Who failed to free Kashmir in 1948 and in 1965. I think its really easy to talk against these politicians and not admitting our own mistake. Sir, our army elites were not allowing the soldiers to retaliate against indian attacks way before the famous US call. One of the officer said that when one of the commanding officer finished his tenure of commanding officer during kargil war, the Shikari intercepted the message of indians that "looks like the command has been changed because these guys are hiding like rats". So nawaz sharif was not leading the war, our army elites were doing so. It is their fault not nawaz sharif fault if they failed to deliver the results.
One more correction sir. It was not pml-n who gave the names of freedom fighters or khalistan movement. It was our famous PPP who was also removed during general asif nawaaz time because it was involved in treacherous works. I admit that pml-n is not good when it comes to governance but this does not mean that you start blaming it for military blunders. Kargil was mishandle by us not by politicians
First of all, before quoting me again, one thing you need to understand that I am not PPPP or PTI supporter nor any other party. I hope that this may help you to understand the situation and words other than being PMLn supporter alone.
It is also easy to blame military and not admitting the treason committed by politicians and here the whole post is summarized. Rest about blaming the PPPP alone, it is like that once Police arrested a thief, an International level thief I would say and soon realizing his weight and demand, was also charged being terrorist, rapist, bugler and what not because that was too easy to do so and give a rest to the other unsolved cases so this is what happens in-case of PPPP. While clearing out NS about leaks of Kashmir, proves that you are missing details and I would request you to go through the data available to you or nay source but to make it worth you have to look at it without PMLN Optic/glass.
Since 1947 till today, every blame is put on Military very easily because all of them politicians were not involved in anything like start it from recent leaks and to what-not that no one can imagine.
and i wonder why the patriotic Musharraf who even insulted the army by his cowardice acts, did not do anything for kashmir during his own tenure. He sure knew how to show street power against lawyers on 12 may 2007 but failed to do so against indians during his tenure. Have you forgotten that the so called coward politician did not get pressurized by the US when they were forcing him not to do nuclear tests? Have you also forgotten who shook hands with
Atal Bihari Vajpayee during SAARC conference. Who submitted to US conditions after 9/11? Bad politician or Musharraf. Ayub khan was good and so was Zia ul haq but musharraf is nowhere near what they did.
and I am not even a Musharraf supporter so the afterwards discussion would be easy to understand.
If Musharraf had done anything being an Army man doesn't allow anyone else to insult the Institution. The claim of credibility of N-Test was very expected to me, I mean it was something like waited in response because such claim is always made by almost every PMLn even people like Danial Aziz. It is same as like as even Choudhary Shujat said once "We forced NS to do so" so every party availed the chance to take credibility and luckily PMLn was ruling. Everyone is aware, the N-Test was not in the guts of NS alone even he was engaged in talks with D.C and was under pressure but other participants in the event (Uniformed & Non-Uniformed) played the major rule as well.
Musharraf shook hand with Vajpayee indeed (and I personally liked the dash) and being blamed of to do so but on other hand someone gone too far in the love of them while saying "Yes we back stabbed India by doing so in Kargil" (do you want me to share that video whereby NS crossed the limits in the love of India). Moreover, on one side we lost many lives on LOC while this NS sent mango/saris for Indian PM. It is not meant here to shoot someone Indian but there is a thing called condemn it and lodge protest and show the sorrow upon such event.
Zia was indeed good for NS (PMLn) and such appraisal proves many of things about PMLn/NS that supports the previous dictators but not the one who tried to expose the real face. However, here I will give you another clue that "by some internal sources, in his last days Zia became aware of NS relations and warming love with India/R&AW that was preparing to get rid of him".
My friend, see things from the prospective where the ill-feed of media shouldn't delude you so also, kindly ignore posts and articles posted by a specific media team. Kargil was not alone mishandled by Military that lacked a few things in planning but in wider aspects, we failed miserably on diplomatic ground that those sacrifices are forgotten and the blame was put on Military as usual.