What's new

PAF J-10C News, Updates and Discussion


News in Jang claiming that '2nd batch' of J-10 C's will arrive today 8th March, which will be welcomed by Chief of Air Staff ACM Zaheer Babar and other officials. Also states that this batch will contain 6 aircraft, and that the 1st batch was received last week.

Now who is going to bring us the best pictures? (emphasis on best)
 
Last edited:
It's under test on foreign military aircraft,maybe PAF?Beside J10C or JF17 i really don't know which kind of chinese exported JET can load such big thing weight 1200KG.
QQ图片20220308094202.png

Link:https://weibo.com/2348604107/LiJKd68Rb#comment
 

News in Jang claiming that '2nd batch' of J-10 C's will arrive today 8th March, which will be welcomed by Chief of Air Staff ACM Zaheer Babar and other officials. Also states that this batch will contain 6 aircraft, and that the 1st batch was received last week.

Now who is going to bring us the best pictures? (emphasis on best)
If Air Chief is ariving at the base to welcome the new birds than probably it will be an official ceremony/event.
 
22 amraams = total weight 7356 pounds.
If we require that kind of a load out then we are barking up the wrong tree.Missile have their specific engagement envelope and also they induce drag.If we want more, we need to start looking into EMP and LASER weapon options.
 
Last edited:
11th of this month PM will be Cheif guest both blk3 and J10C will be induct in same ceremony
Is 11th March date confirmed for an official event ? I didn't noticed this date anywhere in the media. Anyways about time.
 
Why would you pray for that?
Perhaps because India would likely not go for any other asset & Rafales would not be available quite as soon as India might hope. This would allow PAF to induct J-10 in growing numbers, thus maintaining parity (or an edge even). This course of action would commit IAF to a multi-year program from which it can not eke out a significant advantage. The next round would likely be stealth in, say, 7-9 years; & PAF would have already devised a solid plan about that.
 
This thread seems to have lost its direction. We need more pictures. Are you listening PAF? We are hungry. Feed us. LOL...

OK, a few things on a serious note - its a bit of OD but please bear with me.

1. Stop ridiculing each other. I did not think I would see seniors being ridiculed like this by know-nothing up-starts. Idiots, one & all. Y'all can be civil but you have to take your frustrations out on others in the name of patriotism, as though the others are less so.

2. Pakistan's relations & strategic orientation has definitely shifted - J-10CP being an indicator of it. The recent pronouncements from PM make it seem as though it is an irreversible swing & I regret his choice of words. Populism is cheap. He is looking at a desperate situation that is mostly of his own making & people should be careful in ascribing his fortunes to Western conspiracies. Establishment or no Establishment, the strategic direction would still be the same. A saner leader would make the shift seem gradual & without the current bombast. It does not suit Pakistan's interests to brazenly commit to blocs. We must navigate to our advantage without antagonizing others.

3. It is in Pakistan's interest to maintain a strong position & then try to find peace partners in the region, including India. Yes, India because long term prosperity of the region is in making peace, improving connectivity, & reaping dividends. We must look beyond Modi & BJP. Having strong allies & having parity in weapons with our enemies should put us on road to peace, not war. If we are well-connected & secure, we do not need to belong to any bloc. Chinese BRI is a game-changer for the region. If sanity prevails in India, they would see it too. We can work for the region instead of playing bloc politics. Again, populism is cheap & easy. It takes vision to look beyond the obvious.

I foresee a change in thinking in the wake of the Russia-Ukraine war. We should use this opportunity for peace. Pakistan, China, & India should be partners in peace and to me it is quite obvious that this is where future lies. The only use of weapons is to make us secure so that we may approach future with confidence. J-10 should help us do that.
Is there a thread dedicated for geopolitical discussion? I humbly suggest that we should stick to the topic of the thread instead of posting a long post on other subject.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom