Pakistan today conducted a successful test of Fatah-1 - ISPR

[Goritoes]

Precision

 

[Akatosh]

all the missile carrier trucks in Pakistan are Chinese Origin as far as launcher tubes are concern Fatah-1 has longer tubes than A-200 one can count the ribs of rocket container tubes
A-200 MLRS TUBES
View attachment 772913

FATAH-1 View attachment 772914

even the Truck is arrange differently in Fatah-1 Truck have separate cabin for firing unit, but it is not available with A-200
View attachment 772921

FATAH-1
View attachment 772914

Is this comparison accurate?

 

[dilpakistani]

Is this comparison accurate?

okay so it is chiense system...so what mate.... as far as your side is concern origin of the weapon is irrelevant, only thing relevant for you guys should be the capability we bring to the theater...

 

[Bilal.]

okay so it is chiense system...so what mate.... as far as your side is concern origin of the weapon is irrelevant, only thing relevant for you guys should be the capability we bring to the theater...

Bro. There is nothing common between the two pictures. Except what you would expect from any similar system.

It’s like comparing two cars and saying hey look both have 4 wheels, chassis, two headlights….

 

[Shah_Deu]

Is this comparison accurate?

There are still more differences than your only successful re-painted 'indigineous' cruije mijjile

 

[HRK]

okay so it is chiense system...so what mate

Oh come on leave the idiot in his world of imagination

And for idiots like him I want them to answer

if similarities of the truck would decide the system then the truck and its arrangement is similar to A-100 as well

why him and his kind is not terming Fatah-1 as improve A-100 ... ???

FATAH-1 has minor improvement of just 20 km in terms of range as A-100 is capable to hit the target at 120 km range only .... while A-200 have a range of 200 Km ....

IF Fatah-1 is A-200 than it MUST have 200 Km range not 140 km ....

I have already shown that Fatah-1 canister is longer than both A-200 and from the canister of A-300 and only logical reason one could think is that the Fatah-1 have Longer Rockets as compare to both A-200 and A-300

For reference watch official Video of A-200 & A-300

so to all my Pakistani members plz just ignore him and his kind ....

 

[Blacklight]

@Blacklight

Check the name
Fatah-1
means they have more in pockets to burn over neighbor in near future.

Recvd some good news. Nieghbour is confused, why actual sat data and ISPR press releases do not match.

 

[Maarkhoor]

Recvd some good news. Nieghbour is confused, why actual sat data and ISPR releases do not match.

It makes them more confuse either we fire Nasr (Nuclear) or Fatha-1 (non-Nuclear) They will not get what burnt them.

Seedha haath dikha k bhayen hath ka thapad

 

[Sinnerman108]

This is very very interesting and encouraging.

 

[ARMalik]

Noob questions:

Why do we target static targets? Is it to simulate targeting static enemy troop concentrations? Could the same system be used to take out moving armored/mechanized columns? If so, how could the trajectory be adjusted? PS. any estimates on how long it takes to hit the target at maximum range or would that be classified?

YES but only with real time data. If these system can be hooked up to a Netcentric battlefield system, then there is no reason why the system can't be used against moving armored/mechanized columns.

 

[Pak Nationalist]

YES but only with real time data. If these system can be hooked up to a Netcentric battlefield system, then there is no reason why the system can't be used against moving armored/mechanized columns.

And what kind of assets could act as sensors? Do ELINT platforms or AWACS provide situational awareness vis a vis ground troop movements too? Satellites cannot stay atop certain geographic locations indefinitely.

 

[White and Green with M/S]

Is this comparison accurate?

Different angles, And your INDIGENOUS MRLS isn't Russian design lol

 

[ARMalik]

And what kind of assets could act as sensors? Do ELINT platforms or AWACS provide situational awareness vis a vis ground troop movements too? Satellites cannot stay atop certain geographic locations indefinitely.

Drones, ELINT, AWACS, Satellites, etc. Even connected Fighter jets, Helicopters. Drones are probably the most economical.

 

[Akh1112]

Noob questions:

Why do we target static targets? Is it to simulate targeting static enemy troop concentrations? Could the same system be used to take out moving armored/mechanized columns? If so, how could the trajectory be adjusted? PS. any estimates on how long it takes to hit the target at maximum range or would that be classified?

Speed = d/t

some math for you to do ;p

 

[Pak Nationalist]

Speed = d/t

some math for you to do ;p

Haha, two variables are unknown, or is the speed known? :/?