Spring Onion
PDF VETERAN
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2006
- Messages
- 41,403
- Reaction score
- 19
- Country
- Location
Dear Ejaz
India get its freedom from british and was broken in two two entities ..
if Principle and ethics are so important then Partition itself was wrong .
dividing a nation based on narrow definitions of religion , race , caste or any other man made definition is wrong ..
why cant we use the same principle in Baluchistan ?
First of all in the history there was no thing called "INDIA" in the first place.
hence there was no point saying India got freedom from Britishers.
The freedom struggle was more to do with Muslims than Hindus.
Muslims have an important role in getting freedom. They were fool enough to think that Hindus will treat them fairly.
And when the sub-continent was freed from Brits, afterward Muslims realized the way Hindus were eyeing to treat Muslims. That was it when they started struggle for their own homeland.
Those Muslims who opted to remain in India today are the symble of mistreatment.
Look at them the most poverty-striken section of India along with poor low cast Dalits. Its a pitty Muslims are also called Dalits in India due to their bad conditions.
Look at their plight.
Look at the religious conditiom of Muslims in India. They are being burnt alive in Gujrat brutaly.
Millions of Hindu Zionist, were seen by the world burning Babri Mosque and killing Muslims afterwards.