What's new

Pak ICBM

read my post again,who said anything about booking a flight to noko? your example is s korea ,japan?then be happy to give your all defense control in the hand of US,last time i checked ,even in face on war,s korea had to "ask" US to "reconsider s korea's own missile range capability" ring a bell?
no did ring any bell . we want life of citizens of s.korea and japan we want economy development of s.korea and japan no one wanna be like n.korea
 
.
no did ring any bell . we want life of citizens of s.korea and japan we want economy development of s.korea and japan no one wanna be like n.korea
and i was talking about determination of NoKo not praising their economy and life style,just like you want economy and life style like japan,s korea but dont want to be slave like them to US.or do you?
 
.
and i was talking about determination of NoKo not praising their economy and life style,just like you want economy and life style like japan,s korea but dont want to be slave like them to US.or do you?
they are more free then any s.asian country .
 
.
some very naive and over calculative move,making an ICBM doest make anyone global power,Just like Noko,israel.pakistani nuke cover israel and india,you forgot to cover the biggest enemy,uncle sam,why do you thing anything happens,these two child goes to uncle sam crying specially about pakistan?why "strategically" any of US or Russia needs 13500 nukes?any of those country can be annihilated several times with that amount of nukes,still we are hearing about both may increase their arsenal,they must be idiot?or why not an easy question to begin with? why US and russia keep spending billions in their nuke arsenal when they keep saying the world "Its never going to be used actually,so you should not go for it" i think we have enough IQ to understand that,being an sovereign state,how pak let US enter their territory? israel being a tiny country have ICBM...their all enemies are in middle east,why they need ICBM?ever asked yourself?in needs,no one is anyone's friend,china is your ally right now because they need to tackle india,just like US doing with india to tackle china,i suggest you grab those opportunity,i think u very well know the situation in xinxiang? when i am talking about pakistan having nuclear icbm or nuclear submarine,i am not only talking about pak strategy against india,there is something much more,i guess you know what i am talking about.i have said this before,i am saying this again,pakistan,turkey and iran should have nukes and icbm covering every inch of earth in either direction,i was so furiously frustrated when iran closed their nuclear program.
ICBM is a "vague term."

US mainland is nearly 12000 KM away from Pakistan. We do not have the technological capability and resources to develop an ICBM that can cover this much distance, let alone cover the entire US mainland. If somebody tells you otherwise, take his comments with a grain of salt.

The largest ballistic missile in our arsenal is Shaheen III with a proven range of 2750 KM (MRBM class); Ghauri III had 3000 KM range but it was an unreliable design and was discarded consequently. Next step would be to develop and test an IRBM class ballistic missile (3-stage) but it doesn't guarantee anything in regards to threatening US mainland.

Another thing is that American defenses are becoming formidable over time; they have demonstrated the capability to intercept ICBM class targets in outer space recently and decoys cannot fool their defenses. So even if Pakistan develops an ICBM and deploy a few, we do not stand a chance at overwhelming American defenses because they will advance at a much faster pace. I believe that ballistic missiles will be obsolete weapons in the foreseeable future at some point.

It is advisable to concentrate on regional threats and economy. Pakistan has a number of internal problems to address that it cannot take for granted for long.
 
Last edited:
.
Does pak have icbm capability?i know officially they dont,but any learned man here knows any inside info?care to share on logical explanation?thank you
We do have the capability but we don't need right now since there is no apparent enemy of Pakistan beyond our missile range Currently.
 
.
ICBM is a "vague term."

US mainland is nearly 12000 KM away from Pakistan. We do not have the technological capability and resources to develop an ICBM that can cover this much distance, let alone cover the entire US mainland. If somebody tells you otherwise, take his comments with a grain of salt.

The largest ballistic missile in our arsenal is Shaheen III with a proven range of 2750 KM (MRBM class); Ghauri III had 3000 KM range but it was an unreliable design and was discarded consequently. Next step would be to develop and test an IRBM class ballistic missile (3-stage) but it doesn't guarantee anything in regards to threatening US mainland.

Another thing is that American defenses are becoming formidable over time; they have demonstrated the capability to intercept ICBM class targets in outer space recently and decoys cannot fool their defenses. So even if Pakistan develops an ICBM and deploy a few, we do not stand a chance at overwhelming American defenses because they will advance at a much faster pace. I believe that ballistic missiles will be obsolete weapons in the foreseeable future at some point.

It is advisable to concentrate on regional threats and economy. Pakistan has a number of internal problems to address that it cannot take for granted for long.
america's "formidable missile defense"? :rofl:
the only thing america can make by themselves is p*rnhub and hollywood movies :laugh:
"they have demonstrated that capability" i did not know that,can you please give some link regarding this?missile defense and stealth tech are two tech i would never spend my money on,my enemy will simply come up with it's solution at 1/10 cost when i will require billions of dollers developing these,for me it doesnt worth it.
"We do not have the technological capability and resources to develop an ICBM that can cover this much distance" if noko can,so can you brother,i am not saying you have to do it tomorrow :-)
 
.
Does pak have icbm capability?i know officially they dont,but any learned man here knows any inside info?care to share on logical explanation?thank you
hahaha.................... any learned man here knows any inside info?

 
.
Does pak have icbm capability?i know officially they dont,but any learned man here knows any inside info?care to share on logical explanation?thank you
As other members have suggested...u could ask this question in the relevant threads that already exist instead of opening a new one.

...and I'm just curious...what makes u think that the "insiders" here who may have any knowledge regarding this, would disclose that classified information?

- either Pak doesn't have such a capability in which case any inquiries regarding this would lead to answers like "no" or "I don't know"...which wouldn't keep ppl from speculating about a secret capability anyways

- or assuming the ICBM capability is there and being kept a secret by the country then the "insiders" here wouldn't disclose anything even if they know...which would again lead to answers like "no" or "I don't know"
 
.
we should focus on developing very small nuclear reactors so that we can develop a nuclear powered cruise missiles for unlimited range like russia unveiled and also these reactors can be used in submarine.in a ballistic missile we should use cruise missile as a warhead which will make difficult for any missile defense to intercept
 
.
upload_2018-3-12_9-24-27.png
 
.
we should focus on developing very small nuclear reactors so that we can develop a nuclear powered cruise missiles for unlimited range like russia unveiled and also these reactors can be used in submarine.in a ballistic missile we should use cruise missile as a warhead which will make difficult for any missile defense to intercept

What is a nuclear powered cruise missile ?
 
. .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom