Pakistan’s flag to be hoisted on Indian soil for Salman’s upcoming film Bharat

[Cobra Arbok]

LOL! Again parroting, thankfully we don't have a severe cognitive disability, we know that perfectly.

Indus originates in Tibet. Dang!!! China trumps all ya. Then it flows through Indian territory and then to Pakistan. So much childish sentiments.
By the same logic, it's not 'Your" history either. There are few provinces missing (FATA, AJK (if you consider them privinces) and add to that the largest IVC site is not in Pakistan, TBH it's funny you "claim" but facts don't substantiate them and the thing about Archeology is it's constantly evolving, new sites are being discovered further east. Nice attempt at drawing some history and it's good to see a few people are at least trying for an identity that's pre-historic. Are you taught about these, say the Mauryans, Ashoka, Shaka, Kushana etc...??
I guess not. Alexander the great vs porus, then dark..... then pops up at Umayyads.


Cognition. Indian subcontinent includes parts of Pakistan, Bangladesh, parts of Afghanistan etc...

The book cannot mention something that didn't exist before 1947. Pakistan. That's why they correctly mentioned the names of the regions. I guess you didn't read the book at all, the book mentioned how Mughals entered the subcontinent through "Afghanistan" because Pakistan is part of the subcontinent.

I'm not gonna draw more on that further, it's better you're like this. Fun to read these laughable claims.

haha nope. Ask him, he knows it (I guess).

Indian rats have a civilized discussion in various forums. Even in here, there was no instance in my time in PDF I called a Pakistani by derogatory names. But hey, two different upbringing.

And I accept your apology, but then I wasn't hurt by your remarks, Hinduism survived more than 3000 years through invasions both Philosophical, and though forced conversions by other religions, yet here we are, so your remarks don't even make a ripple in my beliefs. The word Hindu was somewhat coined by the British, but I wouldn't go so deep given your tendency to draw ire and trouble mods.

There is a search function in the forum, use that term and type my name in the "Posted by member" box. You wouldn't find any.

@Cobra Arbok used to be reasonable, he talked in a well-articulated way about history, what he is now is as a result of people like you who calls them names, abuses, lol. It has gotten so bad that there is a direction given by Slav Defence with the list of names you shouldn't call in the forum lol. How sad, people don't even know what words are offensive.


You got it, boss.

I am reasonable to reasonable people

 

[LASER1]

Is there a single film since 1947 which does not mention Pakistan in it?

It's hard to find movies that say Pakistan over the 2000+ movies made in India a year. You're grossly exaggerating your position in Indian movies.

 

[Dubious]

@SabzShaheen Kindly watch your language...

 

[SabzShaheen]

LOL! Again parroting, thankfully we don't have a severe cognitive disability, we know that perfectly.

ah, so after multiple posts of you denying this, you finally accept it. bravo

Indus originates in Tibet. Dang!!! China trumps all ya. Then it flows through Indian territory and then to Pakistan. So much childish sentiments.

yes, obviously the indus flows through these countries (only including India if we consider kashmir a part of it). it is known for flowing through pakistan primarily, though and is thus associated with it.

By the same logic, it's not 'Your" history either. There are few provinces missing (FATA, AJK (if you consider them privinces) and add to that the largest IVC site is not in Pakistan, TBH it's funny you "claim" but facts don't substantiate them and the thing about Archeology is it's constantly evolving, new sites are being discovered further east. Nice attempt at drawing some history and it's good to see a few people are at least trying for an identity that's pre-historic. Are you taught about these, say the Mauryans, Ashoka, Shaka, Kushana etc...??
I guess not. Alexander the great vs porus, then dark..... then pops up at Umayyads.

i thought it was general knowledge that the IVC originated from around the Indus River? By your logic, we cannot trust any history derived from archeology. who knows, maybe IVC originated from the mighty ganga and the mauryan rulers were in fact pashtuns. as i've repeated many times, the history of our modern nation states themselves only extends to 1947. the history of the land that they currently encompass extends beyond that. what you can't do it to claim BS like the modern republic of india is the successor of the IVC or mughals etc based on shared religion or name.

Cognition. Indian subcontinent includes parts of Pakistan, Bangladesh, parts of Afghanistan etc...

The book cannot mention something that didn't exist before 1947. Pakistan. That's why they correctly mentioned the names of the regions. I guess you didn't read the book at all, the book mentioned how Mughals entered the subcontinent through "Afghanistan" because Pakistan is part of the subcontinent.

i did read it though i did not make my point clear about them mentioning pakistan. i meant they could have said "the land that constitutes modern day pakistan" or something similar though that is unlikely. they didn't explicitly mention how mughals entered through afghanistan though alluded to it.

I'm not gonna draw more on that further, it's better you're like this. Fun to read these laughable claims.

so areas of rule which literally have the word ganga in their name (east and western ganga dynasties) are a myth are they?

Indian rats have a civilized discussion in various forums. Even in here, there was no instance in my time in PDF I called a Pakistani by derogatory names. But hey, two different upbringing.

when i say indian rats i am not referring to all indian as rats though annoyingly, this is what it alludes to. i regrettably do this sometimes without making it clear what i mean. i was referring to those who will swarm someone with a worldview different to their's with insult and abuse coupled with fake facts. it happens amongst all people. i'll stop using such phrases altogether from now on.

And I accept your apology, but then I wasn't hurt by your remarks, Hinduism survived more than 3000 years through invasions both Philosophical, and though forced conversions by other religions, yet here we are, so your remarks don't even make a ripple in my beliefs. The word Hindu was somewhat coined by the British, but I wouldn't go so deep given your tendency to draw ire and trouble mods.

pretty sure hindu was coined by persians. and i'm not the main one complaining to mods about trolling whilst engaging in it myself.

There is a search function in the forum, use that term and type my name in the "Posted by member" box. You wouldn't find any.

did i restrict it to this forum? i said elsewhere, meaning outside of the forum.

@Cobra Arbok used to be reasonable, he talked in a well-articulated way about history, what he is now is as a result of people like you who calls them names, abuses, lol. It has gotten so bad that there is a direction given by Slav Defence with the list of names you shouldn't call in the forum lol. How sad, people don't even know what words are offensive.

victim mentality won't take you anywhere. i highly doubt it was the case as you say but it's possible. i used to be more patient with these topics until a few things happened. now i don't trust indians to have an open conversation about politics or history. i have done much research in the past and presented my points and as a sign of me being correct, i was treated badly lol.

I am reasonable to reasonable people

mate i will be reasonable. tell me what i said isn't reasonable

 

[war&peace]

It's hard to find movies that say Pakistan over the 2000+ movies made in India a year. You're grossly exaggerating your position in Indian movies.

99.9999999% Indian movies revolve around Pakistan.

 

[Cobra Arbok]

ah, so after multiple posts of you denying this, you finally accept it. bravo


yes, obviously the indus flows through these countries (only including India if we consider kashmir a part of it). it is known for flowing through pakistan primarily, though and is thus associated with it.

i thought it was general knowledge that the IVC originated from around the Indus River? By your logic, we cannot trust any history derived from archeology. who knows, maybe IVC originated from the mighty ganga and the mauryan rulers were in fact pashtuns. as i've repeated many times, the history of our modern nation states themselves only extends to 1947. the history of the land that they currently encompass extends beyond that. what you can't do it to claim BS like the modern republic of india is the successor of the IVC or mughals etc based on shared religion or name.

i did read it though i did not make my point clear about them mentioning pakistan. i meant they could have said "the land that constitutes modern day pakistan" or something similar though that is unlikely. they didn't explicitly mention how mughals entered through afghanistan though alluded to it.


so areas of rule which literally have the word ganga in their name (east and western ganga dynasties) are a myth are they?

when i say indian rats i am not referring to all indian as rats though annoyingly, this is what it alludes to. i regrettably do this sometimes without making it clear what i mean. i was referring to those who will swarm someone with a worldview different to their's with insult and abuse coupled with fake facts. it happens amongst all people. i'll stop using such phrases altogether from now on.

pretty sure hindu was coined by persians. and i'm not the main one complaining to mods about trolling whilst engaging in it myself.

did i restrict it to this forum? i said elsewhere, meaning outside of the forum.


victim mentality won't take you anywhere. i highly doubt it was the case as you say but it's possible. i used to be more patient with these topics until a few things happened. now i don't trust indians to have an open conversation about politics or history. i have done much research in the past and presented my points and as a sign of me being correct, i was treated badly lol.


mate i will be reasonable. tell me what i said isn't reasonable

when did i say you arent reasonable? i was responding to lasers assertion tat i am not reasonable because of some interactions i have had with trolls.

 

[SabzShaheen]

when did i say you arent reasonable? i was responding to lasers assertion tat i am not reasonable because of some interactions i have had with trolls.

ah okay. i have sadly trolled in this thread but i got carried away. i still hold onto the slight hope that i can have an open conversation about the continent's history and politics.

 

[Cobra Arbok]

ah okay. i have sadly trolled in this thread but i got carried away. i still hold onto the slight hope that i can have an open conversation about the continent's history and politics.

tbh I have not really interacted with you so I cannot make any assumptions about you. But if you are interested in subcontinental history as I am i have posted threads about the histories of various regions in india. I always appreciate productive input.

 

[SuvarnaTeja]

Why is the on forums and why the hell articles are written about it.
They were making another film where they portray their twisted prescription of pakistan. Where they show Pakistanis helping Indians against Pakistan. Where they show a raw and isi agent marry...
So it's a film and they are doing it for film. So what the hell.
I just don't know why Indians have to twist everything related to Pakistan and make a news out of nothing .

Its called publicity.

 

[Cobra Arbok]

99.9999999% Indian movies revolve around Pakistan.

you forgot to add sone more 9s

 

[war&peace]

you forgot to add sone more 9s

It is okay since it leaves only 9.999999406318238e-08% which is pretty small value.

 

[SabzShaheen]

tbh I have not really interacted with you so I cannot make any assumptions about you. But if you are interested in subcontinental history as I am i have posted threads about the histories of various regions in india. I always appreciate productive input.

cheers, i'll check them out when i'm free

 

[Sam.]

@LASER Learn to ignore and move on. Understand what has (or rather did not) happened here.

This link says it all:


And as far as the new history being written here, it is only because of the same issues, a need to identify. The assertion of Arabic preceding Indo-European languages, the Eastern sub-set of which consists of Indo-Persian, is the joke to top it all.

I have done research that India was name given by Martian Languages Xerzes dialect, my original research.

Please, henceforth, continue to push this.

@Sam. Your wise inputs? @Joe Shearer good you have taken a sabbatical. I made a mistake of thinking some improvement has come.

I am quite busy for the upcoming exam in 2019

As for the Pakistani flag on Indian soil well it was designed in British India before 1947 so it was hoisted on Indian soil for quite some time and an old story.

Ultra nationalist should protest why it's being hoisted on Indian soil(Gilgit Baltistan) since 1947.

 

[maithil]

Choti Choti khushiyan.

 

[Hellfire]

I am quite busy for the upcoming exam in 2019

Need a helping hand? Am free after 10 Jan 19.

Ultra nationalist should protest why it's being hoisted on Indian soil(Gilgit Baltistan) since 1947.

That will be the day. They are too busy fighting own people in India. They will hemorrhage if I write about the Birth of Indian Special Forces