Developereo, we do not need to do anything, whatever we could have done, would not have been more than what is happening in Pakistan. In-fact good we did not do anything, it could have diverted the attention of war on terror. I now understand it, by not doing anything how we gained so much.
Also, it is not always right to show your bravado by attacking the other, we have to always look at cost to benefit. That cost to benefit was not worth the fight and we made the right decision. Do you have a logic to explain if we would have attacked then we would have gained anything let me know, if you agree then why this question?