SekrutYakhni
BANNED
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2009
- Messages
- 3,284
- Reaction score
- -11
- Country
- Location
Plebiscite is the only solution.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Officially, baat kis se karein....ISI se, Kiyani sahab se, Zardari sahab se, or Gilani sahab se....which one would be more effective?
I can only wish my sincere good wishes to the Indian and Pakistani leaders....it's time for some action now, baat bahut ho chuki hai....
Good luck Mr. Qureshi and Mr. Krishna...
PM hopeful on Pak ties, wants Qureshi to visit
You're still missing the point. It has come out and said it stands with Kashmiri's, SMQ has come out with condemnation and uttered the resolution in accordance with UN resolutions etc etc.
The silence of the GoP on the Kashmir issue pretty much explains what stance it has taken.
Regardless of the propaganda and nonsense published in the Indian media about the 'ISI sponsoring stone pelters' the facts are that infiltration across the LoC remains at historic lows, as it has for almost a decade now since Musharraf's initiative to try a different tact of resolving the dispute with India, and Pakistan has made almost no attempt to easily exploit a very explosive situation in Kashmir. What little infiltration that occurs has to be accepted given the rugged terrain and the inability of any State to seal off such a demarcation line 100%.
Leave alone covert support for separatists, there has been no diplomatic offensive either, nor was there much of one in the past with the other massive protests in Kashmir.
Quite frankly that reflects Pakistan's intentions to continue engagement with India along the lines of the Musharraf initiative, of not using insurgency to push the issue. It is time now for the Indians, government, media and intelligentsia, to stop scapegoating Pakistan and come to the table to resolve the dispute in a trilateral format that includes the Kashmiris separatists.
The ball is in India's court on this issue.
And as I have said countless times, what will a 'diplomatic offensive' achieve?I think Civfanatic has a point here. While GOP has issued condemnation, the next thing to do is to launch what is called a diplomatic offensive. Pakistan is party to the dispute and hence is bound to make a move on part of the Kashmiri people. It should take up the issue in UN and other international forums to build the pressure on India while it is already on the defensive. The world should be made to realzie that while ultimate solution of the dispute is to be settled by the two countries and the people of Kashmir, the brutality of the Indian forces must be condemned and stopped. By chosing to stay quiet for whatever reasons, they condone the acts of tyranny which would be unacceptable in any other part of the world.
No it's not.Plebiscite is the only solution.
We have no sympathy for anyone who wants to use violence while protesting, thats not protesting, thats rioting, and that applies to everyone, not just Kashmiris.
No it's not.
If the Military controls foreign policy, then the GoP of that time will obviously parrot the military line. This is just a canard to refuse talks with Pakistan.
India whether we like it or not has the clout to tell those nations 'keep your nose out, this is an internal matter, messy as it is, it's internal'. And those nations are obliging.