What's new

Lasting lesson of 1962: don’t be caught off-guard again

1962 was the result of war mongering and Akhand Bharat dreaming Nehru's forward policy. To
imagine that the indians wanted to grab Tibet after all the land grabbing of NE & Kashmir:disagree:.
The greed really got into Nehru and thus india got the spanking. But today's INDIA have
unfortunately forgotten the lesson's of 62 :undecided: and the peace loving people of the world
expect china to teach INDIA another lesson.:agree:

Communist China has been involved in the largest number of military conflicts in Asia. does that sound like a warmonger to you? In all these conflicts, Chinese forces struck with no forewarning. Indeed, a 2010 Pentagon report points out that China has repeatedly carried out military pre-emption in the name of defence: in 1950, 1962, 1969 and 1979. According to the report, "The history of modern Chinese warfare provides numerous case studies in which China's leaders have claimed military pre-emption as a strategically defensive act." The 1974 seizure of Paracel Islands was another example of offense as defence.

The 1962 attack - justified as a defensive act by Beijing, which used Nehru's unguarded remarks ("our instructions are to free our territory") to brand India the aggressor - stands out for China's masterly blending of deception and surprise. The invasion, mounted from two separate fronts, caught India off guard. The "stab-in-the-back" was best summed up by Nehru, who told the nation that an "unscrupulous opponent" had returned "evil for good."
 
. .
1962 was the result of war mongering and Akhand Bharat dreaming Nehru's forward policy. To
imagine that the indians wanted to grab Tibet after all the land grabbing of NE & Kashmir:disagree:.
The greed really got into Nehru and thus india got the spanking. But today's INDIA have
unfortunately forgotten the lesson's of 62 :undecided: and the peace loving people of the world
expect china to teach INDIA another lesson.:agree:

you're an obvious false flag

but yes ... even the false flag saves.

i have a policy of not spanking pak and bd flags .... .even if they are false ones. :laugh:

(wonder.. if chinese_dragon and SinoChallenger are going to be forced to change their flags to Pakistani or BD). :laugh:
 
.
Well you were given a taster in Bombay for which you blamed us but didn't have the balls to do anything about. That relieved the boredom for some of you didn't it

So you say, Pakistani state had role in Mumbai attacks and India was supposed to respond? :)
 
.
India's government needs to move on to plutonium based weapons, then scrap the no first use doctrine. Once enough ICBM's are pointed at the major cities of China, India can then do what Pakistan does to India, which is carry our foreign policy under a nuclear umbrella. If China then invades and conventional forces cannot hold them back, mutually assured destruction in the form of a nuclear holocaust will ensue.

In this situation Chinese aggression is less likely than it is today.

India's nuclear weapons are primarily plutonium based. Pakistan's weapons are uranium based.
 
.
So you say, Pakistani state had role in Mumbai attacks and India was supposed to respond? :)


Not only that he is quite proud of a terrorist attack...don't cry when the same happens in Pk and u don't get anybody's sympathies, which incidentally you don't get anyways.
 
.
Sino-Indian Conflict
Location

China and India share a long border, sectioned into three stretches by Nepal, Sikkim (now Indian state of Sikkim) and Bhutan, which follows the Himalayas between Burma and what was then West Pakistan. A number of disputed regions lie along this border. At its western end is the Aksai Chin region, that sits between the Chinese autonomous region of Xinjiang and Tibet (which China declared as an autonomous region in 1965). The eastern border, between Burma and Bhutan, comprises the present Indian state of Arunachal Pradesh (formerly the North East Frontier Agency). Both of these regions were overrun by China in the 1962 conflict.

Aksai Chin vast region of salt flats at roughly 5,000 meters above sea level, and Arunachal Pradesh is extremely mountainous with a number of peaks exceeding 7000 metres.

Military tactics suggest that for an attack, the ratio in numbers should be roughly 3:1 in favour of the attackers – if one wants to capture and then later hold the objective. In mountain warfare this ratio should be considerably higher as the terrain favours defence.

Despite the disadvantage of this, China was able to take advantage of the terrain: the Chinese Army had possession of the highest ridges in the regions. The high altitude and freezing conditions also cause logistical and welfare difficulties; in past similar conflicts (such as the Italian Campaign of World War I) more casualties have been caused by the harsh conditions than enemy action. The Sino-Indian War was no different, with many troops on both sides dying in the freezing cold.
The western portion
522px-Kashmir_map_big.jpg


The McMahon Line is the red line marking the northern boundary of the disputed area.
483px-China_India_eastern_border_88.jpg


Background

The McMahon Line

In short - The McMahon Line is a line agreed to by Britain and Tibet as part of the Simla Accord, a treaty signed in 1914. Although its legal status is disputed, it is the effective boundary between China and India.

Nehru and promotion of the slogan Hindi-Chini Bhai-Bhai
In the 1950s, India-China relations were cordial and the boundary dispute quiet. The Indian government under PM Nehru promoted the slogan Hindi-Chini bhai-bhai. (India and China are brothers). During Pakistani officials meetings held between India and Pakistan, at airport arrivals and on route – the Indian government at times setup processions with people chanting Hindi-Chini bhai-bhai, reason was obvious to show Pakistan that India is at good terms with China to the detriment of Pakistan.

China was willing to accept McMahon line

Zhou Enlai offered to accept the McMahon Line in 1956, but only in the context of border negotiations as equals, because simply accepting the British boundary would leave the stigma of the unequal treaty and hurt Chinese pride. But Nehru maintained his 1950 statement that he would not accept negotiations if China brought the boundary dispute up, hoping that "China would accept the fait accompli (an established/accomplished fact). In 1954, India renamed the disputed area the North East Frontier Agency.

India acknowledged that Tibet was a part of China and gave up its extraterritorial rights in Tibet inherited from the British in a treaty concluded in April 1954. Nehru later claimed that because China did not bring up the border issue at the 1954 conference, the issue was settled. But the only border India had delineated before the conference was the McMahon Line. Several months after the conference, Nehru ordered maps of India published that showed expansive Indian territorial claims as definite boundaries, notably in Aksai Chin. In the NEFA sector, the new maps gave the hill crest as the boundary, although in some places this line is slightly north of the McMahon Line.

The failure of the 1959 Tibetan uprising and the 14th Dalai Lama's arrival in India in March led Indian parliamentarians to censure Nehru for not securing a commitment from China to respect the McMahon Line. Additionally, the Indian press started openly advocating Tibetan independence. Nehru, seeking to quickly assert sovereignty in response, established "as many military posts along the frontier as possible", unannounced and against the advice of his staff. On discovering the posts, and already suspicious from the ruminations of the Indian press, Chinese leaders began to suspect that Nehru had designs on the region. In August 1959, Chinese troops captured an Indian outpost at Longju.

Chinese-Indian.jpg


Letter from Jawaharlal Nehru to U Nu, the Prime Minister of Burma, showing that the Chinese leadership had no problem to recognize this demarcation between India and 'China's Tibet' in the 1950's.

Claude Arpi: Zhou was ready to accept the McMahon Line

The conflict

China proposes that each side withdraws 20 km away from Line LAC - McMahon Line

In a letter to Nehru dated 24 October 1959, Zhou Enlai proposed that India and China each withdraw their forces 20 kilometers from the line of actual control. Shortly afterward, Zhou defined this line as "the so-called McMahon Line in the east and the line up to which each side exercises actual control in the west".
(The Line of Actual Control (LAC) is the effective border between India and People's Republic of China (PRC). The LAC is 4,057-km long and traverses three areas of northern Indian states: western (Ladakh, Kashmir), middle (Uttarakhand, Himachal) and eastern (Sikkim, Arunachal). Chinese Prime Minister Zhou Enlai first used the phrase in a letter addressed to Indian Prime Minister Nehru dated 24 October 1959.)

Nehru’s Forward Policy – establishing forward posts
In November 1961, Nehru formally adopted the "Forward Policy" of setting up military outposts in disputed areas, including 43 outposts north of Zhou's LAC.

While India kept on doting around their forward posts north of McMahon Line- LAC, China moved back and then pincered cutting the supply to forward posts

On 8 September 1962, a Chinese unit attacked an Indian post at Dhola on the Thagla Ridge, three kilometers north of the McMahon Line. On 20 October China launched a major attack across the McMahon Line as well as another attack further north. The Sino-Indian War which followed was a national humiliation for India, with China quickly advancing 90 km (56 mi) from the McMahon Line to Rupa and then Chaku (65 km southeast of Tawang) in NEPA's extreme western portion, and in the NEFA's extreme eastern tip advancing 30 km (19 mi) to Walong.

India gets aid from US, Britain and also Russia
The Soviet Union, United States and Great Britain pledged military aid to India. China then withdrew to the McMahon Line and repatriated the Indian prisoners of war (1963).


Present day

NEFA was renamed Arunachal Pradesh in 1972—Chinese maps refer to the area as South Tibet.

Lessons Learnt?

In recent past Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping offered India a "package settlement" of the border issue. Eight rounds of talks followed, but there was no agreement.
Déjà vu of Zhou Enlai offered to accept the McMahon Line in 1956?

In my opinion a conflict will occur if India tries to repeat Nehru’s Forward Policy.


well done

this got to be the best Exposé of this conflict
:tup::tup:

:china::china::
 
.
Communist China has been involved in the largest number of military conflicts in Asia. does that sound like a warmonger to you? In all these conflicts, Chinese forces struck with no forewarning. Indeed, a 2010 Pentagon report points out that China has repeatedly carried out military pre-emption in the name of defence: in 1950, 1962, 1969 and 1979. According to the report, "The history of modern Chinese warfare provides numerous case studies in which China's leaders have claimed military pre-emption as a strategically defensive act." The 1974 seizure of Paracel Islands was another example of offense as defence.

The 1962 attack - justified as a defensive act by Beijing, which used Nehru's unguarded remarks ("our instructions are to free our territory") to brand India the aggressor - stands out for China's masterly blending of deception and surprise. The invasion, mounted from two separate fronts, caught India off guard. The "stab-in-the-back" was best summed up by Nehru, who told the nation that an "unscrupulous opponent" had returned "evil for good."

You guys are no saints either. Kashmir, Sikkim, Hyderabad,judanagar. Does these names ring a bell
At least chinese didn't deploy 700000 soldiers in a occupied area like Kashmir to suppress the
aspiration of Kashmiris. China don't sponsor insurgents like India does to instigate political &
economic instability in her neighborhood. You saying as if you guys are saints and the whole
world is out to get you.
 
.
So you say, Pakistani state had role in Mumbai attacks and India was supposed to respond? :)


No I said you blamed Pakistan but then couldn't do anything about it. try reading in context might make more sense to you

Not only that he is quite proud of a terrorist attack...don't cry when the same happens in Pk and u don't get anybody's sympathies, which incidentally you don't get anyways.


This thread is about 1962. clearly you didn't learn anything cos now you want to be white mans proxy against China
 
.
You guys are no saints either. Kashmir, Sikkim, Hyderabad,judanagar. Does these names ring a bell
At least chinese didn't deploy 700000 soldiers in a occupied area like Kashmir to suppress the
aspiration of Kashmiris. China don't sponsor insurgents like India does to instigate political &
economic instability in her neighborhood. You saying as if you guys are saints and the whole
world is out to get you.

So you agree that china are not saints right? LOL and china don't sponsor insurgents? who told you that? they sponsor or have sponsored insurgents in Burma, Thailand, Indonesia, India to name a few...do you want links for proof?
 
