Kashmir War: Is Beyond JKL

[GHALIB]

there won't be any war.

@imadul it's interesting that you mention Himachal - I always thought once and if we are able to occupy entire Kashmir we need to get Himachal as well, like you said, as bargaining chip as well as a buffer zone just like how Israel occupies the Golan Heights.

good idea .
why don't you try .

 

[Nasr]

My main premise of the thesis is outcomes. Outcome of a war on Kashmir shall be to liberate entire JKL. But Pakistan also has to occupy Indian territories in Indian Punjab and Himachal Pradesh to bargain later on for Pakistani territories. I have shown comparative military strengths and scenarios to give a realistic picture whether Pakistan can take on India.

I will hope if this thesis can be featured.

forgive me if I have missed out any portion of your well prepared analysis, but was the "Nuclear Angle" taken into account? Also, have you considered what sort of counter would Pakistan have at hand for bhrahMos supersonic missile strikes?

Also, has there been any due consideration been given to US/NATO presence in Afghanistan, in the event that india actually does start losing territory like crazy. Wouldn't an intervention of some sort be a response of america?

Finally, defending Karachi and Gwadar sounds good on paper, but in reality what really can have implications on Pakistan, is indian naval blockade. How do you propose Pakistan Navy would be able to counter that? When all india needs to do is proliferate the Arabian Sea with it's submarines and deploy it's sole aircraft carrier?

I am asking these questions since I have taken a keen interest in your analysis.