FOOLS_NIGHTMARE
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2018
- Messages
- 18,063
- Reaction score
- 12
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Khan!,..,
Just like to share a great news with friends here, our J10A is also receiving avionics upgrade.
View attachment 914372
used?Pakistan could go for J-10S with radar upgrade and WS-10 engine. It would solve the trainer problem.
with advance in simulator technology, most of the new fighters are without twin seat requirements. however the need to twin seat has reduced but not diminish. That is why we see twin seaters still been build but not only for conversion but for other roles mainly strike and EW. IN case of JFT, the twin seat is also used as a LIFT in addition to OCU.How come there is no twin seat J-10C and continued production of J-10S only?
with advance in simulator technology, most of the new fighters are without twin seat requirements. however the need to twin seat has reduced but not diminish. That is why we see twin seaters still been build but not only for conversion but for other roles mainly strike and EW. IN case of JFT, the twin seat is also used as a LIFT in addition to OCU.
Because twin seat C based model needs investment to researched, develop and tested. I am assuming there is no need for itI'm aware of that, and I wasn't talking about JFT. My question was why there is continued production of the twin seat J-10 based on the A model airframe and not on the C model airframe.