indiapakistanfriendship
BANNED
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2007
- Messages
- 587
- Reaction score
- 0
Agno we can cyle around the issue but the fact of the matter is, entire partition was done on a basis of compramise rather then our ideal wants.Agnostic Muslim
Congress could have refused, as could Jinnah and the Muslim League, who were extremely unhappy with the proposals for partition (moth eaten Pakistan) - but they all agreed, and it was a binding agreement, and in the absence of anything else, that is the only roadmap we have, plus the UNSC resolutions of course, that base a resolution of the dispute on a moral and just principle of letting the people of a territory decide their destiny.
There is nothing called binding agreement in international politics. If it was so then theoritically Bangladesh should have not been recognised as a nation state and should have been considered in the like of South Ossetia or Turkish Cyprus.
As far as bringing in UN is considered, first you have to understand that UN was never designed to effectively prevent small conflicts. Also read my above posts as to why UN will not work to your convinience. If you had wanted a UN resolution to work then you should have taken the UN route completely rather then the other means you have tried to integrate Kashmir into India.