patentneer
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- May 15, 2010
- Messages
- 1,920
- Reaction score
- 0
Facts & Arguments Re: Vehicle Biz.
==========================
Hypothetically speaking, if China and India put their nominal vehicle industry skills together, there is a strong biz case for complete overhaul of Global vehicle biz.
- Marketing - trademark, branding, contract-&-sub-contract driven biz. Main job is union mgmt., sales, distribution, finance- Marketing. The big boys do more 'systems integration', ie. screw-tight sub assemblies on an assembly line.
- Vehicles are a TYPICAL :bash: 'metal-bashing' sunset industry, Globally.
- It is NOT an innovation thing ... however much the big 10 scream!
Given time and effort, anyone can jump in -It is a near 100 yr. old industry.
- Heavily unionised and politicised biz. Try shuttering a vehicle shop in the west.
China has built an overbearing, fragmented and perhaps un-sustainable and wastefull vehicle industry. Severe lack of 'nominal' innovation in design etc., though some design elements and capability is demonstrated.
Indian biz is minnow sized, the biz is cartelised by the few established and handfull new players. Some innovation ongoing. Same ... some innovation in China.
Conclusion: Given the market base of Indo-China, local Co.'s may consider collaboration to:
1) Own big home clientele, keep markets 'fair priced', and out-of-reach of TNC's.
2) Build on each other's strenghts, China good in fabrication & govt. funding, India in vehicle software/ elcetronics (30 % of a vehicle), marketing, Globalisation.
3) Take the game to the TNC's by combining Ind-Chin knock-out pricing & strentghts.
Wotsay? Repeat above re: aerospace industry. Take the Russkies along on this 1.
==========================
Hypothetically speaking, if China and India put their nominal vehicle industry skills together, there is a strong biz case for complete overhaul of Global vehicle biz.
- Marketing - trademark, branding, contract-&-sub-contract driven biz. Main job is union mgmt., sales, distribution, finance- Marketing. The big boys do more 'systems integration', ie. screw-tight sub assemblies on an assembly line.
- Vehicles are a TYPICAL :bash: 'metal-bashing' sunset industry, Globally.
- It is NOT an innovation thing ... however much the big 10 scream!
Given time and effort, anyone can jump in -It is a near 100 yr. old industry.
- Heavily unionised and politicised biz. Try shuttering a vehicle shop in the west.
China has built an overbearing, fragmented and perhaps un-sustainable and wastefull vehicle industry. Severe lack of 'nominal' innovation in design etc., though some design elements and capability is demonstrated.
Indian biz is minnow sized, the biz is cartelised by the few established and handfull new players. Some innovation ongoing. Same ... some innovation in China.
Conclusion: Given the market base of Indo-China, local Co.'s may consider collaboration to:
1) Own big home clientele, keep markets 'fair priced', and out-of-reach of TNC's.
2) Build on each other's strenghts, China good in fabrication & govt. funding, India in vehicle software/ elcetronics (30 % of a vehicle), marketing, Globalisation.
3) Take the game to the TNC's by combining Ind-Chin knock-out pricing & strentghts.
Wotsay? Repeat above re: aerospace industry. Take the Russkies along on this 1.
Last edited: