What's new

Old Baloch custom of drinking blood from skulls of their enemies

I watched a show about baloch liberation movement on al Jazeera once and 3 baloch fighters they inter vied were dark .That was the first time I realised there were blacks even in the borders of Iran.Balochs may have Iran and Arab blood in them but they are as much south Asians as Punjabi are.(
Baloch are quite handsome people, not comparable with dravidians. And proper balochs are tanned due to hot and sunny climate of balochistan, sibi is hottest place in pakistan.
 
. .
I watched a show about baloch liberation movement on al Jazeera once and 3 baloch fighters they inter vied were dark .That was the first time I realised there were blacks even in the borders of Iran.Balochs may have Iran and Arab blood in them but they are as much south Asians as Punjabi are.(

Dravidianhero dark skin tone does not mean anything. Arabs (real ones in GCC) themselves are quite dark but don't look like Indians. I have noticed apu Indians tend to think skin tone is only thing which matter. Even darkest baloch is quite distinct looking.
 
.
I watched a show about baloch liberation movement on al Jazeera once and 3 baloch fighters they inter vied were dark .That was the first time I realised there were blacks even in the borders of Iran.Balochs may have Iran and Arab blood in them but they are as much south Asians as Punjabi are.(

There are literally Black Baluch who are of African descent so not shit there can be dark Baluch. What is more shocking is to find a light skinned dravidian.
 
.
@al-Hasani is arab supremecist, he would obviously deny us. Arab themeselves have told us that there was jahiliya period. That being said, even pre-islamic arabs had many qualities and positive traits that are characteristics of desert and tribal period.


Share the direct link of UNESCO , UN site and page where saraghari is mentioned.
What is jahilya period?non sense.There may have been some brutal practices here and there.That doesn't mean entire Arabia was like that.Muhammad was a reformer and he had to address all evils which were their in his society.That was the reason he mentioned female infanticide.Suppose if I say rapes should be stopped in India,does that mean that all the women are being raped in India?when we set out to reform a society we address every evil however small it might be.Arabs were no jahils either.Quran itself is a testimony (for a nob Muslim like me)that they were good poets.Even the questions posed to Muhammad by pagans (questioning his prophethood)indicate that they were capable of rational thinking.What we must not forget is that 1500 years ago even the civilised societies had many evil practices if you apply modern standards to them.
 
.
......and all this while we felt we were progressing , after all the first decade of the 21st century is behind us !
 
.
Drinking blood is haram - Animals or else.

Hi,

It was the best source of iron in their diet in those days----that is why scandinivians grew so big when the rest of other nations were small.
 
Last edited:
.
Dravidianhero dark skin tone does not mean anything. Arabs (real ones in GCC) themselves are quite dark but don't look like Indians. I have noticed apu Indians tend to think skin tone is only thing which matter. Even darkest baloch is quite distinct looking.
Maybe the once I saw were a minority in their community.Arabs may be dark but I don't believe these balochs darkness is anything to do with Arabs.Dark complexion has its origins in Dravidian in south Asia and these balochs still have that in their blood.I don't see any other reason for their dark complexion.I have to admit eventhough they are dark they look like an average srilankan than a south Indian dark(facial features)
 
.
Share the direct link of UNESCO , UN site and page where saraghari is mentioned.

Literally, the only source is from the British rulers of that time. We're basing the entire thing on the British. I've seen Indians dismiss British sources a number of times, citing the usual "British divide and rule policy... it's not true."
 
.
There are literally Black Baluch who are of African descent so not shit there can be dark Baluch. What is more shocking is to find a light skinned dravidian.
So you feel majority dravidians are dark skinned and finding a light skinned Dravidian is shocking?it is only for convenience I am using the word Dravidian as there are no pure Dravidian or Aryans in India today.If south Indians are what we call Dravidian today majority of them are brown in color just like many other indians .Finding a light skinned Dravidian is not at all shocking as there are many of them here.
 
. .
Happy to hear that from an Arab;here in india and Pakistan Muslims have spread the notion among themselves that Arabs used to kill their daughters and were blood thirsty (this blood thirsty part might have some truth to it given the fact Arabs were desert dwellers with meagre resources) before Muhammad and it was only after Muhammad that Arabs became civilised(now they changed that too.they are now saying Arabs are still uncivilised as they don't treat Muslims from India on par with Arab Muslims).

This notion is not spread by Pakistani and Indian Muslims, this was stated by Arabian historians themselves. At most Pakistani and Indian Muslims only repeat something that is already said by them.

@al-Hasani is just making a historical point that it was done the world over, that much is true but he does not disagree that Islam ended it even if we take his claim that it was only in the Hijaz.

The real question is when will you Indians end it? :sick:

So you feel majority dravidians are dark skinned and finding a light skinned Dravidian is shocking?it is only for convenience I am using the word Dravidian as there are no pure Dravidian or Aryans in India today.If south Indians are what we call Dravidian today majority of them are brown in color just like many other indians .Finding a light skinned Dravidian is not at all shocking as there are many of them here.

I doubt it.
 
.
This notion is not spread by Pakistani and Indian Muslims, this was stated by Arabian historians themselves. At most Pakistani and Indian Muslims only repeat something that is already said by them.

@al-Hasani is just making a historical point that it was done the world over, that much is true but he does not disagree that Islam ended it even if we take his claim that it was only in the Hijaz.

The real question is when will you Indians end it? :sick:



I doubt it.
Come to south or watch any south Indian news channel where you can see common south Indians.
 
.
Maybe the once I saw were a minority in their community.Arabs may be dark but I don't believe these balochs darkness is anything to do with Arabs.Dark complexion has its origins in Dravidian in south Asia and these balochs still have that in their blood.I don't see any other reason for their dark complexion.I have to admit eventhough they are dark they look like an average srilankan than a south Indian dark(facial features)
Keep your inferiority complex about beauty, skin tone etc to yourself. You always talk about thìs shit, stop yearning about it, own it what bhagwan or shiva has given you. Bus hum ko maaf kardo dravidian
 
. .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom