Nuremberg style Trials for IA officer and Indian leaders.

[Ticker]

^^ GoI is not mandated to please any outsider.

The people who got killed and brutalized were Indians weren't they.

 

[nForce]

No geopolitics has nothing to do with the aspersions for freedom of different in india which are being silenced systematically.

break-away from the Indian federation is simply out of question if that is what you are supporting.

 

[KRAIT]

Want to give many examples but will be off-topic.
India should do what's necessary. Lets give the guilty ones jail term of 1 minute. At least we will be taking against our own security forces which doesn't happen in countries where terrorism has been problem for few decades, much less than what India has witnessed.

 

[Ticker]

No............. The govt is waiting for you and AJTR to point this out before acting on it

This shows the problem is more serious in Pakistan / Balochistan that the CJI has to step in suo moto...(actually may be spurred on by the UN HRC visit )

No Sir, this shows that the Supreme Court of Pakistan has the safety and security of its people and the upkeep of law in the forefront.

Has the Supreme Court of India ever taken up cases of missing people in IOK and NE India. Ever.

 

[ajtr]

^^ GoI is not mandated to please any outsider.

Even Nazis weren't mandated to please anyone but in the end Nuremberg Trials happened to punish all guilty nazis.

 

[SamantK]

Let me make it clear two things those whom you call terrorists are freedom fighters from Azad kashmir and its not pakistan's territory so pakistan cant be blamed for it.all pakistan does is provide azad kashmir security from the hegemonic india and some moral support at UNO and at international arena.

Pakistan is in control of those areas. Period. The onus is on them to stop, India has every right to protect its citizens, using all means!

Terrorist training camps are present in Pakistan Occupied Kashmir and while it continues India cannot be blamed for anything. Human rights issues, get a grip cause no country is doodh ka dhoola.. Comparing 3000 cases, over a period of 15 years, not proved and even if proved, is not very high esp considering that there was active support for Kashmiris for money.

Pakistan had the chance to withdraw its force by the UN resolution, it dilly-dallied and fought wars and started insurgency. Pakistan is to be blamed, they attacked a province using irregulars, who killed, raped and pillaged.

 

[Ticker]

Want to give many examples but will be off-topic.
India should do what's necessary. Lets give the guilty ones jail term of 1 minute. At least we will be taking against our own security forces which doesn't happen in countries where terrorism has been problem for few decades, much less than what India has witnessed.

We take pride in our Supreme Court that it upheld the law and punished even a sitting PM.

Has you Supreme Court ever taken action to uphold Indian law with regard to murders in IOK and NE India and about the plight of India's missing people - probably abducted and killed by Indian security forces or her intelligence agencies. Ever.

 

[SamantK]

Atlast the truth................
Even nazis thought same but in the end Nuremberg Trials happened to punish the guilty.

Let them happen, either ways it will be best for India.. till then Kashmir and our forces are there to protect..

 

[Ticker]

Pakistan is in control of those areas. Period. The onus is on them to stop, India has every right to protect its citizens, using all means!

Terrorist training camps are present in Pakistan Occupied Kashmir and while it continues India cannot be blamed for anything. Human rights issues, get a grip cause no country is doodh ka dhoola.. Comparing 3000 cases, over a period of 15 years, not proved and even if proved, is not very high esp considering that there was active support for Kashmiris for money.

Pakistan had the chance to withdraw its force by the UN resolution, it dilly-dallied and fought wars and started insurgency. Pakistan is to be blamed, they attacked a province using irregulars, who killed, raped and pillaged.

If one looks at Nehru’s speech in the Lok Sabha on June 26, 1952, he said, “It just does not matter what your Constitution says. If the people of Kashmir do not want it, it will not go there.” If the plebiscite went against India, he would accept the verdict “and we would change our Constitution about it”. This he tells his people in the Lok Sabha.

However, the two faces of India were revealed in Nehru’s Note of August 25, 1952. He made a startling revelation about his change of mind by the end of 1948.