.
No I said you blamed Pakistan but then couldn't do anything about it. try reading in context might make more sense to you




This thread is about 1962. clearly you didn't learn anything cos now you want to be white mans proxy against China

i know this thread is about 1962 i started this thread yr mumbai post ssounded as if Pk and China had declared war on us and mumbai was a sample of what Pk can do and that more such incidents will follow. and what have we to learn about being a white man proxy, r u referring to the lesson we should learn from you of being a white man proxy cos u have been one from day one.
believe me we learnt from you.
 
.
So you agree that china are not saints right? LOL and china don't sponsor insurgents? who told you that? they sponsor or have sponsored insurgents in Burma, Thailand, Indonesia, India to name a few...do you want links for proof?

They are better than INDIA in all possible counts and that's what matters the most. The chinese
wins the heart and minds of people and that's how they build relations and influence other countries.
The chinese follow a more moral and realistic way.
 
.
No I said you blamed Pakistan but then couldn't do anything about it. try reading in context might make more sense to you

This was the post for which you responded to.

patience ..... !!!!

We've got bored ... waiting and waiting for what China and Pakistan will do in due course.....

I think your "secret strategy" is to kill us due to boredom. :laugh:

How to plan against such a potent strategy. :laugh:

this is your response:

Well you were given a taster in Bombay for which you blamed us but didn't have the balls to do anything about. That relieved the boredom for some of you didn't it

If one has to relate the both above posts, Besides naked glee for a terrorist attack, the only sense the post makes is that Mumbai attacks was some kind China Pakistan strategy.

So i take back what i said earlier and include China as well.
 
.
Sino-Indian Conflict
Location

China and India share a long border, sectioned into three stretches by Nepal, Sikkim (now Indian state of Sikkim) and Bhutan, which follows the Himalayas between Burma and what was then West Pakistan. A number of disputed regions lie along this border. At its western end is the Aksai Chin region, that sits between the Chinese autonomous region of Xinjiang and Tibet (which China declared as an autonomous region in 1965). The eastern border, between Burma and Bhutan, comprises the present Indian state of Arunachal Pradesh (formerly the North East Frontier Agency). Both of these regions were overrun by China in the 1962 conflict.

Aksai Chin vast region of salt flats at roughly 5,000 meters above sea level, and Arunachal Pradesh is extremely mountainous with a number of peaks exceeding 7000 metres.

Military tactics suggest that for an attack, the ratio in numbers should be roughly 3:1 in favour of the attackers – if one wants to capture and then later hold the objective. In mountain warfare this ratio should be considerably higher as the terrain favours defence.

Despite the disadvantage of this, China was able to take advantage of the terrain: the Chinese Army had possession of the highest ridges in the regions. The high altitude and freezing conditions also cause logistical and welfare difficulties; in past similar conflicts (such as the Italian Campaign of World War I) more casualties have been caused by the harsh conditions than enemy action. The Sino-Indian War was no different, with many troops on both sides dying in the freezing cold.
The western portion
522px-Kashmir_map_big.jpg


The McMahon Line is the red line marking the northern boundary of the disputed area.
483px-China_India_eastern_border_88.jpg


Background

The McMahon Line

In short - The McMahon Line is a line agreed to by Britain and Tibet as part of the Simla Accord, a treaty signed in 1914. Although its legal status is disputed, it is the effective boundary between China and India.

Nehru and promotion of the slogan Hindi-Chini Bhai-Bhai
In the 1950s, India-China relations were cordial and the boundary dispute quiet. The Indian government under PM Nehru promoted the slogan Hindi-Chini bhai-bhai. (India and China are brothers). During Pakistani officials meetings held between India and Pakistan, at airport arrivals and on route – the Indian government at times setup processions with people chanting Hindi-Chini bhai-bhai, reason was obvious to show Pakistan that India is at good terms with China to the detriment of Pakistan.

China was willing to accept McMahon line

Zhou Enlai offered to accept the McMahon Line in 1956, but only in the context of border negotiations as equals, because simply accepting the British boundary would leave the stigma of the unequal treaty and hurt Chinese pride. But Nehru maintained his 1950 statement that he would not accept negotiations if China brought the boundary dispute up, hoping that "China would accept the fait accompli (an established/accomplished fact). In 1954, India renamed the disputed area the North East Frontier Agency.

