of a secret plot by conspirators of almost superhuman power and cunning.

or

when one person cannot swallow the reality and comes up with his/her version of the truth to better suit their own needs. Eg Hamid Gul lol

Im surprised that you are acutally supporting Hamid Gul when he has done nothing for your country except support the very people your army is fighting.
 
Clinton threatened Sharif because he took false advantage of the situation, broke treaties with India regarding backing of troops during winter, and with US regarding use of nuclear missiles.
What treaties did we have with the US on nuclear or missile related issues?

What treaty did we have with India, that had not already been violated by India (Simla violated by virtue of India's foray into Siachen)?
Musharraf sent in soldiers and mujahideen in Kargil. Sending mujahiddeen was a clear support to terrorism, not just support, the army was leading them, providing them with ammo, armor and logistics.
Terrorism is generally defined as acts of violence perpetrated deliberately against a civilian population - in Kargil the infiltrators/insurgents/soldiers were in direct combat with Indian troops, and not deliberately attacking civilians, so please don't distort the issue and flame by using the term 'terrorism' out of context.
 
Im surprised that you are acutally supporting Hamid Gul when he has done nothing for your country except support the very people your army is fighting.

we are fighting the people other people have created

that is to say the mujhadeen types who were conceptualised, created and funded by the us establishment and the insurgents from southern afghanistan who are being sent back and forth by the US
 
Here is another great picture:



In the centre its ISI DG Akhtar Abdur Rahman and on his right is supreme head of american intelligence William Casey (look up his interesting background).

It is ironic that people who use this pic, list Rahman as Casey as he looks more like a leader.
 
Speaking of Hamid Gul.Look who is standing with Hamid Gul here on Pak-Afghan Border..It's not CIA station Chief but CIA director.

have a look at this:



"These Gentlemen are the moral equivalents of America's Founding Fathers"
Ronald Reagan
 
Conspiracy theory is a term that originally was a neutral descriptor for any claim of civil, criminal, or political conspiracy. However, it has become largely pejorative and used almost exclusively to refer to any fringe theory which explains a historical or current event as the result of a secret plot by conspirators of almost superhuman power and cunning.

or

when one person cannot swallow the reality and comes up with his/her version of the truth to better suit their own needs. Eg Hamid Gul lol

Im surprised that you are acutally supporting Hamid Gul when he has done nothing for your country except support the very people your army is fighting.

under this definition, US can also be called a conspiracy theorist state for waging a war against iraq to suit her own needs. furthermore they did it without any evidence and only with the help of propaganda. also under the same definition Hamed Gul turns out to be less of a conspiracy theorist as his 9/11 theory was at least based on many unanswered questions regarding the event.
 
An interesting thing is that Hamid Gul had a full set of interesting pics up on Media Cell and the page has been removed.

Here is a cached version of the page.

Mass Media Cell

Wonder who did it because it showed Hamid Gul with Hekmatyar, Massoud, Haqqani, CIA Director, Chinese Diplomats and many others. Oh it also had Charlie Wilson.
 
Back
Top Bottom