cerberus
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2014
- Messages
- 3,361
- Reaction score
- -20
- Country
- Location
You Dont Understand Its Already Answered In Relevant thread
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You Dont Understand Its Already Answered In Relevant thread
Did they also compare the cost?By the way this supposed big fight was already happening in the Indian media where several articles were comparing JF-17 with LCA showing us how superior the great teja bhai is ...
Plz This has been the STANDARD REPLY for the past 10 Years at PDF.
If you know it, Just send me the Link of the EXACT POST where it has been told. Thats It.
I have scanned 4 threads with over 80 pages.. NO data.. Just Wish Lists and Wish Lists with Data from Chinese technical Spec Sheets.
I wanna know :
What has Pakistan Contributed, Which Technology and Which Lab ?
It is you who need to explain me what is your take on the term Indigenous. I cleared my part.
Agree that thunder is not indigenous. It's joint development between pak china. Is it 50-50% or 25-75% ?Did we claim thunder indigenous no but u do claim tejas indigenous
Tell me exact details of parts u make
However, indigenous in terms for aircraft could be as if a radar is foreign made then has to look that what % radar shares in aircraft so in the end by going component to component except nuts & bolts, you will have the percentage of each component which will prove the % of imported and locally build/manufactured parts which may help call it indigenous or imported so if i am not wrong the ratio for indigenous could be around 60% to call it indigenous.
.
Do you really believe that i will post all documents,agreements and engineer names and addresses with phone numbers.No The They Just Moved From HAL to TATA :
Plz answer my Query : Where is the proof ? That Details the Contribution of Pakistan in JF17 ?
it was not about the picture. It was about the info on it. tell me if that info was 100% wrong.
If you're going to behave like a blithering cunt, you'll get language to match it. Go through the threads. Stop using caps-lock. Can't take you seriously.As I Said, I DID NOT FIND ANYTHING. Stop using Abusive Language.
Give me the EXACT POST where its been Told WHAT HAS PAKISTAN CONTRIBUTED to JF17 ?
Explain to you?
However, indigenous in terms for aircraft could be as if a radar is foreign made then has to look that what % radar shares in aircraft so in the end by going component to component except nuts & bolts, you will have the percentage of each component which will prove the % of imported and locally build/manufactured parts which may help call it indigenous or imported so if i am not wrong the ratio for indigenous could be around 60% to call it indigenous.
Experts or seniors can shed more light.
@Horus sir if you may please.
IAF Cheif Said Its Officially Stated- The fact that you said that the IAF airchief said that tejas will meet IAF's standards ... turned out your own link negated that ...
I Copy Paste Nothing From Wiki Like you stated If there is Show Me Its you are Stating your Fact on Assumptions-Lastly, while giving me a lecture of what CAG does, do read up on the scope of audits of CAG before you copy paste from wiki ... which btw also includes performance audits ...
Question Is LCA Even in In Current Form Less Capable than Its Adversaries JF-17 In this Regard-As far as the current platforms go ... your point is invalid because these things such as weapons or HMD's can be integrated ... it is not an inherent "platform capability" if you will ... as it can be added later on .. and will be integrated in all 3 batches of JFT's ...
Boeing ends contract with HAL over ‘poor quality’ of production | The Financial ExpressYou Dont Understand Its Already Answered In Relevant thread