He wrote in a Note (Selected Works of Jawaharlal Nehru; volume 19, pages 322-330), “Towards the end of 1948…. it became clear to me then that we would never get the conditions which were necessary for a plebiscite… so I ruled out the plebiscite for all practical purposes.”

He was lying to his own people, he was lying to the Kashmiris and at the same time he was also lying to the United Nations as well as the United Nations Commission for India and Pakistan (UNCIP) in December 1948.

Therefore, Sir, it was not Pakistan who dilly dallied as you say - it was India's own Prime Minister Mr. Nehru who dilly dallied so that plebiscite would not take place.

Please read your own history as written by your own people and get yourself educated before you accuse others.

 

[Ticker]

Please do not think too hard , it's on the wrong lines.

Not that parallels are being drawn, why have you not thought of Nuremberg type trials for officers of the Pak Eastern Command for what they did back in 71 ?

Or...are out of place thought meant only for IA ?

We are discussing India.

 

[ajtr]

Please do not think too hard , it's on the wrong lines.

Not that parallels are being drawn, why have you not thought of Nuremberg type trials for officers of the Pak Eastern Command for what they did back in 71 ?

Or...are out of place thought meant only for IA ?

why should i worry about pakistan.my sole concern are india and as indian i ve right to demand persecution of army officers and political leaders under whom these genocides were perpetrated in india.for pakistan they have their own activists like asma jahangir to demand watever they feel is legal.pakistan is not my concern.

 

[Paan Singh]

If people dont want to live with you then you cant force them against their wishes.

We cant leave territory for few radical and brainwashed goons...

leh n ladakh n jammu have no probs and even in kashmir,every body is not against india

 

[karan.1970]

If one looks at Nehru’s speech in the Lok Sabha on June 26, 1952, he said, “It just does not matter what your Constitution says. If the people of Kashmir do not want it, it will not go there.” If the plebiscite went against India, he would accept the verdict “and we would change our Constitution about it”. This he tells his people in the Lok Sabha.

However, the two faces of India were revealed in Nehru’s Note of August 25, 1952. He made a startling revelation about his change of mind by the end of 1948.

He wrote in a Note (Selected Works of Jawaharlal Nehru; volume 19, pages 322-330), “Towards the end of 1948…. it became clear to me then that we would never get the conditions which were necessary for a plebiscite… so I ruled out the plebiscite for all practical purposes.”

He was lying to his own people, he was lying to the Kashmiris and at the same time he was also lying to the United Nations as well as the United Nations Commission for India and Pakistan (UNCIP) in December 1948.

Therefore, Sir, it was not Pakistan who dilly dallied as you say - it was India's own Prime Minister Mr. Nehru who dilly dallied so that plebiscite would not take place.

Please read your own history as written by your own people and get yourself educated before you accuse others.

Pakistan did not remove their forces which was the prerequisite for plebiscite.. After a significant time passed, India walked away from the agreement because of this delay on Pakistan's part. This duplicity of Pakistan is exemplified by the fact that even today, Pakistan has not yet complied to the prerequisite to the plebiscite..

We are discussing India.

As per the OP, All Pakistanis are ex Indians

 

[karan.1970]

why should i worry about pakistan.my sole concern are india and as indian i ve right to demand persecution of army officers and political leaders under whom these genocides were perpetrated in india.for pakistan they have their own activists like asma jahangir to demand watever they feel is legal.pakistan is not my concern.

Yes.. You have that right.. you are exercising that in the wrong place.. Lodge a case and file an FIR... Or start a PIL.. defence.pk cant help you in your demand...

 

[KRAIT]

Has Supreme court of Pakistan ever taken up the cases of missing people in P0K and G&B and Lahore ??
Last I heard, it was Pakistani army who was being asked to be tried in Bangladesh for war crimes.. How's that coming along??
And whatever happened to the Terrorism trial of your ISI chief in New York and
your country's ex president's trial on murder charges ???

Dear Karan, I think you are going to be banned for bringing Operation Searchlight here.

So long buddy. Your ban will be more than others have and don't say emotional goodbye on any thread, as I might cry. It was great having you here.