India acknowledged that Tibet was a part of China and gave up its extraterritorial rights in Tibet inherited from the British in a treaty concluded in April 1954. Nehru later claimed that because China did not bring up the border issue at the 1954 conference, the issue was settled. But the only border India had delineated before the conference was the McMahon Line. Several months after the conference, Nehru ordered maps of India published that showed expansive Indian territorial claims as definite boundaries, notably in Aksai Chin. In the NEFA sector, the new maps gave the hill crest as the boundary, although in some places this line is slightly north of the McMahon Line.

The failure of the 1959 Tibetan uprising and the 14th Dalai Lama's arrival in India in March led Indian parliamentarians to censure Nehru for not securing a commitment from China to respect the McMahon Line. Additionally, the Indian press started openly advocating Tibetan independence. Nehru, seeking to quickly assert sovereignty in response, established "as many military posts along the frontier as possible", unannounced and against the advice of his staff. On discovering the posts, and already suspicious from the ruminations of the Indian press, Chinese leaders began to suspect that Nehru had designs on the region. In August 1959, Chinese troops captured an Indian outpost at Longju.

Chinese-Indian.jpg


Letter from Jawaharlal Nehru to U Nu, the Prime Minister of Burma, showing that the Chinese leadership had no problem to recognize this demarcation between India and 'China's Tibet' in the 1950's.

Claude Arpi: Zhou was ready to accept the McMahon Line

The conflict

China proposes that each side withdraws 20 km away from Line LAC - McMahon Line

In a letter to Nehru dated 24 October 1959, Zhou Enlai proposed that India and China each withdraw their forces 20 kilometers from the line of actual control. Shortly afterward, Zhou defined this line as "the so-called McMahon Line in the east and the line up to which each side exercises actual control in the west".
(The Line of Actual Control (LAC) is the effective border between India and People's Republic of China (PRC). The LAC is 4,057-km long and traverses three areas of northern Indian states: western (Ladakh, Kashmir), middle (Uttarakhand, Himachal) and eastern (Sikkim, Arunachal). Chinese Prime Minister Zhou Enlai first used the phrase in a letter addressed to Indian Prime Minister Nehru dated 24 October 1959.)

Nehru’s Forward Policy – establishing forward posts
In November 1961, Nehru formally adopted the "Forward Policy" of setting up military outposts in disputed areas, including 43 outposts north of Zhou's LAC.

While India kept on doting around their forward posts north of McMahon Line- LAC, China moved back and then pincered cutting the supply to forward posts

On 8 September 1962, a Chinese unit attacked an Indian post at Dhola on the Thagla Ridge, three kilometers north of the McMahon Line. On 20 October China launched a major attack across the McMahon Line as well as another attack further north. The Sino-Indian War which followed was a national humiliation for India, with China quickly advancing 90 km (56 mi) from the McMahon Line to Rupa and then Chaku (65 km southeast of Tawang) in NEPA's extreme western portion, and in the NEFA's extreme eastern tip advancing 30 km (19 mi) to Walong.

India gets aid from US, Britain and also Russia
The Soviet Union, United States and Great Britain pledged military aid to India. China then withdrew to the McMahon Line and repatriated the Indian prisoners of war (1963).


Present day

NEFA was renamed Arunachal Pradesh in 1972—Chinese maps refer to the area as South Tibet.

Lessons Learnt?

In recent past Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping offered India a "package settlement" of the border issue. Eight rounds of talks followed, but there was no agreement.
Déjà vu of Zhou Enlai offered to accept the McMahon Line in 1956?

In my opinion a conflict will occur if India tries to repeat Nehru’s Forward Policy.

Their main area of interest is the Tawang district of Arunachal Pradesh .

734px-Arunachal_Pradesh_district_location_map_Tawang.svg.png


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1aXJhen1LuI
 
. .

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom