LKJ86
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2018
- Messages
- 24,704
- Reaction score
- 30
- Country
- Location
It doesn't look like the new version.These is the domestic version of VT-4. T99A2
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It doesn't look like the new version.These is the domestic version of VT-4. T99A2
I was only talking about obtaining a cheap and affordable tank bro not to become a technology leader in anything.You mean annexed by Yankees and abandon nuclear weapon rights and 800 km or more rang missle development rihgt and war engagement and command right??? And change govement structre and regim to yankees' one!!!
Sure why not!!??
If Pakistan abandon nuclear weapon rights and 800 km or more rang missle development rihgt and war engagement and command right to China and nd change govement structre and regim just like China gov,i am sure,China will take care much more aspects of Pakistan,after all it is a half colony already of China.
Why not you india sign ally treaty with Yankees and abandon your nuclear weapons first,please reminber Jap and S.korea does not have nuclear weapons or the right to pursue them!
S.korea has no rights to start a war without permission of yankees commanders!
master the advanced techs by yourself is the key to become developped country and be richer!
That is why Yankees is afraid of China already,coz China is on the right way to master the most advanced techs,not by stealing,tell me where does huawei steal the 5G techs when its own techs leading the world telecommunication(huawei spent 50 billions USD to develop Kirin serie chipset)!
And where does China steal the world frist quantum communication satellite tehcs when CHina's is the world
first case?!
The reason is quite simple: we have ZTZ-99A already.If VT-4 is that great why isn't the Chinese military not buying it? The very fact that there are ZERO VT-4s in service with the Chinese army tells you that this tank is a cheap copy of some Russian tank, and that the performance of this tank is unsatisfactory. Unfortunately a couple of Chinese members have a bad habit of posting unsubstantiated news and opinions.
go **** yourself idiotThe stupid is you. Low pride and no confident Chinese. Always behind western foreign item as better. Still until now think VT-4 is just another MBT2000 and always make the dumb comment? Just shut your big mouth if you know nothing...
no, i mean Pakistan will be the exporter.With relationship improving with Russia, China will find competition in military sales to Pakistan.
No,bro ,we need have wills,and I am sure just like Brillant Pakistani scientists did in Pakistani Nukes areas,Pakistani reseachers can also acheive world leading class techs in many fields if not in all of them!!!I was only talking about obtaining a cheap and affordable tank bro not to become a technology leader in anything.
WEll said!The reason is quite simple: we have ZTZ-99A already.
If you think it is a cheap copy of some Russian tank, why does Thailand choose the expensive VT-4, not the cheap T-90S?
They will not sell the whole techs of T-84M,it is almost the only legacy inherited from Soviet Union empire,if they do ,they will perish.ukraine is in a pickle let's get the whole technology i. e(oplot M) lock stock and barrel and customise it to our own needs and environment. China helped us make alkhalid that way. and we should be thankful to china for that.
ukraine provide you a chance to be there.I was only talking about obtaining a cheap and affordable tank bro not to become a technology leader in anything.
will China sacrifice all his.business just for 50 tanks order? Ukraine maybe offering engine technology and its armour.If Pakistan really want to buy VT-4 wiht a reasonable units,like 50,unit price amybe reduced to 4 mllions which make the total price 200 millions,and that may persuade China military leader to grant production like and techs transfer to Paksitan army.
10 units or 30 units for tanks are really small.
For god's sake,even a expensive car cost us 1 millions usd already!
It is 2rd line tank in China,i did not see why not?!will China sacrifice all his.business just for 50 tanks order? Ukraine maybe offering engine technology and its armour.
It is about the engine.It is 2rd line tank in China,i did not see why not?!
After all,Pakistan is our ally no?
I am gainst money loss in trade as well but no gain no loss is ok for me!
Export of VT-4 is allowed,but no more loss of money!!!Enough is enough!!!
Maybe one of them is ok.But it must cost a lot of money.maybe China will provide Pakistan hundreds tank free of charge, if say when India invades Pakistan. but China will not transfer key technology like engine know how/ thermal imager/armour/FCS to Pakistan easily. no one wanna create a potential competitor in the market.
let Pakistan have its own.choice. thats not our concern.It is 2rd line tank in China,i did not see why not?!
After all,Pakistan is our ally no?
I am gainst money loss in trade as well but no gain no loss is ok for me!
Export of VT-4 is allowed,but no more loss of money!!!Enough is enough!!!
those cost billions, wont be given easily.For pakistan,we do not gain one percent benifits,but i do not like the trade lose money as well,after all it is chinese poeple's money,we can grant aids to Pakistan,but military trade but Military trade must defend the name and value of military equipments.
People trend not to cherish what they get for free ,it is human's nature!
Maybe one of them is ok.But it must cost a lot of money.
the principle of doing military business with Pakistan is to deter India, not making money.For pakistan,we do not gain one percent benifits,but i do not like the trade lose money as well,after all it is chinese poeple's money,we can grant aids to Pakistan,but military trade but Military trade must defend the name and value of military equipments.
People trend not to cherish what they get for free ,it is human's nature!
Maybe one of them is ok.But it must cost a lot of money.
business is business.It is 2rd line tank in China,i did not see why not?!
After all,Pakistan is our ally no?
I am gainst money loss in trade as well but no gain no loss is ok for me!
Export of VT-4 is allowed,but no more loss of money!!!Enough is enough!!!
Ak is a cheap and affordable tank.I was only talking about obtaining a cheap and affordable tank bro not to become a technology leader in anything.
military aid is ok, but it.should be used to buy Chinese products. thats how it works.For pakistan,we do not gain one percent benifits,but i do not like the trade lose money as well,after all it is chinese poeple's money,we can grant aids to Pakistan,but military trade but Military trade must defend the name and value of military equipments.
People trend not to cherish what they get for free ,it is human's nature!
Maybe one of them is ok.But it must cost a lot of money.
New Recruit
yes,you got it.he gave you the bait and you took it.
A friend isn't someone you can expect to give presents to you.Why is price a concern for China here?