Mr.S.Singh
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2014
- Messages
- 1,258
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
Sadly no stats are there too hint on any conclusionThat is untrue.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sadly no stats are there too hint on any conclusionThat is untrue.
Let's discuss article 257 of Pakistan because article 370 comes after 257 in All constitutions
Both Indian gov and Pakistani gov forked up in Kashmir.
PCK Kashmiris seek protection from Pak army.
Hope you understand.
Kindly look into the constitution of AJK. The term "state subject" has clearly been specified. Now who are the subjects of state? State subject is the person living in Jammu and Kashmir or Pakistan as defined by the late government of the state of Jammu and Kashmir Notification No.I-L/84 dated 20th April,1927.And I am saying that there is not just Military threat but also demography threat. Both instrument of accession and article 257 of Pakistan promotes plebiscite in kashmir.
Article 257 of Pakistan also says that without the will of Kashmiris, Pakistan cannot define what kind of relations they will pursue with Kashmir. But Pakistan has overruled their article 257 of Pakistani Constitution by deploying Military.
That means you can cook up any 'fact', because you think that it can not be verified?Sadly no stats are there too hint on any conclusion
alas, easy for some people to fight for land, when our land has been split up, i guess every community goes through their test of times, and the way sikhs are going, soon Canada will be named punjab
The fear of IA pulling out of populated area's are instabilityBoth Indian gov and Pakistani gov forked up in Kashmir.
Even now indian army can pull out of Kashmir, and you will see that ICK Kashmiris will protest daily until Pakistani army pulls out. However when ICK Kashmiris are mistrusted by Indian gov
PCK Kashmiris seek protection from Pak army.
Hope you understand.
That is wrong, because article 257 of Pakistan does not allow that. That's what I am saying.
that means sir, in a country that was Hindu majority, it is quite difficult to point out how large population converted to Islam,That means you can cook up any 'fact', because you think that it can not be verified?
The fear of IA pulling out of populated area's are instability
J&K police have failed to bring the situation under control
What people don't understand is every operation in civilian population is a joint operation between J&K and army
that means sir, in a country that was Hindu majority, it is quite difficult to point out how large population converted to Islam,
When they use to do peacefull conversion pre-mughal era, they would seldom be attacked, same with Christianity
OK mate. you are on PDF
What would you suggest. I mean let us allow cat to come out of the bag.
Why to beat around the bush.
Thank you
Musharraf and manmohan had the best and most workable formula, is still don't get it ... why not sign ??Yes. This has been the routine in the past.
Hope we all who were born long after the dark days of 1947,
Those who were born after the communal savagery, and ethnic cleansing
Yes. you and I would let the old hate go and think about the shared values and peace and harmony.
I don't think Sikh Gurus especially Guru Nanak Sahib ever used the language about common Muslims (in Kashmir and Punjab) the way it is used now.
Peace
Sikhs and muslims lived side by side peacefully, even during the mughal era it was the rulers they fought not the common man/muslimI don't think Sikh Gurus especially Guru Nanak Sahib ever used the language about common Muslims (in Kashmir and Punjab) the way it is used now.
Peace
that means sir, in a country that was Hindu majority, it is quite difficult to point out how large population converted to Islam,
When they use to do peacefull conversion pre-mughal era, they would seldom be attacked, same with Christianity
.....
Sikhs and muslims lived side by side peacefully, even during the mughal era it was the rulers they fought not the common man/muslim
the bitter blood arised during partition, even the fight for independence was fought together in punjab(atleast)
that means sir, in a country that was Hindu majority, it is quite difficult to point out how large population converted to Islam,
When they use to do peacefull conversion pre-mughal era, they would seldom be attacked, same with Christianity