stab yourself in the eye after reading that post. I just made the mistake of reading the quoted part of your post wondering why you used so many emotes"OLD F-22's"......
(I am sure you can translate the message from these icons)
its a real tragedy that this post will be read by people wasting their time
It is called the 'corner reflector'.
that is I want to say jf-17 can't be fit to counter IN & IAF in the sea..
No they are not. But try and stop these arm chair generals who play call of duty and fight imaginary wars where money is growing on trees .!! Personally I think J10 brings nothing to the table and the added infrastructure when PAF is trying to establish the infrastructure of JFT is hilarious. But hey what do I know!!
This was my way of "nicely" dealing with the extreme anger I felt when some smart individual (or a total ed8), tried to call the F-22 "OLD" and compared it to the Chinese plane which is STILL in design and from the designs of it, still doesn't look totally stealthy.
There weren't emotions, it was a paragraph written in the shape of images. The first part was, the post was silly, comical and ridiculous. Second part, the person's brain waves were obviously out of synch, as he couldn't understand the difference between the -22 and the J-20's. Third was, the post had some crazy ideas in it, showing the writers mind set.
And fourth was, the US rules when it comes to advance aviation and jets such as the -22. Now you see how I compressed such a lengthy response in a few images??? They say a picture is worth a thousand words. Well, here, the pictures were worth a few lines of details I didn't have to write
That is what I am trying to conway to my friend @Zarvan.
Chinese President is supposed to make a plan for 100 years ahead. Though they might have some changes to it in-between.
Not really there are many better aircraft available in the market. What PAF requires is an air-superiority fighter ie J-16, Eurofighter or F-15 SE
Can you open this youtube video on PLAYIT.PK and then copy / past the link so that Pakistani members ca watch it please.
Some thing is cooking...Hope it is yummy and enough to digest
J-11 can be good option but JF-17 with Anti Ship Missiles can do great Job
Look at the headlines. The emphasis being on test!!! There are significant issues that one has to deal with fielding a 5th generation aircraft. Look at all the teething problems of F35 as an example. Chinese products will not be truely Chinese unless the engine is. Try building an engine for a fifth generation fighter. You guys need to cool down and look at what you want to do. India has just intimated and to my understanding the deal is not signed yet for the Rafales. Once the deal is signed it will take 3yrs to deliver, another 2 yrs to complete the order and a couple of yrs to get the fighter up and running and pilots comfortable on it. If modalities are signed by end of year you are looking at 2022 before the fleet is up and running. You have a fighter that is coming on line and you are establishing your setup for it. Where does 7yrs of development of this fighter take you. Those of you who think JFT is short legged why do you think we have tested the OBG system on it and how much time do you need to get to Indian FOBs. What minor modifications can you do to increase the loitering time and why is PAF not going for them. Think people!! Knee jerk reactions are never a good option.
I have serious doubts we ever closed J-10 B project it was never closed as for KJ2000 there are news specially that news which came a month ago of an AWACS arriving in Pakistan is still a mystery that news came almost in every paper is still a mystery. Pakistan would have never dropped J-10 B when we knew India is trying to get Rafale J-10 B and C are our only options to counter them along with F-16 if more we can get good and JF-17 BLOCK II and III but PAF I know would not just depend on two platforms
New Recruit
This was my way of "nicely" dealing with the extreme anger I felt when some smart individual (or a total ed8), tried to call the F-22 "OLD" and compared it to the Chinese plane which is STILL in design and from the designs of it, still doesn't look totally stealthy.
There weren't emotions, it was a paragraph written in the shape of images. The first part was, the post was silly, comical and ridiculous. Second part, the person's brain waves were obviously out of synch, as he couldn't understand the difference between the -22 and the J-20's. Third was, the post had some crazy ideas in it, showing the writers mind set.
And fourth was, the US rules when it comes to advance aviation and jets such as the -22. Now you see how I compressed such a lengthy response in a few images??? They say a picture is worth a thousand words. Well, here, the pictures were worth a few lines of details I didn't have to write
