Safriz
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2010
- Messages
- 20,845
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
Eurofighter? Keep dreaming.Great news, I wish PAF surprises me with Eurofighter purchase one day.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Eurofighter? Keep dreaming.Great news, I wish PAF surprises me with Eurofighter purchase one day.
Yep so basically ISTAR for the ground is mostly in the hands of the PA (if we account for EO/IR-equipped Hercs and Falcos), and the PAF is focusing most of its ISTAR on the air.
To be fair I was dreaming about additional Erieyes a few months agoGreat news, I wish PAF surprises me with Eurofighter purchase one day.
Eurofighter? Keep dreaming.
To be fair I was dreaming about additional Erieyes a few months ago
You have a friend who dreams of Euro Fighter, Hazrat @ZarvanI'll sir. It all starts from a dream.
Must have been "Qabooliyat ka waqt"
I wouldn't trust those dreams ...You have a friend who dreams of Euro Fighter, Hazrat @Zarvan
I wouldn't trust those dreams ...
That's the point,with whom these Platforms will be coupled?is the main Question?They need more bloody fighter jets bro.
1)Nope, original plan was always get ZdK to talk to ground, combine data and then transmit to assets. It could talk to JF-17 difectly through link-17.1). Wasnt ZDK designed to talk to Vipers via Erieye ? Direct contact was never possible from the onset. Your statement has multiple inferences. It's up to you whether you wanna explain or not. Either Link-17 in ZDK is not upto mark, or Link-17 is not installed in erieye and erieye is talking to all in Link-16.
2.) It got me thinking, The initial requirement of PAF was 5 or 6 Erieyes initially which they scaled down to 4. Is this kind up of a followup order because funds has become available to them.
3.) Look post#40. Looks like PAF is bringing Erieye to original strength envisioned earlier in 2006 before they reduced the numbers due to earthquake. So PAF is going for older (or existing) version of Erieye
Since it is PAF shopping. Not the PA or not PA sharing the funds per se with PAF on this acquisition. Or AFAIK, there is no PAF-PA policy on such kind of asset sharing where PAF controllers from air can guide PA troops on ground. Hence PAF would not consider spending money on some asset until such Policy, asset sharing and basic C&C is setup.
King Air is sole responsibility of PA. It is PA Signint or Avaition group controllers who are guiding PA troops on ground.
You have a friend who dreams of Euro Fighter, Hazrat @Zarvan
1)Nope, original plan was always get ZdK to talk to ground, combine data and then transmit to assets. It could talk to JF-17 difectly through link-17.
Erieye does not have link-17.
2) that was always the plan, same as with the F-16. Its not a year to year basis plan, its 10 years or five years.
3)no proof to suggest that is true or false, mere speculation is not a good idea.
Why go for such expensive planes when chinese are offering their top of the line j10 and j20 at cheap rates ?Well originally I used to dream of Rafale but Indians are clearly clever. Gave French a lollipop for 126 jets and settled on 36.
PAF should also try such tricks.
I see India trying to block the Swedish channel (for Pakistan) in future.
If Gripen doesn't go through than possibly a submarine deal.
Why go for such expensive planes when chinese are offering their top of the line j10 and j20 at cheap rates ?
Bhai, Saab is from Sweden not SSGwell we do need a 4.5 gen heavyweight fighter to fill the gap