In a nutshell.How does the ZDK03 compare to the saab-2000s?
Greater scan range, less clearer picture.
Greater loiter time, less sophisticated equipment.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In a nutshell.How does the ZDK03 compare to the saab-2000s?
Piss poor actually, considering that the 20 year old E-2's APS-145 can track over 2000.
Perhaps the idea of tracking target means controlling interceptions. Even then , that figure is appalling if true.
In a nutshell.
Greater scan range, less clearer picture.
Greater loiter time, less sophisticated equipment.
tracks 30, engage 9-10 simultaneously
kj2000 can track 50, so not bad in that context
zdk has better sea scanning compared to erieye
Should have gone for those l88. Opportunity missed.
In a nutshell.
Greater scan range, less clearer picture.
Greater loiter time, less sophisticated equipment.
Piss poor actually, considering that the 20 year old E-2's APS-145 can track over 2000.
Perhaps the idea of tracking target means controlling interceptions. Even then , that figure is appalling if true.
3-4 more would be based on KJ-500. Pakistan is building Navy bases in Balochistan. A permanent AWAC squadron ( First three or four with limited AESA scan) for navy is one of the possible scenarios why Pakistan would order more AWAC. Airborne radars for navy would fill the gaps that exist in surface ships long range detection capability while the latter 3-4 with true 360 degree capability would service Pakistan AF.
most welcome,
SAM story is a bit funny, china offered fd-2000 which was a cheaper version of hq-9, now fd2000 also has a cheaper version, we do make them work hard at times
most welcome,
SAM story is a bit funny, china offered fd-2000 which was a cheaper version of hq-9, now fd2000 also has a cheaper version, we do make them work hard at times
Navy relies on UAVs for maritime survaillance.Yea, that's what i was thinking, it's too poor to be true. Probably a typo. Once the order goes ahead, as usual we will know more.
I believe they would still be used by PAF, as Navy hardly has the expertise or the budget to allocate for these new assets. They are quite occupied with the P3Cs, and as such should focus on what Navy really does : get more ships, and submarines with SLCM capability.
Navy relies on UAVs for maritime survaillance.
That's for sure, a cheaper version will hopefully be just as capable? Also, could you double check with your source on 9 engagements? and the full track while scan count for the ZDK-03 platform? This number looks awful to be honest, for such a large jet to fly, operators, fuel and maintenance cost, vs. the capability. I think there may have been something missing from the picture.....
About RD-93MA looks like PAC/CAC could have problem with exports therefore it could have been shelved in favor of WS series Engine that is in works.
MA is pretty much an option for jft, along with ws-13, regardless whether paf opts for it or not. customers who would want it, get it. russia designed it exclusively for export