Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And a secret too.Hey answer to this question is complicated
I tend to think the answer is spiritualAnd a secret too.
many countries will have heart attack due to this news.
Does pak have icbm capability?i know officially they dont,but any learned man here knows any inside info?care to share on logical explanation?thank you
In my opinion, no. Also I do not see any chances of building a land based ICBM capability in near future as well, not even anything in excess of 3000 km officially.
A simple explanation I can provide is the question of geography and strategy (threat perception) .
Geographically, anyone wishing to target Pakistan has to contend with 'Russian problem' and that is aggravated even further with 'China problem' if such a foe desires a western route to targets in Pakistan. And same case stands for vice versa. Unless someone builds a new one or modify a present one enough to take the southern route, which by the way has its own issues.
Strategy-wise, ICBMs and nukes are a very serious business. You build anything above 3000 m and all friends and foes alike are going to take note and will be forced to take measures (that is may be point something at you). It is not wise to initiate this now when there is no need.
Why does Pakistan need the ICBM when it can reach Andaman Nicobar side of India?
They don't want to destroy the US/EU/Russia or China.
Needless need.
We don't need one. We are not a global power, we have no enemies other than our neighbor. So as we have no strategic interests outside of our neighborhood, building a missile above the range of 3000 km has no justification and will attract unwanted attraction from global powers.
Seeing this and the other thread you opened, it seems you don't understand Pakistani nuclear doctrine. It is a lot different to what other 6 nuclear powers have. We have no global ambitions, we don't afford it and in foreseeable future we will not be having any. Our doctrine is India specific. For example regarding your other thread about nuclear submarine, Pakistan does not need it to complete its Triad. Diesel powered submarines capable of launching SLCM or in future SLBMs will do just fine for us to attack India and will complete our Triad, as again it is India specific.
ask iraq,libya,syria.for any emerging power,North korea should be an inspiration,now there are many publics there are crying screaming about human rights,one day they will understand there is no use of human right when there will be no human like syria,iraq.we are poor country more then half of our citizens need education food clean water and medical . our all targets are under our range then why ?
sir be happy book your flight and go live in n.korea . our examples are s.Korea japan Germany and china not rouge states . thanks but no thanksask iraq,libya,syria.for any emerging power,North korea should be an inspiration,now there are many publics there are crying screaming about human rights,one day they will understand there is no use of human right when there will be no human like syria,iraq.
read my post again,who said anything about booking a flight to noko? your example is s korea ,japan?then be happy to give your all defense control in the hand of US,last time i checked ,even in face on war,s korea had to "ask" US to "reconsider s korea's own missile range capability" ring a bell?sir be happy book your flight and go live in n.korea . our examples are s.Korea japan Germany and china not rouge states . thanks but no thanks
You dont need to nuke every country in the way ,i am sure russia EU or australia have little or no interest in what others do or meddling in their business,they are happy in doing in their own business.but i am not so sure about the first country you mentioned "not being your enemy" thats just not an enemy,thats a cancer,i wont be surprised if they are currently planning on securing your nuke arsenal,btw thats just my opinionI am very sorry but we don't need ICBMs , USA is not our enemy and not a single country in EU, Russia or even Australia are also not our enemy , so we don't need any ICBM to nuke them.........
We are peace loving country , we don't want to nuke any country but if we face threats to our ......... well you know what I mean.
Our first need is Better Navy with heavy Ships and Better Airforce with more modern and advance medium and heavy birds.
We need better and properly (with advance eqm) equipped Army...........
ICBMs are last thing on the list , I even vote for having Aircraft Carrier before ICBMs are at least in same year.