thanks detective, for your assumptions. like i've said, i read over both links. i saw the mention on the first page. they only mention how the site at harappa was found in pakistan, nothing else. also, i was referring to the mughal link, not both.
Yeah, I guess nothing will satisfy your bias. Besides, I still assert, Pakistan region didn't play an important part in Mughal history, there was no central Kingdom at Pakistan enough for a specific mention.
By the way, you still failed to produce any evidence that proves what you are taught like Muryans, Shakas, Kushans, etc... I assume that your history starts with Umayyad's given you are still drawing tangent replies.
sikh empire and gandhara to name a few. you are again proving my point about indians wanting to deny pakistanis the history of our land, making up excuses about how any rules that extended from land that constitutes modern-day pakistan were insignificant or unnoteworthy. the fact may be that we are disunited about our identity at present time, but we have no insecurities of the richness of our land in terms of its history and culture.
The Sikh empire barely lasted 50 years. Proving my point, there wasn't a large empire that flourished, centered around today's Pakistan due to its geography. What is Gandhara? (An empire around it?)
And lol! We are not denying you anything. We are not the ones who don't preserve the ancient ruins of temples, Buddhist pilgrim sites, defaced Buddha carvings etc... You yourself are denying your history. We simply feel sorry for you.
LOL so when i rebuke your ignorance, they are "tangent replies"?
Rebuke my ignorance?
Sunny, you just invented names. Like Ganga empires, that's not worth a reply. It's laughable.
sadly ignorance of the opposition brings out the worst from me. i am not a great debater who can just keep his cool.
More like ignorant people make the worst replies (Ganga empire
). Hence, gutter people use gutter language.
the history of your land yes;
Not land, the culture. Your claims are simply based on the land. You don't have anything that's remotely connected to the Dharmic culture and religion. Having a bunch of archeological sites and few movable and immovable items doesn't make you, them. It makes up for a tourist destination. Like Egypt.
To have an identity, you need a continuous culture. That's why we don't have an identity issue.
i'm surprised you're even willing to talk about this subject since we know where your religion and the origin of your culture is from (IVC).
That's what I said above, your claims are based on geography. Which is good for tourism.
You don't own the culture, we do. That's why I said, you can simply claim everything under the sun originated in Pakistan.
we're not associating with anyone. Pakistan was given its identity when it was created, a nation of refuge for Muslims of the subcontinent.
Good, then believe that. You are an Islamic nation, who now owns many Indus valley sites, we are a secular nation like we used to before 1947 having many Indus valley sites and land where 3000+ years old culture is still practiced where 4 of the major religions in the world originated and flourished.
our land's history is different from our current identity, which is simple. same goes for egypt which i keep mentioning but you conveniently keep ignoring. you may have chosen to stuck with the same religion and way of life, but we changed to what we knew to be the truth.
You got my attention now. And makes good for a tourist destination if any.
Thankfully, Egyptians preserved some of its histories, unlike those defaced and destroyed monuments in Pakistan.
