Well then it's pointless isn't it?
Try to understand that raising this at such international fora has been done to death by us. Then try to sit back and ask 'what did or has it achieved?'
What impact will it make? The US spoke up yesterday, sure it did. But that was in response to church burning. Was it to condemn the killing of civilians? No.
18 people have died on one day, probably the most killed in YEARS, but it stayed on the BBC News front page (a true litmus test of a huge story) for a few hours, and then gone.
Running around and asking countries to condemn 'Indian aggression' has been done before. It's no point looking for diplomatic condemnation when it will make little change to those suffering on the ground - the Kashmiri's.
If Pakistan wishes to use its positive offices, then perhaps it should speak with the APHC, using some backchannels.
But the spotlight falls back on India who will have nothing to do with Pakistan, and are refusing to budge on issues like AFSPA, they have Omar Abdullah looking to quit (he might as well), so we don't hold much sway.
We can condemn, ask others to condemn, but India is in a bind like it hasn't seen for many a year.