What's new

Pakistan takes deliveries of 3 SAAB-2000 Aircraft

As it is already mentioned that Jf17 can get real time data only from ZK03 not from SAAB, same is case with F16s as they are linked with SAAB 2000 AWACS.
In future Pakistan is tilting entirely towards China after induction of JF17-Block 3, expected induction of other assets from China in case of all three forces. The next expected Chinese AWACS shall be much better and natural selection with Chinese or joint platforms.

Please do comment if you know do we have achieved the real time link capability between our entire fleet and both types of AWACS.

Entire JF-17 fleet is data linked with Saab AEW&C.

F-16s however are not compatible with ZDK's yet. US DoD has refused to released the codes which would enable a common link.
 
. . .
Entire JF-17 fleet is data linked with Saab AEW&C.

F-16s however are not compatible with ZDK's yet. US DoD has refused to released the codes which would enable a common link.
if true that's the fresh and good news quoted by you.
 
. .
First off, the price tag for that would be too high. Not for the Radar because it'll probably be the same as the one we have on our Erieye - but for the aircraft itself.

The GlobalEye is a joint venture between SAAB & Bombardier (of Canada). The aircraft is a Bombardier Global 6000 (a cooperate jet).

JETCRAFT-2015-BOMBARDIER-GLOBAL-6000-SN-9543-Exterior.jpg


So, basically you'd be dealing with both Sweden & Canada = Too many cooks spoil the broth.
 
. .
First off, the price tag for that would be too high. Not for the Radar because it'll probably be the same as the one we have on our Erieye - but for the aircraft itself.

The GlobalEye is a joint venture between SAAB & Bombardier (of Canada). The aircraft is a Bombardier Global 6000 (a cooperate jet).

JETCRAFT-2015-BOMBARDIER-GLOBAL-6000-SN-9543-Exterior.jpg


So, basically you'd be dealing with both Sweden & Canada = Too many cooks spoil the broth.
A fully equipped GlobalEye IS quite expensive.
UAE payed $1,27B for a pair.
 
.
Source:
ProvLogo2.png

Pakistan Air Force officials outline Erieye AEW&C recovery process:

In an interview with the state-owned television broadcaster PTV, several of the Pakistan Air Force’s (PAF) leading engineering officers outlined the process the PAF undertook to repair two damaged Saab 2000-based Erieye airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) aircraft.

In August 2012, nine Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) assailants had infiltrated and attacked PAF Minhas in Kamra with the apparent aim of attacking the Erieye AEW&C. The result of the attack left one Erieye as a complete write-off and two others damaged. The fourth Erieye AEW&C was not present at the base. In effect, the attack had left the PAF with only one of its four originally ordered Erieye AEW&C aircraft.

Erieye-Repair-M.jpg


Recalling the condition of the two damaged Erieye AEW&C, Air Commodore Riaz stated, “The aircraft were very badly damaged. There was fire damage to the top of the aircraft, there were bullet holes.” Riaz added, “When we first looked at the aircraft, they looked like complete write-offs, as the company [Saab] said.”

Upon completion of the repair work, the PAF CAS Air Chief Marshal (ACM) Sohail Aman flew on the very first test-sortie of the newly repaired aircraft. The first aircraft was repaired in two years, while the second was completed in one year following the first. Air Commodore Safdar stated that the cost of repairing the two aircraft was 5% of the original value, echoing an earlier statement by ACM Sohail Aman (when he said the cost of repairing the aircraft was $25 million U.S.) Safdar reiterated that Saab’s endorsement was a significant step, stating, “…the execution, if that is not done right, the aircraft flight safety and aircraft life is in serious jeopardy.” Safdar lauded Wing Commander Rafiq’s role in this regard.

Erieye-Repair-10.jpg


Article was edited..., because it was...(well) too long.

Credit: @Bilal Khan (Quwa)
Hey guys why is this radar rectangular? And other one is circular? Which one is the SAAB one?

No they are useless. Decision makers of navy are dumb, they dont know their equipment. We should advice them, what are your thoughts?
Sir sir sir my lord ghalti ho gai sawal poch lia . I think navy walon ko PDF geniuses se bhtr pta hoga.

Well not entirely useless, but not as efficient as the Erieyes.
@war&peace hun aram aey? @Gillani88 ??.....:toast_sign:

ZDK-3 is with PAF
Bhai onko zyda pta hy...
 
.
Hey guys why is this radar rectangular? And other one is circular? Which one is the SAAB one?
Okay, the first two Questions might be explained by someone who has (more) technical knowledge.

I can tell you, that the flat rectangular one is the SAAB.

Here is my fav AEW&C from Boeing based on the B737 (E-7A Wedgetail). It is operated by only 3 Nations. Turkey, Australia & South Korea and the UK just placed an order for Five a couple of months back.

This bloody thing has a great range. Fuselage of a B737-700 & Wings of a B737-800 which means it can carry more fuel & fly further/longer than any B737 (NG Series).

untitled.JPG
 
.
A fully equipped GlobalEye IS quite expensive.
UAE payed $1,27B for a pair.
I think it was 2 new and 2 upgrades (for the Saab 340):

The United Arab Emirates Air Force is to upgrade its two Saab Erieye airborne early-warning aircraft and will buy two new multi-mission systems on a Bombardier Global 6000 platform in a deal valued by the customer at $1.27 billion.​

The contract, which was announced yesterday and signed during the first day of the Dubai Airshow, will see Saab fit new sensors and mission systems to the UAE's two Saab 340-based Erieyes, while the sensor suite for the Global 6000s will be different. No firm timetable has been revealed, but Abdulla al Hashimi, executive director for UAE's military communications at the Airshow, said he expects the new aircraft to be delivered "within two years, maybe."

https://aviationweek.com/dubai-air-show-2015/uae-saab-strike-127-billion-erieye-deal
 
. .
Okay, the first two Questions might be explained by someone who has (more) technical knowledge.

I can tell you, that the flat rectangular one is the SAAB.

Here is my fav AEW&C from Boeing based on the B737 (E-7A Wedgetail). It is operated by only 3 Nations. Turkey, Australia & South Korea and the UK just placed an order for Five a couple of months back.

This bloody thing has a great range. Fuselage of a B737-700 & Wings of a B737-800 which means it can carry more fuel & fly further/longer than any B737 (NG Series).

untitled.JPG

This is not suitable for Pakistan.
 
.
Okay, the first two Questions might be explained by someone who has (more) technical knowledge.

I can tell you, that the flat rectangular one is the SAAB.

Here is my fav AEW&C from Boeing based on the B737 (E-7A Wedgetail). It is operated by only 3 Nations. Turkey, Australia & South Korea and the UK just placed an order for Five a couple of months back.

This bloody thing has a great range. Fuselage of a B737-700 & Wings of a B737-800 which means it can carry more fuel & fly further/longer than any B737 (NG Series).

untitled.JPG
I used to think that rectangular one was ZDK . Now i understand why it is used much more
 
.
This is not suitable for Pakistan.
When I said it was my favorite - I meant personal preference. I've actually been inside the Turkish Air Force Boeing AEW&C during the Dubai Air Show (-courtesy of Boeing Defense & Aerospace).

When you say it is not suitable..., what exactly do you mean?

a) Its price tag.
b) Having to deal with the US
c) Operational Reasons that may not fulfill PAF's needs.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom