The idea deserves to be mocked when you observe the clandestine dealings of Arabs with Israel itself. The pan-islamist clerics of subcontinent propagated a highly manipulated and stupid form of pan-Islamism in the society. Reality is that the khalifas in Ankara could give little fuq about bunch of Indian Muslims under British crown-ship. The Ottoman empire has long been dissolved and even the country of its origin has moved forward with ideals of modern state building therefore we look every bit stupid to take sides with non-existent legacies today. Pakistan is not the inheritor of Ottoman Empire but many of our pan-islamist clerics will have you believe otherwise.
I had made a post in response to @
King Solomon just to clarify a few things. It was not intended for you, but since you can not let others well alone, so be it.
I would like to know the extent of clandestine dealings of Arabs with Israel. The last time I checked a good while back, the man & wife team that manned the lone 'trade office' in Qatar was basically unemployed. The only tangible result of their being there was the birth of an Israeli baby (a first in Qatar it seems) in an Arab country.
I would really like to know the extent of this 'clandestine activity' that you speak of. Really I mean it. Can you furnish anything that rivals, say, the relations that Egypt and Saudi Arabia have? Or may be the dealings between UAE and Saudi Arabia / Qatar / Egypt / Yemen? Pakistanis have the ability to talk to Israelis through intermediaries if they so wish. But there is no over-riding concern that may want us to do so. Why bother?
You are wrong again; and this time about clerics and Pan-Islamism. There was in fact just ONE name among many others who was a cleric. But his being a Pan-Islamist had nothing to do with his being a cleric.
The Khalifa lived in Ankara? He did not give a (what you call) 'fuq' about a bunch of Indian Muslims living under British crownship? May I ask you how can you say this much? In fact Ottoman Sultans did care enough to ask the British to go easy on Muslims of India, especially after 1857. The results were tangible in that it resulted in reduction of fines and indemnity imposed by the British upon some districts - but it is a forgotten peice of History and not many people know it.
Street intellectuals drawing parallels to print in shallow grade publications has no impact on ground realities. Even a basic internet search will reveal what was apartheid South Afria like.
May I suggest that Defenders of Israeli apartheid do not get much respect these days and they are mainly on the defensive for the foreseeable future. That is an increasingly clear ground reality. Worry about that rather than what 'Street Intellectuals' have to say in 'shallow grade' publications.
Enough well-respected people call Israel an Apartheid society for me to use the label of Apartheid society for Israel without worrying about being contradicted. What is your problem with that? Your profile just shows you as a Pakistani living in Saudi Arabia? Why would you be raising objections about calling Israel an Apartheid society? How is your sensibility disturbed?
Other than the usual propaganda blabber I do not see anything of value coming out of this post.
Then you might well have left it alone. If my post was jsut propaganda blabber, why give it attention? Why dignify with a response, especially since it was made to clarify points raised by another poster? Could it be that you just have to defend Israel no matter what and no matter how?
Perhaps some logical reasoning can help. Why do majority Pakistani's have warm feelings for Arabs? Just because a million or two have employment in the Gulf? That would translate as a cheap sell out. Strategic interests and FO policy is made on long terms goals, sane minded approach and analytic thinking - not emotionalism and religion.
Majority Pakistanis have warm feelings for Arabs not because of 'a million or two have employment' in the Gulf. In fact this works against Arabs in a number of ways. The reasons are pretty easy to guess, but why bother explaining them to you.
Our policy is framed with long term goals and all the rest that you say it should be based upon. You just are not able to articulate the reasoning to yourself or are unwilling to do so.