Pak ICBM

[!eon]

Those who say Pakistan doesn't need one are As**oles

 

[fitpOsitive]

Hey answer to this question is complicated

And a secret too.

 

[barbarosa]

Pak has no need of ICBM, need to target every city of enemy,s country.

 

[ArcaniusXI]

Can we get ICBM? absolutely. But testing an ICBM will only make uncle Sam and his gang more worried, and right now we really don't need sanctions.

 

[war&peace]

And a secret too.

I tend to think the answer is spiritual

 

[Fawad alam]

ICBM is not very urgent matter for us, Our concern should be building a SLV and good communication and spy satellites for self reliance in defense matters.

many countries will have heart attack due to this news.

 

[War Thunder]

Does pak have icbm capability?i know officially they dont,but any learned man here knows any inside info?care to share on logical explanation?thank you

Yes, they do mate. And not from now but long back. Now it's only been improved. The only thing is the testing never happened in Pakistan but elsewhere. And most of the newer missiles that are tested, the real range is never made public and is always kept short of a certain small piece of land in the middle of the middle east ...

If this wasn't so, Pakistan would already have been invaded like Iraq. The only reason they are trying to bring Pakistan down through proxy elements and not direct warfare is that of the hits they will take on their own soil as a result.

 

[Kopa Shamsu]

In my opinion, no. Also I do not see any chances of building a land based ICBM capability in near future as well, not even anything in excess of 3000 km officially.

A simple explanation I can provide is the question of geography and strategy (threat perception) .

Geographically, anyone wishing to target Pakistan has to contend with 'Russian problem' and that is aggravated even further with 'China problem' if such a foe desires a western route to targets in Pakistan. And same case stands for vice versa. Unless someone builds a new one or modify a present one enough to take the southern route, which by the way has its own issues.

Strategy-wise, ICBMs and nukes are a very serious business. You build anything above 3000 m and all friends and foes alike are going to take note and will be forced to take measures (that is may be point something at you). It is not wise to initiate this now when there is no need.

Why does Pakistan need the ICBM when it can reach Andaman Nicobar side of India?

They don't want to destroy the US/EU/Russia or China.
Needless need.

We don't need one. We are not a global power, we have no enemies other than our neighbor. So as we have no strategic interests outside of our neighborhood, building a missile above the range of 3000 km has no justification and will attract unwanted attraction from global powers.

Seeing this and the other thread you opened, it seems you don't understand Pakistani nuclear doctrine. It is a lot different to what other 6 nuclear powers have. We have no global ambitions, we don't afford it and in foreseeable future we will not be having any. Our doctrine is India specific. For example regarding your other thread about nuclear submarine, Pakistan does not need it to complete its Triad. Diesel powered submarines capable of launching SLCM or in future SLBMs will do just fine for us to attack India and will complete our Triad, as again it is India specific.

some very naive and over calculative move,making an ICBM doest make anyone global power,Just like Noko,israel.pakistani nuke cover israel and india,you forgot to cover the biggest enemy,uncle sam,why do you thing anything happens,these two child goes to uncle sam crying specially about pakistan?why "strategically" any of US or Russia needs 13500 nukes?any of those country can be annihilated several times with that amount of nukes,still we are hearing about both may increase their arsenal,they must be idiot?or why not an easy question to begin with? why US and russia keep spending billions in their nuke arsenal when they keep saying the world "Its never going to be used actually,so you should not go for it" i think we have enough IQ to understand that,being an sovereign state,how pak let US enter their territory? israel being a tiny country have ICBM...their all enemies are in middle east,why they need ICBM?ever asked yourself?in needs,no one is anyone's friend,china is your ally right now because they need to tackle india,just like US doing with india to tackle china,i suggest you grab those opportunity,i think u very well know the situation in xinxiang? when i am talking about pakistan having nuclear icbm or nuclear submarine,i am not only talking about pak strategy against india,there is something much more,i guess you know what i am talking about.i have said this before,i am saying this again,pakistan,turkey and iran should have nukes and icbm covering every inch of earth in either direction,i was so furiously frustrated when iran closed their nuclear program.

 

[Imran Khan]

we are poor country more then half of our citizens need education food clean water and medical . our all targets are under our range then why ?

 

[Kopa Shamsu]

we are poor country more then half of our citizens need education food clean water and medical . our all targets are under our range then why ?

ask iraq,libya,syria.for any emerging power,North korea should be an inspiration,now there are many publics there are crying screaming about human rights,one day they will understand there is no use of human right when there will be no human like syria,iraq.

 

[Imran Khan]

ask iraq,libya,syria.for any emerging power,North korea should be an inspiration,now there are many publics there are crying screaming about human rights,one day they will understand there is no use of human right when there will be no human like syria,iraq.

sir be happy book your flight and go live in n.korea . our examples are s.Korea japan Germany and china not rouge states . thanks but no thanks

 

[Kopa Shamsu]

sir be happy book your flight and go live in n.korea . our examples are s.Korea japan Germany and china not rouge states . thanks but no thanks

read my post again,who said anything about booking a flight to noko? your example is s korea ,japan?then be happy to give your all defense control in the hand of US,last time i checked ,even in face on war,s korea had to "ask" US to "reconsider s korea's own missile range capability" ring a bell?

 

[HttpError]

Our nuke program is for peaceful purpose, with current arsenal of missiles we have covered every inch of our enemy's territory. Pakistan should now focus on enhancing the capabilities, design and speed of current platforms. We don't really need an ICBM, what we really need is a nuclear submarine.

 

[CHACHA"G"]

I am very sorry but we don't need ICBMs , USA is not our enemy and not a single country in EU, Russia or even Australia are also not our enemy , so we don't need any ICBM to nuke them.........
We are peace loving country , we don't want to nuke any country but if we face threats to our ......... well you know what I mean.
Our first need is Better Navy with heavy Ships and Better Airforce with more modern and advance medium and heavy birds.
We need better and properly (with advance eqm) equipped Army...........
ICBMs are last thing on the list , I even vote for having Aircraft Carrier before ICBMs are at least in same year.

 

[Kopa Shamsu]

I am very sorry but we don't need ICBMs , USA is not our enemy and not a single country in EU, Russia or even Australia are also not our enemy , so we don't need any ICBM to nuke them.........
We are peace loving country , we don't want to nuke any country but if we face threats to our ......... well you know what I mean.
Our first need is Better Navy with heavy Ships and Better Airforce with more modern and advance medium and heavy birds.
We need better and properly (with advance eqm) equipped Army...........
ICBMs are last thing on the list , I even vote for having Aircraft Carrier before ICBMs are at least in same year.

You dont need to nuke every country in the way ,i am sure russia EU or australia have little or no interest in what others do or meddling in their business,they are happy in doing in their own business.but i am not so sure about the first country you mentioned "not being your enemy" thats just not an enemy,thats a cancer,i wont be surprised if they are currently planning on securing your nuke arsenal,btw thats just my opinion